We performed a comparison between JIRA Portfolio and SAP Portfolio and Project Management based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, GitLab, Atlassian and others in Enterprise Agile Planning Tools."We have found the solution to be stable."
"The most valuable features of Jira are the dashboards where we see all the features lined up with the release dates in the portfolio view, it is very good."
"The most valuable feature of JIRA Portfolio is the visuals it provides rather than Kanban boarded tickets."
"With JIRA, you can do amazing things by developing connectors, embedding features, and adding new fields to create new things."
"The most valuable feature is that it fits very well into an agile framework, and it is especially helpful with the planning aspects."
"I use it to plan and schedule the things I take care of. I can create and share a document if I want to discuss new ideas with my team remotely."
"Has many functionalities including good supervision and workflows."
"Portfolio's best feature is integration with other JIRA products."
"The integration portion with SAP models is valuable."
"SAP is gradually introducing more flexibility and customization options to the system, allowing users to adapt it to their specific needs."
"The workflow needs improvement."
"Our major team does not control or manage JIRA server well since sometimes there is trouble using the solution, which is a problem. The solution's speed needs to be improved."
"Their interface is a little unique and I think that's partly because the core of the product has morphed into several sub-products, but the underlying architecture has stayed the same on all of them in that it was originally a help desk ticketing system. It's a very tech-focused product and that's fair given its origins, but if they really want to expand their community of users, then they're going to have to move beyond that a little bit and polish it up."
"We are using the on-premise deployment, but it is slower and not as easy to manage as the cloud version."
"Some key features like integration, big data warehousing and data modeling need work."
"With Jira, an issue that arises is the length of time it takes to show certain data."
"When I want to embed Jira Portfolio in a complete HLI cycle, I'm missing things to evaluate my ethic into my value stream."
"In the next release, Portfolio should include more metrics and develop their portfolio planning."
"The system is old, so there are several issues that arise when we fetch data from integrated systems. Sometimes the data gets stuck, and there are instances where we need to access multiple pieces of information simultaneously."
"It would be valuable if SAP integrated seamlessly with some products like Jira and Bitbucket."
JIRA Portfolio is ranked 4th in Enterprise Agile Planning Tools with 46 reviews while SAP Portfolio and Project Management is ranked 9th in Project Portfolio Management with 4 reviews. JIRA Portfolio is rated 8.0, while SAP Portfolio and Project Management is rated 9.0. The top reviewer of JIRA Portfolio writes "Powerful, flexible solution with a bit of a learning curve". On the other hand, the top reviewer of SAP Portfolio and Project Management writes "End-to-end project management capabilities and offers seamless vendor and client contract alignment". JIRA Portfolio is most compared with Jira Align, Oracle Primavera Portfolio Management, Microsoft Project Server, Adobe Workfront and Microsoft Azure DevOps, whereas SAP Portfolio and Project Management is most compared with EcoSys, Jira, ServiceNow Strategic Portfolio Management, Asana and Planisware.
We monitor all Enterprise Agile Planning Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.