We performed a comparison between JIRA Portfolio and Sciforma based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Project Portfolio Management solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."I use it to plan and schedule the things I take care of. I can create and share a document if I want to discuss new ideas with my team remotely."
"With JIRA, you can do amazing things by developing connectors, embedding features, and adding new fields to create new things."
"Its stability is very reliable."
"JIRA Portfolio has many wonderful features."
"Has many functionalities including good supervision and workflows."
"The way to manage cards as a KANBAN, is really easy but when you need to track hundreds of projects, you need to be very clear in which way the things must be completed."
"The dashboard is the most valuable feature. The user experience is very good, it's easy to use."
"The customized workflows we can define are very valuable. JIRA's private projects is very useful as well. There are also a lot of plugins that they provide."
"The integrated portfolio and project management approach is the most valuable feature of Sciforma."
"I find Sciforma's customizability valuable."
"It makes it more fun to work with a modern designed and easy-to-use solution as a team and not add or analyze data alone. Internal, external, home office, remote work, desktop, mobile (available on iOS and Android), are always connected to One2Team."
"If I get a feature but there is not a user story, and I want to know which epic it belongs to, it is really hard to figure out."
"The kanban board could also use some more filters. We just had a project where the deployment for Jira didn't have any ETA, and it's a requirement for the client. We accommodate a lot of issues on the board, so the workaround was to create boards by project, not client."
"The team-centric view is slightly weaker in JIRA compared to its competitors, especially considering how I can evaluate how each resource has been placed, not just in one project but across JIRA."
"The interface JIRA Portfolio could improve."
"The query features should improve in JIRA Portfolio. For example, if I would have to create my own queries for looking into something such as what business features we have released last month, or the last three months, I don't know if I can do it. The solution requires a certain level of expertise."
"Requires some effort to insert functionalities and that could be simplified."
"Portfolio is easy to scale, but we've had some difficulties with it regarding compliance and support."
"The initial setup could use improvement."
"For the future AI (Artificial intelligence) must be part of a modern solution. AI is with its unique ability to monitor patterns, is a capable assistant for project managers. Artificial intelligence is being used to help with project organization on a collection of different data from multi-data sources."
"The report developer needs a bit of streamlining."
"The solution's graphical user interface (GUI) is a bit old and could be improved."
JIRA Portfolio is ranked 4th in Enterprise Agile Planning Tools with 47 reviews while Sciforma is ranked 13th in Project Portfolio Management with 3 reviews. JIRA Portfolio is rated 8.2, while Sciforma is rated 9.6. The top reviewer of JIRA Portfolio writes "Powerful, flexible solution with a bit of a learning curve". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Sciforma writes "A project management solution that can be automated to suit your needs". JIRA Portfolio is most compared with Jira Align, Oracle Primavera Portfolio Management, Microsoft Project Server, Adobe Workfront and Microsoft Azure DevOps, whereas Sciforma is most compared with Planisware and Broadcom Clarity . See our JIRA Portfolio vs. Sciforma report.
See our list of best Project Portfolio Management vendors and best Project Management Software vendors.
We monitor all Project Portfolio Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.