We performed a comparison between JIRA Portfolio and Procore Project Management based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about monday.com, Microsoft, Asana and others in Project Management Software."The most valuable feature of the JIRA Portfolio is the many features it provides, such as code integration, documentation, roadmap, and Eclipse. The solution is useful for product managers."
"The valuable features of the JIRA Portfolio are the customization it provides which is very useful and the Agile project management capability."
"Portfolio's most valuable features are that it's user-friendly and customer-centric."
"In a PC environment, it is quite stable."
"The solution includes good and fast notifications for other project team members."
"Portfolio helps us increase the visibility of projects' status and management with remote workers who make up most of the company."
"The solution is very stable."
"The most valuable feature of the JIRA Portfolio is for managing teams of 10 or more. It can track the program level and portfolio. There are plenty of beneficial features, such as the hierarchy-level view, customization, and structure plugin."
"The financial side of Procore Project Management is better."
"Jira has room for improvement in terms of managing various projects and linking requirements centrally under one project. They could include some add-ons that enable you to link all the requirements and put them into a centralized place. That central place should be restricted to a limited set of users with privileges based on user groups with those rights."
"When I want to embed Jira Portfolio in a complete HLI cycle, I'm missing things to evaluate my ethic into my value stream."
"I think their view needs to be more user friendly. The UI makes it difficult to find things. Secondly, the configuration is very complex. JIRA should help people find out what configuration they are using."
"If I get a feature but there is not a user story, and I want to know which epic it belongs to, it is really hard to figure out."
"We had to use assistance for the initial setup."
"We would love to be able to have direct contact with Atlassian. Currently, they are not working directly with West African countries. We are considering using JIRA Align, but when we contact them, they say that as we are in West Africa, they don't directly work with West Africa."
"Their interface is a little unique and I think that's partly because the core of the product has morphed into several sub-products, but the underlying architecture has stayed the same on all of them in that it was originally a help desk ticketing system. It's a very tech-focused product and that's fair given its origins, but if they really want to expand their community of users, then they're going to have to move beyond that a little bit and polish it up."
"JIRA Portfolio could improve new implementation because if I want integration for the complete wide frame tools it cannot provide any wide frame tools."
"It would be nice if the tool can reduce its operational cost. It would make it more competitive."
JIRA Portfolio is ranked 4th in Enterprise Agile Planning Tools with 47 reviews while Procore Project Management is ranked 24th in Project Management Software with 1 review. JIRA Portfolio is rated 8.2, while Procore Project Management is rated 9.0. The top reviewer of JIRA Portfolio writes "Powerful, flexible solution with a bit of a learning curve". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Procore Project Management writes "Helps with project management and offers good value for money". JIRA Portfolio is most compared with Jira Align, Oracle Primavera Portfolio Management, Microsoft Project Server, Adobe Workfront and Microsoft Azure DevOps, whereas Procore Project Management is most compared with EcoSys, SAP Portfolio and Project Management, Asana, Planview PPM Pro and Meridian Proliance PPM.
See our list of best Project Management Software vendors.
We monitor all Project Management Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
