Compare JIRA Portfolio vs. Planisware

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
JIRA Portfolio Logo
3,134 views|1,928 comparisons
Planisware Logo
1,600 views|855 comparisons
Most Helpful Review
Find out what your peers are saying about Atlassian, Planview, Microsoft and others in Project Management Software. Updated: January 2021.
456,719 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pricing and Cost Advice
"The pricing of the solution is expensive.""We only have nine people using it so we have a standard cost of $150 dollar per year. There are only additional costs if you exceed the limit of users, then you start paying by user. The cost is significantly higher.""The pricing continues to get higher.""The product is really not very expensive.""We pay our fees annually, although monthly payments are also available."

More JIRA Portfolio Pricing and Cost Advice »

Information Not Available
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Project Management Software solutions are best for your needs.
456,719 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Ranking
Views
3,134
Comparisons
1,928
Reviews
13
Average Words per Review
558
Rating
7.8
Views
1,600
Comparisons
855
Reviews
1
Average Words per Review
1,626
Rating
9.0
Popular Comparisons
Compared 18% of the time.
Compared 9% of the time.
Compared 1% of the time.
Compared 15% of the time.
Compared 15% of the time.
Compared 3% of the time.
Also Known As
Portfolio for JIRA
Learn
Atlassian
Planisware
Video Not Available
Overview

The agile portfolio management tool, built for JIRA.

With Portfolio for JIRA, you can plan and forecast a realistic roadmap, make data-informed decisions when the unexpected happens, and keep everyone in the know.

Resource and cost scheduling, time tracking, risk and document management in a collaborative environment. Software solution that supports the end-to-end governance of company portfolios, from finance and resource planning, to the life cycle management of products.
Offer
Learn more about JIRA Portfolio
Learn more about Planisware
Sample Customers
Rosetta Stone, Sprint, UBS, Workday, Expedia, J.P. MorganApotex, Alstom Transport, HP, Stryker, Rexam, Jotun, Gelita, Kraton Performance Polymers, Abbvie, Rio Tinto Alcan, Maruho, Teva, SK Chemicals
Top Industries
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company33%
Comms Service Provider16%
Retailer7%
Government6%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company23%
Comms Service Provider15%
Pharma/Biotech Company12%
Construction Company8%
Company Size
REVIEWERS
Small Business36%
Midsize Enterprise7%
Large Enterprise57%
No Data Available
Find out what your peers are saying about Atlassian, Planview, Microsoft and others in Project Management Software. Updated: January 2021.
456,719 professionals have used our research since 2012.

JIRA Portfolio is ranked 3rd in Enterprise Agile Planning Tools with 13 reviews while Planisware is ranked 8th in Project Portfolio Management with 1 review. JIRA Portfolio is rated 7.8, while Planisware is rated 9.0. The top reviewer of JIRA Portfolio writes "Good documentation, good visualization of tickets, and relatively stable". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Planisware writes "Scales capably, flexiby for even complex, long-term, R&D programs and provides single-source-of-data-truth integration. SaaS is optional. ". JIRA Portfolio is most compared with Microsoft Project Server, Smartsheet, Planview Enterprise One, Planview PPM Pro and KeyedIn Projects, whereas Planisware is most compared with Microsoft Project Server, Planview Enterprise One, Broadcom Clarity PPM, Jira and Smartsheet.

See our list of best Project Management Software vendors.

We monitor all Project Management Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.