We performed a comparison between JIRA Portfolio and Sciforma based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Project Portfolio Management solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The solution has good reporting and is very user-friendly."
"The dashboard is the most valuable feature. The user experience is very good, it's easy to use."
"Version management is the most valuable feature of JIRA Portfolio."
"Having an option to view dependencies between projects and teams is great."
"The most valuable feature of JIRA Portfolio is the visuals it provides rather than Kanban boarded tickets."
"The documentation is very well done."
"The product's centralized database creates a single source of data for working groups so no data needs to be reconciled."
"In general, the valuable features of the tool are its capabilities concerning dependency reports and task status."
"It makes it more fun to work with a modern designed and easy-to-use solution as a team and not add or analyze data alone. Internal, external, home office, remote work, desktop, mobile (available on iOS and Android), are always connected to One2Team."
"I find Sciforma's customizability valuable."
"The integrated portfolio and project management approach is the most valuable feature of Sciforma."
"The workflow needs improvement."
"I think their view needs to be more user friendly. The UI makes it difficult to find things. Secondly, the configuration is very complex. JIRA should help people find out what configuration they are using."
"We had to use assistance for the initial setup."
"The reporting and dashboard capabilities have room for improvement."
"In the next release, Portfolio should include more metrics and develop their portfolio planning."
"The HR aspect of the solution could be improved."
"I think that front-end development is a little bit buggy in some cases. Some of the features take a while to respond and some need to be more clear."
"The solution's look and feel could be a bit more intuitive and user friendly."
"The report developer needs a bit of streamlining."
"For the future AI (Artificial intelligence) must be part of a modern solution. AI is with its unique ability to monitor patterns, is a capable assistant for project managers. Artificial intelligence is being used to help with project organization on a collection of different data from multi-data sources."
"The solution's graphical user interface (GUI) is a bit old and could be improved."
JIRA Portfolio is ranked 4th in Enterprise Agile Planning Tools with 47 reviews while Sciforma is ranked 13th in Project Portfolio Management with 3 reviews. JIRA Portfolio is rated 8.2, while Sciforma is rated 9.6. The top reviewer of JIRA Portfolio writes "Powerful, flexible solution with a bit of a learning curve". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Sciforma writes "A project management solution that can be automated to suit your needs". JIRA Portfolio is most compared with Jira Align, Oracle Primavera Portfolio Management, Microsoft Project Server, Adobe Workfront and Microsoft Azure DevOps, whereas Sciforma is most compared with Planisware and Broadcom Clarity . See our JIRA Portfolio vs. Sciforma report.
See our list of best Project Portfolio Management vendors and best Project Management Software vendors.
We monitor all Project Portfolio Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
