Jitterbit Harmony vs Microsoft Azure Logic Apps comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Jitterbit Logo
472 views|402 comparisons
100% willing to recommend
Microsoft Logo
5,970 views|2,803 comparisons
93% willing to recommend
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Jitterbit Harmony and Microsoft Azure Logic Apps based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about MuleSoft, Microsoft, Oracle and others in Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS).
To learn more, read our detailed Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) Report (Updated: April 2024).
768,578 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"Jitterbit provides the ability to quickly map data between files and databases.""It is very easy to build integrations and processes to pull and push data.""Jitterbit handles the most lines of data in a .csv and loads the quickest of any data loader I have tried.""The Cloud Console for monitoring and troubleshooting data operations.""It runs like an appliance and has tremendous throughput.""The fluid user interface (probably the most user friendly interface, when compared to its competitors).""Easy integration with Salesforce""We only use small parts of the solution, however, the parts that we use are quite adequate."

More Jitterbit Harmony Pros →

"The most valuable features of Microsoft Azure Logic Apps are the triggering based on certain events. You can trigger a Logic App and put your logic behind it and take certain actions. The actions could be anything based on the business logic. For example, if you say something happens, an order comes in, and the order can sit in one of the Azure services. Whenever an order comes in, the Logic App can go look and trigger an event. You can write your logic inside your Logic App and it works similar to a workflow.""Connectors are very useful for streamlining data integration tasks.""Logic Apps helped reduce complexity or development time. For example, if we get documents in the form of images, we can use Logic Apps to extract information from those images. This simplifies our efforts compared to originally using Microsoft APIs to do the same task.""Its integration capabilities are great, allowing connectivity with various applications and services.""The most valuable feature of Microsoft Azure Logic Apps is the many available connectors that make automation easy. Additionally, the security of the solution is good.""I like the ability within Logic Apps to design the workbooks through the portal with minimal code.""The design is highly beneficial. It functions as a sandbox environment.""The product's most valuable feature is scalability."

More Microsoft Azure Logic Apps Pros →

Cons
"In the past few months, there have been some server downtimes during work hours that have affected some critical scheduled integrations.""Its API management capabilities need improvement.""You need to have some development skills or hire a Jitterbit engineer to make changes.""I would like the ability to offer a dedicated cloud version for security.""Sometimes we experience disconnections and I have to close all Jitterbit programs.""The initial setup can be a little bit difficult.""Sometimes additional connectors are needed.""I know with Salesforce updating the UI like they did, it slowed it down a lot."

More Jitterbit Harmony Cons →

"The product needs improvement in getting direct access to the code and versioning.""Standard documents are fine, but in certain situations, when facing specific errors or issues, partners or consumers expect customized solutions rather than just links to existing documents.""It's for a limited kind of application or short Apps. And, not for the complex applications.""I find the current interface useful, but I could see how others would want the UI bits that are used for creating Logic Apps to be simplified.""Microsoft Azure Logic Apps could have more customization options for connectors.""The visual tool that is used to build integration is quite old.""Microsoft Azure Logic Apps can improve by continually updating the connectors to make them better.""The scalability could be improved."

More Microsoft Azure Logic Apps Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "Each business needs to determine if it is a mission critical aspect."
  • "The added bonus is that Jitterbit doesn't charge for any data volume/traffic."
  • "I do believe Jitterbit has one of the better pricing and licensing options out there compared to its competitors."
  • "Jitterbit was extremely cost effective for us compared to other options."
  • "The Jitterbit price is based upon endpoints. They also offer ERP connectors with their Enterprise edition"
  • "The solution's cost is mid-ranged compared to other vendors."
  • More Jitterbit Harmony Pricing and Cost Advice →

