Anonymous UserSenior Management Consultant at a consultancy
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
"The graphics and the resolution of the work are very good."
"With JIRA, you can do amazing things by developing connectors, embedding features, and adding new fields to create new things."
"The developers can simplify tasks and each one of them can undertake a task and then they continue with development. Our processes are more efficient and easier for our manager and developers to track them. Their work is more organized."
"The dashboard is the most valuable feature. The user experience is very good, it's easy to use."
"The product's centralized database creates a single source of data for working groups so no data needs to be reconciled."
"The product makes it easy to collaborate even though it can use some improvement in that area."
"The integration is very good. We've more or less integrated with everything including reporting and registering."
"The customized workflows we can define are very valuable. JIRA's private projects is very useful as well. There are also a lot of plugins that they provide."
"The integration portion with SAP models is valuable."
"If I get a feature but there is not a user story, and I want to know which epic it belongs to, it is really hard to figure out."
"This solution is not able to be integrated with other solutions because you have to upgrade it and pay for more licensing."
"I think that front-end development is a little bit buggy in some cases. Some of the features take a while to respond and some need to be more clear."
"The initial setup could use improvement."
"The product could do with more flexible reporting."
"Some key features like integration, big data warehousing and data modeling need work."
"The workflow needs improvement."
"I think their view needs to be more user friendly. The UI makes it difficult to find things. Secondly, the configuration is very complex. JIRA should help people find out what configuration they are using."
"It would be valuable if SAP integrated seamlessly with some products like Jira and Bitbucket."
"The pricing of the solution is expensive."
"We only have nine people using it so we have a standard cost of $150 dollar per year. There are only additional costs if you exceed the limit of users, then you start paying by user. The cost is significantly higher."
"The pricing continues to get higher."
"The product is really not very expensive."
"We pay our fees annually, although monthly payments are also available."
The agile portfolio management tool, built for JIRA.
With Portfolio for JIRA, you can plan and forecast a realistic roadmap, make data-informed decisions when the unexpected happens, and keep everyone in the know.
JIRA Portfolio is ranked 4th in Enterprise Agile Planning Tools with 13 reviews while SAP Portfolio and Project Management is ranked 10th in Project Portfolio Management with 1 review. JIRA Portfolio is rated 7.8, while SAP Portfolio and Project Management is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of JIRA Portfolio writes "Good documentation, good visualization of tickets, and relatively stable". On the other hand, the top reviewer of SAP Portfolio and Project Management writes "Integrates well with SAP models, but doesn't integrate with performance trackers like Jira". JIRA Portfolio is most compared with Microsoft Project Server, Planview Enterprise One, Smartsheet, Planview PPM Pro and Trello, whereas SAP Portfolio and Project Management is most compared with Microsoft Project Server, Planview Enterprise One, Jira, Broadcom Clarity PPM and Planisware.
See our list of best Project Management Software vendors.
We monitor all Project Management Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.