We performed a comparison between Jira and Parasoft Development Testing Platform based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Atlassian, Nutanix and others in Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites."I liked the flexibility of the application. It was pretty user-friendly."
"The dashboards are useful."
"The informatics is the most valuable feature. It captures what we need."
"Jira has been a good l tool for collaborating across large groups of people. The JQL feature is powerful and easy to use."
"Powerful features including a good reporting capability."
"The most valuable feature is the full integration between Work management, Source code management, and Test Automation."
"In general, the GUI is nice."
"In terms of product management, Jira increases productivity and visibility into the product. Those are the top benefits this tool provides to the team. Also, it's accessible to the executives and whoever wants to sign on to Jira to see what's going on."
"The most valuable feature is code coverage."
"It really helps developers execute scenarios through DTP and share reports/results across the teams."
"The reporting tool and the approval tool need work."
"The solution could be more user-friendly."
"There are no fields to search or to filter by, mainly the ones which use a data around a date and time when something changes."
"Some small issues with stability."
"The integration could be better in Jira."
"It would be very useful to have drag and drop time tracking."
"I would like to see it connecting to Git. That could be useful. We use it for Stash, but I think there is one for Git also. I don't know if it's a plug-in that exists already, but that could be nice."
"The thing I don't like is that it is hard to decide which dropdown options should be selected. When we try and submit it, it will state that there are certain mandates in place. It won't allow us to submit the form unless we fill out all the details."
"Parallel execution: It would help it multiple executions could be done at the same time."
"The solution's speed has room for improvement."
Jira is ranked 2nd in Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites with 254 reviews while Parasoft Development Testing Platform is ranked 15th in Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites with 4 reviews. Jira is rated 8.0, while Parasoft Development Testing Platform is rated 8.6. The top reviewer of Jira writes "A great centralized tool that has a good agile framework and is useful for day-to-day planning, task management, and work log efficacy". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Parasoft Development Testing Platform writes "Provides 100 percent code coverage, is stable, and scalable". Jira is most compared with Microsoft Azure DevOps, IBM Rational DOORS, OpenText ALM Octane, Rally Software and Polarion ALM, whereas Parasoft Development Testing Platform is most compared with Codebeamer.
See our list of best Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites vendors and best Application Requirements Management vendors.
We monitor all Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.