We performed a comparison between Jitterbit Harmony and webMethods.io Integration based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Amazon, MuleSoft, Matillion and others in Cloud Data Integration."The Cloud Console for monitoring and troubleshooting data operations."
"It is very easy to build integrations and processes to pull and push data."
"We only use small parts of the solution, however, the parts that we use are quite adequate."
"Jitterbit handles the most lines of data in a .csv and loads the quickest of any data loader I have tried."
"It is a scalable solution."
"It runs like an appliance and has tremendous throughput."
"Integrity, ease of use, user-friendly user interface, and errorless logs are the most valuable features."
"The fluid user interface (probably the most user friendly interface, when compared to its competitors)."
"Our use case is for integration factory for SAP. It is mostly for SAP integration."
"The solution is scalable."
"I like the tool's scalability."
"It's easy to construct new interfaces like apps and client portals."
"Oracle's self-service capabilities, of which we make extensive use, is the most valuable feature."
"The connectivity that the tool provides, along with the functionalities needed for our company's business, are some of the beneficial aspects of the product."
"There's hardware, software and application integration, providing hosting flexibility."
"I know with Salesforce updating the UI like they did, it slowed it down a lot."
"Looping through complex data structures can be difficult."
"Sometimes we experience disconnections and I have to close all Jitterbit programs."
"Sometimes additional connectors are needed."
"In the past few months, there have been some server downtimes during work hours that have affected some critical scheduled integrations."
"The initial setup can be a little bit difficult."
"You need to have some development skills or hire a Jitterbit engineer to make changes."
"There were some bugs in the product. For example if you run a delete query and test, it deletes the actual data."
"webMethods.io Integration's installation is complex. It should also improve integration and connectors."
"The solution's release management feature could be better."
"Rules engine processes and BPM processes should be improved."
"It is difficult to maintain."
"I am not satisfied with the solution because it takes too much effort to migrate and add new information. The migration could be easier."
"The product's stability is an area of concern where improvements are required."
"The products, at the moment, are new and there should perhaps be support for the older version of the protocols."
Jitterbit Harmony is ranked 19th in Cloud Data Integration with 13 reviews while webMethods.io Integration is ranked 22nd in Cloud Data Integration with 7 reviews. Jitterbit Harmony is rated 8.6, while webMethods.io Integration is rated 7.8. The top reviewer of Jitterbit Harmony writes "An easy-to-setup solution with good stability ". On the other hand, the top reviewer of webMethods.io Integration writes "Though the tool provides great connectivity functionality, it needs to be made more stable". Jitterbit Harmony is most compared with MuleSoft Composer, Azure Data Factory, Mule Anypoint Platform, Microsoft Azure Logic Apps and Boomi AtomSphere Integration, whereas webMethods.io Integration is most compared with webMethods Integration Server, SAP Cloud Platform, Apigee, Microsoft Azure API Management and Microsoft Azure Logic Apps.
See our list of best Cloud Data Integration vendors and best Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) vendors.
We monitor all Cloud Data Integration reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.