Compare JIRA Portfolio vs. Oracle Primavera Portfolio Management

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Most Helpful Review
Use Oracle Primavera Portfolio Management? Share your opinion.
Find out what your peers are saying about Atlassian, Planview, Microsoft and others in Project Management Software. Updated: January 2021.
455,108 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pricing and Cost Advice
"The pricing of the solution is expensive.""We only have nine people using it so we have a standard cost of $150 dollar per year. There are only additional costs if you exceed the limit of users, then you start paying by user. The cost is significantly higher.""The pricing continues to get higher.""The product is really not very expensive.""We pay our fees annually, although monthly payments are also available."

More JIRA Portfolio Pricing and Cost Advice »

Information Not Available
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Project Management Software solutions are best for your needs.
455,108 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Ranking
Views
3,134
Comparisons
1,928
Reviews
13
Average Words per Review
558
Rating
7.8
Views
1,060
Comparisons
936
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
Popular Comparisons
Compared 19% of the time.
Compared 9% of the time.
Compared 1% of the time.
Also Known As
Portfolio for JIRAPrimavera Portfolio Management, OPPM, Oracle Primavera Portfolio Management
Learn
Atlassian
Oracle
Overview

The agile portfolio management tool, built for JIRA.

With Portfolio for JIRA, you can plan and forecast a realistic roadmap, make data-informed decisions when the unexpected happens, and keep everyone in the know.

Oracle's Primavera Portfolio Management is the leading portfolio management software solution, providing unmatched flexibility and infrastructure for enterprise portfolio management. With its unique functionality, real-world enterprise scalability, and unlimited configurability, Primavera Portfolio Management is ideal for managing just about any type of portfolio from ideation through execution.
Offer
Learn more about JIRA Portfolio
Learn more about Oracle Primavera Portfolio Management
Sample Customers
Rosetta Stone, Sprint, UBS, Workday, Expedia, J.P. MorganYarra Valley Water, John Wayne Airport, Hatch Mott Macdonald, Austrian Power Grid AG, EDF France, Chiyoda Corporation, Croatian Waters, Selex ES, Chicago Park District
Top Industries
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company34%
Comms Service Provider15%
Retailer7%
Government6%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company28%
Comms Service Provider17%
Energy/Utilities Company13%
Construction Company9%
Company Size
REVIEWERS
Small Business36%
Midsize Enterprise7%
Large Enterprise57%
No Data Available
Find out what your peers are saying about Atlassian, Planview, Microsoft and others in Project Management Software. Updated: January 2021.
455,108 professionals have used our research since 2012.

JIRA Portfolio is ranked 3rd in Enterprise Agile Planning Tools with 13 reviews while Oracle Primavera Portfolio Management is ranked 12th in Project Portfolio Management. JIRA Portfolio is rated 7.8, while Oracle Primavera Portfolio Management is rated 0.0. The top reviewer of JIRA Portfolio writes "Good documentation, good visualization of tickets, and relatively stable". On the other hand, JIRA Portfolio is most compared with Microsoft Project Server, Smartsheet, Planview Enterprise One, Planview PPM Pro and Planisware, whereas Oracle Primavera Portfolio Management is most compared with EcoSys, SAP Portfolio and Project Management, Broadcom Clarity PPM, Microsoft Project Server and LoadSpring SpringBoard Cloud Portal.

See our list of best Project Management Software vendors.

We monitor all Project Management Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.