Most Helpful Review
Find out what your peers are saying about Juniper SRX vs. Palo Alto Networks WildFire and other solutions. Updated: March 2018.
325,762 professionals have used our research since 2012.
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
The IPS (In-plane switching) is the most valuable feature.
Its ability to discover attacks is a valuable feature. All of the other features that have to do with security are good.
The greatest benefit for the organization is the confidence that we are secured.
This solution has good security, and it's a good product. You can trust Cisco, and there's support as well, which is really good.
Its VPN and ASN features are very stable.
The setup was straightforward. I was happy with the configuration and deployment of the solution, as it was quick.
It provides security for our company and users.
It protects our network.
From a protection perspective, it provides a network perimeter security function for our company.
We use it as a firewall at our head office and branches.
It integrates well with Fortinet and Palo Alto.
It uses many applications, like antivirus blocking and web filtering.
The high availability of the application is good.
It protects the data behind our switches.
It helps us perform our daily jobs.
We mostly use the Layer 4 firewall functions: Access rules, NAT, and site-to-site IPsec VPN.
It helps us when segmenting and securing the network and all sort of technologies, all sort of next generation needs. It's next generation phases of firewall like anti-virus, sandboxing, wifi, and VPN.
Being an application-based firewall, this is one of the critical focus factors along with the threat prevention services it provides.
It is stable and pretty much scalable.
The cloud-based services are a nice feature.
My primary use case for this solution is for a secure gateway.
The reporting feature helps our performance.
Their technical support is outstanding and top-notch.
It catches modified signatures of known viruses.
At times the product is sluggish and slow
Some of the features, like the stability, need to be improved.
There may have been one or two incidences of malicious threats.
The phishing emails could be improved.
In terms of next-generation capabilities, Cisco is a little behind, and it is way behind the market leaders.
The initial setup was complex.
The pricing is a bit high.
Migration with other appliances is not easy. It has to be done manually, and this takes a long time.
This solution needs to update for "Next Generation" needs.
It did not improve our safety because the IDS does not detect some attacks, but our anti-virus software did.
We tried configuring the IDS for more than four months, but it did not work properly.
The CLI is verbose. You have to say a lot to do a little. I don't like that part of it. Cisco's command syntax seems to be a good bit more concise. When you're trying to get something done, you don't want to have to type a bunch.
Juniper needs to focus more on their perimeter firewalls.
The GUI needs to be easier to handle.
I would like to see endpoint control and endpoint testing security.
I would like them to add a dashboard because it's difficult to operate.
Other vendors have some sort of bandwidth management built into the firewall itself and Palo Alto is missing that.
As a firewall and 360 degrees of security, there needs to be more maturity.
The initial setup was complex.
I think it would be nice for Palo Alto to work without the connection to the cloud. It is 100% powerful when connected to the cloud. But, if you disconnect from the cloud, you only get 40-50% power.
I would give this product a rating of 9 out of 10 due to some slight issues of performance.
They should make their user interface a little more user-friendly.
The VPN and decryption need improvement.
They provide a medium level of technical support.
Pricing and Cost Advice
Pricing is high, but it is essentially a corporate decision.
The cost is a bit high compared to other solutions in the market.
Cisco recently has become very expensive.
The cost is a bit higher than other competitive solutions on the market.
It is considered on the "high end" of the spectrum.
The cost of keeping the licensing up on the ASA is very expensive. It has a lot of positives, but the cost of going with it is really starting to be a major negative right now.
Commercial leasing is the best option.
ASA pricing seems high compared to other firewalls, such as the Sophos XG models.
It has a low price.
It is not that expensive.
Pricing is good. Most of the costs are in the UTM (IDS/IPS, virus scanning, etc) subscription.
Palo Alto was nice, but much more expensive.
We were able to lower our overall operating costs over a three year period by 25%, mostly recovered from maintenance/support costs.
Small enterprises or telco have variant licenses, and this licensing should be improved.
I would say about $20,000 for a SRX650 with IDP licence.
