Most Helpful Review
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
"It has an easy UI that can easily plug-in to every level."
"This tool can be used anywhere and on any device."
"The most valuable feature is the flexibility of the configuration, being able to configure it to suit your own needs."
"The features that we find most valuable are the Workflow, Scrum workflow, and Dashboards."
"The most valuable feature is the full integration between Work management, Source code management, and Test Automation."
"The most valuable features are the customized Dashboard, Sprint Planning, and Automatic Notifications."
"The most valuable feature is the Burndown Chart to see work that is outstanding."
"This solution assists us with being able to quickly and easily start sprints and keep accurate track of them, including billing using a time-tracking add-on."
"Has a powerful workflow engine that allows creation of workflow complexities and processes."
"The CACD solutions on JIRA has some plugins, but they are not easily understandable or workable."
"The user interface and views on different devices should be improved."
"The plugin management needs a lot of work."
"It would be very useful to have drag and drop time tracking."
"The hierarchy for Jira tickets is too flat."
"This solution would be improved with the inclusion of integration with SVN, and auto-sync with the build release number."
"The reporting needs to be improved."
"The permissions can be challenging to get right."
"The solution can sometimes be a little inflexible and a bit caustic."
Pricing and Cost Advice
"We feel that the product is a good value for the cost."
"Licensing is on a monthly basis, and it is based on what you use."
"To try this solution, use their cloud offering to get familiar. After that, it's in my view worth the money."
"I don't feel that price is an issue."
"It is not too expensive. It is just comparative to other tools like Microsoft Teams."
"I am not sure if the client is using a commercial version. I think it is on a per-user basis, and it is around 15 Canadian dollars for a user, but I'm not sure. It also has a free version."
"As a company, we get a subsidized price, and it's lower than what's quoted on their website."
"We are using the enterprise license which is nice because it ensures that we always have the latest versions of Jira software."
Information Not Available
Questions from the Community
Top Answer: Hi, @Cheryl Joseph Micro Focus Project and Portfolio Management solution could be a good candidate, see my review on this product, or if you may need more information to drop me a message. You can… more »
out of 33 in Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites
Average Words per Review
out of 29 in Project Portfolio Management
Average Words per Review
Compared 49% of the time.
Compared 10% of the time.
Compared 8% of the time.
Compared 5% of the time.
Compared 4% of the time.
Compared 39% of the time.
Compared 15% of the time.
Compared 13% of the time.
Compared 10% of the time.
Compared 9% of the time.
Also Known As
|Jira Software||HPE Project and Portfolio Management, HPE PPM|
JIRA has multiple deployment options to provide the flexibility your organization needs.
Cloud is a fully hosted service for customers who want to iterate quickly and have us take care of managing the infrastructure.
For customers who need to run our applications behind their firewall, we have Server and Data Center options. Server delivers greater capacity for a larger user base and gives you more control, allowing you to remain compliant with your enterprise IT, security, IP and privacy policies. For our largest customers, Data Center provides all the capability of our Server option, along with high availability, instant scalability and performance at scale.
Atlassian also offers premium support and strategic services for enterprise customers. Technical Account Managers are cross-functional technical advisors providing proactive planning and strategic guidance across your organization. Premier Support goes above and beyond our standard offerings to give you account-wide support from a team of senior support engineers.
|HPE Project and Portfolio Management (PPM) provides critical information in real time to help you make the right investment decisions. It standardizes, manages, and captures the execution of project and operational activities as well as resources.|
Learn more about Jira
Learn more about Micro Focus Project and Portfolio Management (PPM)
|Square, Nasa, eBay, Cisco, SalesForce, Adobe, BNP Paribas, BMW and LinkedIn, Pfizer, Citi.||Bank Simpanan Nasional, Smart Communications, Aareon AG|
Computer Software Company14%
Financial Services Firm13%
Comms Service Provider8%
Computer Software Company31%
Comms Service Provider16%
Financial Services Firm6%
Financial Services Firm38%
Computer Software Company53%
Comms Service Provider10%
Financial Services Firm5%
Jira is ranked 1st in Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites with 51 reviews while Micro Focus Project and Portfolio Management (PPM) is ranked 9th in Project Portfolio Management with 1 review. Jira is rated 8.2, while Micro Focus Project and Portfolio Management (PPM) is rated 10.0. The top reviewer of Jira writes "Flexible and very easy to set up but can get quite complex". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Micro Focus Project and Portfolio Management (PPM) writes "Provides a good balance of flexibility and functionality; very powerful". Jira is most compared with Microsoft Azure DevOps, TFS, Micro Focus ALM Octane, Rally Software and IBM Rational DOORS, whereas Micro Focus Project and Portfolio Management (PPM) is most compared with Broadcom Clarity PPM, ITM Platform, JIRA Portfolio, Microsoft Project Server and ServiceNow IT Business Management.
See our list of .
We monitor all Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.