Most Helpful Review
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Transparency of development projects, as well as approval processes for some business projects, has improved massively.
The most valuable feature of this solution is the source linking on the commit level to git.
This solution assists us with being able to quickly and easily start sprints and keep accurate track of them, including billing using a time-tracking add-on.
The most valuable feature is the Burndown Chart to see work that is outstanding.
The most valuable features are the customized Dashboard, Sprint Planning, and Automatic Notifications.
The most valuable feature is the full integration between Work management, Source code management, and Test Automation.
The features that we find most valuable are the Workflow, Scrum workflow, and Dashboards.
The most valuable feature is the flexibility of the configuration, being able to configure it to suit your own needs.
It is a scalable solution. We have been able to manage larger scale projects easily using this solution.
It is easily adaptable. In addition, it is easily used on mobile applications.
We are able to know what we are doing, how much we have spent, how much time we've taken, and it tells us how much money is left for the project. It also tells us whether we are below or above our expenditures, whether we are below or above our budget.
The key things are managing interactions, resource allocation, resource-leveling (enterprise) and as a collaborative tool, because we use it across multiple projects at a time.
A single place for all our organisation's project records.
Deliverables List: Most useful to enable meaningful status reporting at an enterprise level.
SharePoint site integration
My main concern is the administration of projects, especially user groups, and this requires root access rights but there is no concept of layered admin rights.
Backlog pruning and visualization are poor.
The permissions can be challenging to get right.
The reporting needs to be improved.
This solution would be improved with the inclusion of integration with SVN, and auto-sync with the build release number.
The hierarchy for Jira tickets is too flat.
It would be very useful to have drag and drop time tracking.
The plugin management needs a lot of work.
It may be considered expensive.
In terms of tech support, it took a long time for them to resolve a ticket.
When a lot of users logged onto the site, it took a big toll on the service. Therefore, there is a scalability issue.
Work needs to be done on collaboration with SharePoint.
It has to be more user-friendly. For instance, there should be some assistance, like when you go to certain sites, people pop up and say, "Can we help you? What are you looking for?" It's not interactive enough.
EPM 2010 UI seems a bit dated now that 2016 is available.
Permission management needs improvement.
Pricing and Cost Advice
To try this solution, use their cloud offering to get familiar. After that, it's in my view worth the money.
Licensing is on a monthly basis, and it is based on what you use.
We feel that the product is a good value for the cost.
I understand JIRA is quite expensive.
It does not cost that much.
Almost everybody uses JIRA nowadays because it is the most cost-effective solution.
It has features that cannot be bought by other rivals, so cost does not matter.
The licensing was procured before my involvement.
I think they need more flexibility with licensing, because there are preconceived ideas that don't allow as much flexibility with the various licenses.
out of 75 in Project Management Software
Average Words per Review
out of 24 in Project Portfolio Management
Average Words per Review
Compared 34% of the time.
Compared 19% of the time.
Compared 7% of the time.
Compared 16% of the time.
Compared 13% of the time.
Compared 11% of the time.
Also Known As
|JIRA Software||MS Project Server|
JIRA has multiple deployment options to provide the flexibility your organization needs.
Cloud is a fully hosted service for customers who want to iterate quickly and have us take care of managing the infrastructure.
For customers who need to run our applications behind their firewall, we have Server and Data Center options. Server delivers greater capacity for a larger user base and gives you more control, allowing you to remain compliant with your enterprise IT, security, IP and privacy policies. For our largest customers, Data Center provides all the capability of our Server option, along with high availability, instant scalability and performance at scale.
Atlassian also offers premium support and strategic services for enterprise customers. Technical Account Managers are cross-functional technical advisors providing proactive planning and strategic guidance across your organization. Premier Support goes above and beyond our standard offerings to give you account-wide support from a team of senior support engineers.
|Microsoft Project Server 2013 is a flexible on-premises solution for project portfolio management (PPM) and everyday work. Team members, project participants, and business decision makers can get started, prioritize project portfolio investments and deliver the intended business value from virtually anywhere. Requires SharePoint 2013, sold separately.|
Learn more about JIRA
Learn more about Microsoft Project Server
|Square, Nasa, eBay, Cisco, SalesForce, Adobe, BNP Paribas, BMW and LinkedIn, Pfizer, Citi.||Magnachip, Gwinnett County Schools, CLEAResult, Medbit Oy, Intelbras S.A., ETS, CORE Construction, Keller Foundations|
Financial Services Firm17%
Software R&D Company14%
Software R&D Company18%
Financial Services Firm14%
Comms Service Provider9%
Financial Services Firm38%