Compare Jira vs. Wrike
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros | |
"It has an easy UI that can easily plug-in to every level." "This tool can be used anywhere and on any device." "The most valuable feature is the flexibility of the configuration, being able to configure it to suit your own needs." "The features that we find most valuable are the Workflow, Scrum workflow, and Dashboards." "The most valuable feature is the full integration between Work management, Source code management, and Test Automation." "The most valuable features are the customized Dashboard, Sprint Planning, and Automatic Notifications." "The most valuable feature is the Burndown Chart to see work that is outstanding." "This solution assists us with being able to quickly and easily start sprints and keep accurate track of them, including billing using a time-tracking add-on." | "This is a good tool for project progress tracking and sharing tasks with internal and external parties." "It's a very easy-to-use and flexible tool. We can easily write and create queues for different themes. It's very user-friendly." |
Cons | |
"The CACD solutions on JIRA has some plugins, but they are not easily understandable or workable." "The user interface and views on different devices should be improved." "The plugin management needs a lot of work." "It would be very useful to have drag and drop time tracking." "The hierarchy for Jira tickets is too flat." "This solution would be improved with the inclusion of integration with SVN, and auto-sync with the build release number." "The reporting needs to be improved." "The permissions can be challenging to get right." | "We faced an issue with the Wrike outlook add-on; it is only available for Microsoft Office 365, and not the on-premise version." "On one side, it's very easy to create a task with text, but on the other side, it's not very well-formatted. Therefore, it's difficult to track specific data written in a task. We are making templates, but it's not enough to use a template to know the exact status of different tasks. One thing that we are looking for in Wrike is a better workflow. Because we can only move the status of tasks, we can't really manage workflow and send a task to a specific person. This is what is really missing in Wrike as compared to other tools. We are looking to replace Wrike because we need support for workflow. Another issue with Wrike is that they bring a lot of versions of the tool, which it's not so easy. They bring new versions very frequently, and these versions look similar. For example, we are using robots to read the tasks in the tools, which is problematic with Wrike because it is changing very frequently." |
Pricing and Cost Advice | |
"We feel that the product is a good value for the cost." "Licensing is on a monthly basis, and it is based on what you use." "To try this solution, use their cloud offering to get familiar. After that, it's in my view worth the money." "I don't feel that price is an issue." "It is not too expensive. It is just comparative to other tools like Microsoft Teams." "I am not sure if the client is using a commercial version. I think it is on a per-user basis, and it is around 15 Canadian dollars for a user, but I'm not sure. It also has a free version." "As a company, we get a subsidized price, and it's lower than what's quoted on their website." "We are using the enterprise license which is nice because it ensures that we always have the latest versions of Jira software." | "Wrike is not so expensive, but I don't know exactly how it compares with other tools. Wrike might not be so cheap when we are using it for a lot of users." |
 Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Project Portfolio Management solutions are best for your needs. 456,249 professionals have used our research since 2012. | |
Questions from the Community | |
Top Answer: Glad to see your post!!
In the recent Microfocus version does Microfocus one UFT integration possible with Jira. If so How it is possible and how effective it is? | |
Ranking  | |
Views 69,667 Comparisons 60,798 Reviews 50 Average Words per Review 430 Rating 8.3 | Views 2,066 Comparisons 1,560 Reviews 2 Average Words per Review 472 Rating 7.5 |
Popular Comparisons | |
 Compared 49% of the time. Compared 10% of the time.  Compared 8% of the time.  Compared 5% of the time.  Compared 4% of the time. |  Compared 19% of the time. Compared 12% of the time.  Compared 12% of the time.  Compared 9% of the time.  Compared 6% of the time. |
Also Known As | |
| Jira Software | |
Learn | |
| Atlassian | Wrike |
Overview | |
JIRA has multiple deployment options to provide the flexibility your organization needs. Cloud is a fully hosted service for customers who want to iterate quickly and have us take care of managing the infrastructure. For customers who need to run our applications behind their firewall, we have Server and Data Center options. Server delivers greater capacity for a larger user base and gives you more control, allowing you to remain compliant with your enterprise IT, security, IP and privacy policies. For our largest customers, Data Center provides all the capability of our Server option, along with high availability, instant scalability and performance at scale. Atlassian also offers premium support and strategic services for enterprise customers. Technical Account Managers are cross-functional technical advisors providing proactive planning and strategic guidance across your organization. Premier Support goes above and beyond our standard offerings to give you account-wide support from a team of senior support engineers. | Wrike is an online collaboration and project management software bringing together centralized task management and social collaboration features into one real-time workspace. It connects tasks, discussions, and emails to your actual project plan. You get an up-to-date picture of the project and can keep your team aligned with your strategy without boring status meetings. Challenges Wrike helps solve:
Why Wrike?
|
Offer | |
Learn more about Jira | Learn more about Wrike |
Sample Customers | |
| Square, Nasa, eBay, Cisco, SalesForce, Adobe, BNP Paribas, BMW and LinkedIn, Pfizer, Citi. | Down Association, Clever Clicks, Sevenly, Palatov Motorsport, LLC, Koch Ink, Opportunity To Do, Quark Software Inc., Transamerican Auto Parts, PlumChoiceÂ, Inc., InScribe, Evisions, Giant Steps, TechRepublic |
Top Industries | |
Computer Software Company14% Insurance Company13% Financial Services Firm13% Healthcare Company8% Computer Software Company31% Comms Service Provider16% Manufacturing Company7% Financial Services Firm6% | Religious Institution17% Marketing Services Firm14% Transportation Company9% Comms Service Provider9% Computer Software Company22% Comms Service Provider15% Retailer8% Real Estate/Law Firm8% |
Company Size | |
Small Business33% Midsize Enterprise19% Large Enterprise49% Small Business12% Midsize Enterprise14% Large Enterprise74% | Small Business73% Midsize Enterprise15% Large Enterprise13% |
Find out what your peers are saying about Jira vs. Wrike and other solutions. Updated: January 2021.
456,249 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Jira is ranked 1st in Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites with 51 reviews while Wrike is ranked 11th in Project Management Software with 2 reviews. Jira is rated 8.2, while Wrike is rated 7.6. The top reviewer of Jira writes "Flexible and very easy to set up but can get quite complex". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Wrike writes "Flexible and easy-to-use but lacks real workflow support and tasks management feature". Jira is most compared with Microsoft Azure DevOps, TFS, Micro Focus ALM Octane, Rally Software and IBM Rational DOORS, whereas Wrike is most compared with monday.com, Broadcom Clarity PPM, Smartsheet, Asana and JIRA Portfolio. See our Jira vs. Wrike report.
See our list of best Project Portfolio Management vendors and best Project Management Software vendors.
We monitor all Project Portfolio Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.