  • "The cost of the solution could be cheaper."
  • "If we are comparing to other public cloud vendors, such as Amazon or Google Cloud platform, I wouldn't say that it's expensive. However, when we're comparing between a host such as GoDaddy or Digital Ocean, then it's a bit on the expensive side."
  • "It's very cheap, but it comes with pluses and minuses. The positive thing is that it's very cheap, but on the other hand, it's extremely hard to tell how much it will cost. At the start of the project, it's almost impossible to tell how many times you will be calling some kind of Logic App function. You cannot state how much of the internet transfer you will use or how much data your will use."
  • "The price of Microsoft Azure Logic Apps is inexpensive."
  • "Microsoft Azure Logic Apps could be costly if a user isn't careful. The costs associated with the solution could still be improved."
  • "The product is not cheap. I would rate the product's pricing a five out of ten."
  • "The pricing is not expensive."
  • "The pricing is okay. It's not highly priced. It's in the medium range."
  • More Microsoft Azure Logic Apps Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) solutions are best for your needs.
    768,578 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Top Answer:The solution's cost is mid-ranged compared to other vendors. I rate its pricing a six out of ten.
    Top Answer:The solution's API management capabilities need improvement.
    Top Answer:The design is highly beneficial. It functions as a sandbox environment.
    Top Answer:If we have P1 and P2 subscriptions, Microsoft will not charge us for creating applications on the Azure portal.
    Ranking
    Views
    472
    Comparisons
    402
    Reviews
    1
    Average Words per Review
    234
    Rating
    9.0
    Views
    5,970
    Comparisons
    2,803
    Reviews
    20
    Average Words per Review
    461
    Rating
    8.0
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    Jitterbit, Jitterbit Harmony
    Azure Logic Apps, MS Azure Logic Apps
    Learn More
    Overview

    Open source integration platform designed to handle the most complex integration challenges between legacy, enterprise and On-Demand applications. 

    Connect your business-critical apps and services with Azure Logic Apps, automating your workflows without writing a single line of code.

    Sample Customers
    LA Metro, Mophie, Club Auto, University of Miami, Exostar, Dialog Direct, Avero, Greenpoint Technologies, Berklee Online, Odyssey, KeyedIn Solutions, Swish Maintenance, SPP Pumps Limited, Talent Plus, Ricoh Canada, Televerde, Reed Construction Data, Sika US, Sunkist Growers
    nord lock, mission linen supply, esmart systems
    Top Industries
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company17%
    Healthcare Company9%
    Financial Services Firm9%
    Manufacturing Company7%
    REVIEWERS
    Computer Software Company40%
    Energy/Utilities Company13%
    Marketing Services Firm7%
    Healthcare Company7%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Educational Organization32%
    Computer Software Company12%
    Manufacturing Company6%
    Financial Services Firm5%
    Company Size
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business67%
    Midsize Enterprise25%
    Large Enterprise8%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business27%
    Midsize Enterprise16%
    Large Enterprise58%
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business48%
    Midsize Enterprise6%
    Large Enterprise45%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business14%
    Midsize Enterprise39%
    Large Enterprise47%
    Buyer's Guide
    Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS)
    April 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about MuleSoft, Microsoft, Oracle and others in Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS). Updated: April 2024.
    768,578 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    Jitterbit Harmony is ranked 13th in Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) with 13 reviews while Microsoft Azure Logic Apps is ranked 2nd in Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) with 28 reviews. Jitterbit Harmony is rated 8.6, while Microsoft Azure Logic Apps is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Jitterbit Harmony writes "An easy-to-setup solution with good stability ". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Microsoft Azure Logic Apps writes "Provides Integration Service Environment (ISE) for content-based routing, data transformation, and enrichment, enhancing integration capabilities". Jitterbit Harmony is most compared with MuleSoft Composer, Azure Data Factory, Mule Anypoint Platform, SnapLogic and TIBCO Scribe, whereas Microsoft Azure Logic Apps is most compared with Mule Anypoint Platform, Boomi AtomSphere Integration, Oracle Integration Cloud Service, SAP Cloud Platform and TIBCO Cloud Integration.

    See our list of best Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) vendors.

    We monitor all Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.