We performed a comparison between Jitterbit Harmony and SAP Data Services based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Informatica, Oracle and others in Data Integration."Integrity, ease of use, user-friendly user interface, and errorless logs are the most valuable features."
"The fluid user interface (probably the most user friendly interface, when compared to its competitors)."
"It runs like an appliance and has tremendous throughput."
"It is very easy to build integrations and processes to pull and push data."
"The Cloud Console for monitoring and troubleshooting data operations."
"It is a scalable solution."
"Jitterbit handles the most lines of data in a .csv and loads the quickest of any data loader I have tried."
"Easy integration with Salesforce"
"The solution offers very good integration capabilities."
"Data Services' table comparison mechanism is very powerful. It's pretty hard to find a similar feature in other solutions."
"Its integration capabilities and the data migration capabilities are the most valuable. It is very good for SAP and non-SAP tools. It has very good integration with SAP, but it also has the capabilities to connect to other systems. We find it very helpful and stable."
"The maintenance of data services is the solution's most valuable feature."
"Technical support from SAP is awesome. If we have an issue, they give a good solution."
"The user interface is ok."
"The most valuable feature is the ETL functionality."
"The solution is easy to use since it's a graphical tool. It also requires only low-level coding."
"There were some bugs in the product. For example if you run a delete query and test, it deletes the actual data."
"You need to have some development skills or hire a Jitterbit engineer to make changes."
"Looping through complex data structures can be difficult."
"The initial setup can be a little bit difficult."
"In the past few months, there have been some server downtimes during work hours that have affected some critical scheduled integrations."
"Sometimes additional connectors are needed."
"Its API management capabilities need improvement."
"I would like the ability to offer a dedicated cloud version for security."
"It's an ETL that is very good with relational databases but not as good with files and semi-structured files."
"The solution should offer more machine learning and automation."
"An area for improvement in SAP Data Services could involve making the product more accessible to non-technical end-users."
"The interface is not quite user-friendly and is in need of improvement."
"Newer feature integration is lagging behind the company acquisitions and the product could do more to service a broader range of devices."
"With SAP Data Services, the problem arises when I try to connect to Azure Databricks."
"Data Services SAP is lacking in sources and target databases compared to Informatica. SAP Data Services should have more connectivity."
"The solution shows a lack of cloud support data services."
Jitterbit Harmony is ranked 35th in Data Integration with 13 reviews while SAP Data Services is ranked 10th in Data Integration with 45 reviews. Jitterbit Harmony is rated 8.6, while SAP Data Services is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Jitterbit Harmony writes "An easy-to-setup solution with good stability ". On the other hand, the top reviewer of SAP Data Services writes "Responsive support, scalable, and beneficial integration". Jitterbit Harmony is most compared with MuleSoft Composer, Azure Data Factory, Microsoft Azure Logic Apps, Mule Anypoint Platform and SnapLogic, whereas SAP Data Services is most compared with Azure Data Factory, Syniti Data Quality, Informatica PowerCenter, SAP Process Orchestration and Palantir Foundry.
See our list of best Data Integration vendors and best Cloud Data Integration vendors.
We monitor all Data Integration reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.