We performed a comparison between Jitterbit Harmony and Matillion ETL based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Amazon Web Services (AWS), MuleSoft, Matillion and others in Cloud Data Integration."It runs like an appliance and has tremendous throughput."
"Easy integration with Salesforce"
"The fluid user interface (probably the most user friendly interface, when compared to its competitors)."
"Jitterbit provides the ability to quickly map data between files and databases."
"It is a scalable solution."
"Integrity, ease of use, user-friendly user interface, and errorless logs are the most valuable features."
"We only use small parts of the solution, however, the parts that we use are quite adequate."
"Jitterbit handles the most lines of data in a .csv and loads the quickest of any data loader I have tried."
"It has helped us to get onto the cloud quickly."
"The loading of data is the most valuable feature of Matillion ETL."
"The most valuable feature of Matillion ETL is its user-friendly graphical interface."
"Matillion ETL is one hundred percent stable."
"Matillion ETL helps manage data movement, ingestion, and transformation through pipelines."
"It's been able to do everything we require."
"Matillion ETL has great Git integration that is perfect and convenient to use."
"We allow non-technical people to use Matillion to load data into our data warehouse for reporting. Thus, it is easy enough to use that we don't always have to get a technical person involved in setting up a data movement (ETL)."
"I would like the ability to offer a dedicated cloud version for security."
"You need to have some development skills or hire a Jitterbit engineer to make changes."
"Sometimes we experience disconnections and I have to close all Jitterbit programs."
"Looping through complex data structures can be difficult."
"The initial setup can be a little bit difficult."
"Its API management capabilities need improvement."
"I know with Salesforce updating the UI like they did, it slowed it down a lot."
"There were some bugs in the product. For example if you run a delete query and test, it deletes the actual data."
"I am looking forward to seeing the expansion of the source range for their data loader product."
"Sometimes, we have issues with the solution's stability and need to restart it for three weeks or more."
"When using the SQL loader type there were not a lot of pre-processing features for the data. For example, if there is a table with twenty columns, but we only want to load ten columns. In that case, we can use a security script to select the specific columns needed. However, if we want to perform extensive pre-processing of the data, I faced some challenges with Matillion ETL. I did not encounter many challenges, but my overall experience is limited as I only have three years of experience."
"In the next release, we would like to have connections to more databases."
"The tool's lineage is very weak."
"Going forward, I would like them to add custom jobs, since we still have to run these outside of Matillion."
"It needs integration with more data sources."
"The current version is a bit more limited because it's on a virtual machine, and everything executes on that one virtual machine."
Jitterbit Harmony is ranked 18th in Cloud Data Integration with 13 reviews while Matillion ETL is ranked 4th in Cloud Data Integration with 24 reviews. Jitterbit Harmony is rated 8.6, while Matillion ETL is rated 8.6. The top reviewer of Jitterbit Harmony writes "An easy-to-setup solution with good stability ". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Matillion ETL writes "Efficient data integration and transformation with seamless cloud-native integration". Jitterbit Harmony is most compared with MuleSoft Composer, Azure Data Factory, Microsoft Azure Logic Apps, Mule Anypoint Platform and SnapLogic, whereas Matillion ETL is most compared with Snowflake, Azure Data Factory, AWS Glue, Informatica PowerCenter and SSIS.
See our list of best Cloud Data Integration vendors.
We monitor all Cloud Data Integration reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
