We performed a comparison between Jira and PTC Integrity Requirements Connector based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about IBM, Atlassian, Siemens and others in Application Requirements Management."Great for tracking my development team's productivity."
"Kanban board: The board is easy to use and visually impressive to non-IT users, who found it easy to relate to."
"The board has been a very valuable feature because it can be very simple for teams that are not technical. It can also be highly technical and have lots of data for teams that are technical. So we use it for both instances."
"It is easy to deploy in the cloud and other environments. It is also easy to view the reports of the sprint review or the sprint plan and the relation between the backlog and the repositories."
"I've never had a bug or a bug message that I needed to open a ticket for."
"With the help of Jira, tasks are less likely to remain stagnant for a long time. We always see them somewhere on the board."
"I like seeing which tickets are open and what our response rate is. They have a lot of good metrics in their system to see what's going on."
"The feature that I have found most valuable is that it is a quite powerful user tracking system."
"It is a stable solution...I rate the support a nine out of ten."
"There are some minor quirks, such as zero-point stories not appearing in the portfolio scope."
"This solution would be improved with the inclusion of integration with SVN, and auto-sync with the build release number."
"There are a limited number of gadgets accessible in Jira; thus, additional ones should be supported."
"I find the dashboard to be Jira's most problematic feature."
"I'd like some more features around software testing. I'd like to see some more stuff done around data testing. That's what I'm most interested in."
"The reporting tool and the approval tool need work."
"It can have a more high-level view of portfolios. It has quite detailed views, but I would like a high-level view of portfolios. We want to integrate Jira with Microsoft Active Directory, and I don't know how easy or hard it is going to be. I don't know if Jira supports this. We are starting that integration in the last quarter of this year. I hope to find all the required tools for this integration."
"Not very intuitive for project admins."
"The training material for PTC Integrity should be made a little bit easier or more useful for the user."
Jira is ranked 2nd in Application Requirements Management with 243 reviews while PTC Integrity Requirements Connector is ranked 6th in Application Requirements Management with 1 review. Jira is rated 8.0, while PTC Integrity Requirements Connector is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Jira writes "A great centralized tool that has a good agile framework and is useful for day-to-day planning, task management, and work log efficacy". On the other hand, the top reviewer of PTC Integrity Requirements Connector writes "A requirement management tool that provides a good technical support along with stability". Jira is most compared with Microsoft Azure DevOps, IBM Rational DOORS, OpenText ALM Octane, Polarion ALM and Rally Software, whereas PTC Integrity Requirements Connector is most compared with IBM Rational DOORS and IBM Rational DOORS Next Generation.
See our list of best Application Requirements Management vendors.
We monitor all Application Requirements Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.