Pricing is very good, not expensive.
It's pretty expensive but with respect to value for money, it's okay.
It is a reasonable price compared to other solutions on the market.
The pricing is OK, it is not too expensive.
More expensive than other firewalls.
It is expensive, a feature more accessible to enterprise class customers, but provides an enhanced possibility that Zero- or near-Zero-day threats may be identified and mitigated. The cost of the product weighed against the potential impact of even one successful crypto malware-type exploit may justify the expense.
The pricing and licensing option should be categorized for various countries such as for Bangladesh.
It's not particularly cheap, but it is absolutely worth it.
It IS a bit expensive, but I think you get what you pay for. Value is there.
Compared 34% of the time.
Compared 10% of the time.
Compared 8% of the time.
Compared 29% of the time.
Compared 21% of the time.
Compared 9% of the time.
Compared 23% of the time.
Compared 11% of the time.
Compared 10% of the time.
Also Known As
|Cisco ASA, Adaptive Security Appliance, ASA||SRX|
|Cisco||Juniper||Palo Alto Networks|
Adaptive Security Appliance (ASA) is Cisco's end-to-end software solution and core operating system that powers the Cisco ASA product series. This software solution provides enterprise-level firewall capabilities for all types of ASA products, including blades, standalone appliances and virtual devices. Adaptive Security Appliance provides protection to organizations of all sizes, and allows end-users to access information securely anywhere, at any time, and through any device.
Adaptive Security Appliance is also fully compatible with other key security technologies, and so provides organizations with an all-encompassing security solution.
Block more threats and quickly mitigate those that do breach your defenses with the industry’s first threat-focused NGFW.
|High-performance security with advanced, integrated threat intelligence, delivered on the industry's most scalable and resilient platform. SRX Series gateways set new benchmarks with 100GbE interfaces and feature Express Path technology, which enables up to 1 Tbps performance for the data center.||WildFire™ cloud-based threat analysis service is the industry’s most advanced analysis and prevention engine for highly evasive zero-day exploits and malware. The cloud-based service employs a unique multi-technique approach combining dynamic and static analysis, innovative machine learning techniques, and a groundbreaking bare metal analysis environment to detect and prevent even the most evasive threats.|
Learn more about Cisco ASA NGFW
Learn more about Juniper SRX
Learn more about Palo Alto Networks WildFire
|There are more than one million Adaptive Security Appliances deployed globally. Top customers include First American Financial Corp., Genzyme, Frankfurt Airport, Hansgrohe SE, Rio Olympics, The French Laundry, Rackspace, and City of Tomorrow.||7-Eleven, AARNet Pty Ltd, Allegro Networks, alltours GmbH, Apollo Hotel Papendrecht, Armstrong Atlantic State University, Atlantech Online, Availity, Bajaj Capital, Baloise Insurance, BancABC, BAS Group, Black Lotus, Blue Box, Borealis, Carilion Clinic, Catholic Health System, CATV, Champlain College, Chinas Ministry of Railways, China University of Mining and Technology (CUMT), Cloud Dynamics, CloudSeeds, Cloudwatt, CODONiS, Colt Technology Services, Cork Internet Exchange, CSS Versicherung AG, CyrusOne, Danish Crown, Deloitte Belgium, Department of Energy, Divona Telecom, DQE Communications, DreamHost, European Government Agency, Expedient, Financial Market Information Services Provider, Fluidata, Fonality, Fox Sports, Global Financial Institution, Global Investment Bank, Global Investment Company, Energy Sciences Network (ESnet), Goethe University, HEAnet, High Performance Networks Inc., Hillenbrand||Novamedia, Nexon Asia Pacific, Lenovo, Samsonite, IOOF, Sinogrid, SanDisk Corporation|
Financial Services Firm16%
Comms Service Provider12%
Comms Service Provider22%
Financial Services Firm15%
Comms Service Provider50%
Financial Services Firm17%
Comms Service Provider40%
Venture Capital & Private Equity Firm7%
Comms Service Provider15%
Financial Services Firm14%