Juniper SRX vs pfSense

Juniper SRX is ranked 8th in Firewalls with 8 reviews vs pfSense which is ranked 4th in Firewalls with 19 reviews. The top reviewer of Juniper SRX writes "Consolidation combines routing, switching, and firewall services in one device". The top reviewer of pfSense writes "Users can work offsite through the VPN. ". Juniper SRX is most compared with Fortinet FortiGate, Cisco ASA and Palo Alto Networks WildFire. pfSense is most compared with Sophos UTM, Fortinet FortiGate and Cisco ASA. See our Juniper SRX vs pfSense report.
Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
+Add products to compare
Most Helpful Review
Juniper srx vs. pfsense report from it central station 2018 05 04 thumbnail
Find out what your peers are saying about Juniper SRX vs pfSense and others in Firewalls.
270,047 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Quotes From Members Comparing Juniper SRX vs pfSense

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
Security policies in combination with zones: It is very easy to organize the security polices in a logical structure.CLI: Junos CLI is very easy to use, and it is also very easy to find back items in the configuration and to change them.Commit: You can update the whole configuration without affecting the production. The new configuration will be loaded once the command "Commit" is submitted. You can also do a Commit confirmed to automatically roll back to the previous config after X minutes.​It's a reliable firewall and very stable, for both the hardware and applications it is stable.It'sa very secure device, it has good attack prevention capabilities using UTM.The rollback option and Commit Confirmed are great features. They give us the security to change configurations without downtime.

Read more »

Creation of certificates and the facility to administer services are valuable features.It is a good firewall with good performance.Centralized administration with multiple services, which allows for execution in several important functionalities of information security.The gain in performance and security from configuring the VPN connections was significant.It is a stable solution.Improved service performance and availability through redundancy.An incomparable stability is achieved with other firewall systems.Firewall system for small, medium, and large data networks. It allows you to provide security to your environment: DMZ networks, LAN, WAN, etc.

Read more »

Cons
The visibility/reporting could be better. To see something, you have to export the log to a syslog and then process with another product.It would be good if Junos had "unique commands" between all hierarchical levels, discarding the use of the "Run" command.

Read more »

It requires more attention to provide a better alternative for open source to small government or educational institutions with reduced budgets in terms of technology.Needs services on additional features, such as managing inventory and generating reports.My only observation is about the quality of the IPSec logs, which are difficult to interpret and are poor in filters.​Improve analysis of logs and dashboards (control panel) with improved alert functionality.It should integrate with LDAP, Active Directory, etc, to improve the way in which the traces and connections of each IP, or user connected through the firewall, are shown.Reporting and real-time monitoring, since I'm used to Watchguard's reporting features, it would be nice to have an embedded solution for reporting.The GUI. There are TONS of plugins for pfSense, as such, if a user wants to add quite a bit of functionality, the GUI will feel a little congested.Network monitoring and device inventory could use some improvements. I'm using SpiceWorks for this because it never really worked in pfSense.

Read more »

Pricing and Cost Advice
I would say about $20,000 for a SRX650 with IDP licence.Pricing is very good, not expensive.

Read more »

It works quite well for an open source product.If you need to buy hardware onto which to install PfSense, go with their boxes on their website, they are great.It's open source (and free - as in beer and speech), but also has commercial support.Spend at least $300 or more on a good pfSense box. Use a hard drive, and not a USB flash drive for pfSense storage.Unless they have specific requirements that demand a particular device, I always suggest pfSense specifically because of the absence of pricing and licensing.PFSENSE turns out to be very economical, the license is free and for little money you get very good support

Read more »

Juniper srx vs. pfsense report from it central station 2018 05 04 thumbnail
Find out what your peers are saying about Juniper SRX vs pfSense and others in Firewalls.
270,047 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Ranking
RANKING
Views
24,118
Comparisons
19,689
Reviews
8
Followers
617
Avg. Rating
8.3
Views
60,552
Comparisons
44,733
Reviews
19
Followers
3,635
Avg. Rating
8.6
Top Comparisons
Top Comparisons
Fortinet
Compared 32% of the time.
Cisco
Compared 23% of the time.
See more Juniper SRX competitors »
Sophos logo
Compared 32% of the time.
Fortinet
Compared 17% of the time.
Cisco
Compared 9% of the time.
See more pfSense competitors »
Also Known As
Also Known AsSRX
Website/Video
Website/VideoJuniper
  • Vendor 7502 screenshot 1524942680
pfSense
  • Vendor 22828 screenshot 1524950803
OverviewQuestionmark icon
OverviewHigh-performance security with advanced, integrated threat intelligence, delivered on the industry's most scalable and resilient platform. SRX Series gateways set new benchmarks with 100GbE interfaces and feature Express Path technology, which enables up to 1 Tbps performance for the data center.Providing comprehensive network security solutions for the enterprise, large business and SOHO, pfSense solutions bring together the most advanced technology available to make protecting your network easier than ever before. Our products are built on the most reliable platforms and are engineered to provide the highest levels of performance, stability and confidence.
OFFER
Learn more about Juniper SRX
Learn more about pfSense
Sample Customers
Sample Customers7-Eleven, AARNet Pty Ltd, Allegro Networks, alltours GmbH, Apollo Hotel Papendrecht, Armstrong Atlantic State University, Atlantech Online, Availity, Bajaj Capital, Baloise Insurance, BancABC, BAS Group, Black Lotus, Blue Box, Borealis, Carilion Clinic, Catholic Health System, CATV, Champlain College, Chinas Ministry of Railways, China University of Mining and Technology (CUMT), Cloud Dynamics, CloudSeeds, Cloudwatt, CODONiS, Colt Technology Services, Cork Internet Exchange, CSS Versicherung AG, CyrusOne, Danish Crown, Deloitte Belgium, Department of Energy, Divona Telecom, DQE Communications, DreamHost, European Government Agency, Expedient, Financial Market Information Services Provider, Fluidata, Fonality, Fox Sports, Global Financial Institution, Global Investment Bank, Global Investment Company, Energy Sciences Network (ESnet), Goethe University, HEAnet, High Performance Networks Inc., HillenbrandNerds On Site Inc., RKC Development Inc., Expertech, Fisher's Technology, Ncisive, Consulting, CPURX, Vaughn's Computer House Calls, Imeretech LLC, Digital Crisis, Carolina Digital Phone, Technigogo Technology Services, The Simple Solution, SwiftecITInc, Rocky Mountain Tech Team, Free Range Geeks, Alaska Computer Geeks, Lark Information Technology, Renaissance Systems Inc., Cutting Edge Computers, Caretech LLC, GoVanguard, Network Touch Ltd, P.C. Solutions.Net, Vision Voice and Data Systems LLC, Montgomery Technologies, Techforce, Concero Networks, ASONInc, CPS Electronics and Consulting, Darkwire.net LLC, IT Specialists, MBS-Net Inc., VOICE1 LLC, Advantage Networking Inc., Powerhouse Systems, Doxa Multimedia Inc., Pro Computer Service, Virtual IT Services, A&J Computers Inc., Envision IT LLC, CommunicaONE Inc., Bone Computer Inc., Amax Engineering Corporation, QPG Ltd. Co., IT 101 Inc., Perfect Cloud Solutions, Applied Technology Group Inc., The Digital Sun Group LLC, Firespring
Top IndustriesQuestionmark icon
Top Industries
REVIEWERS
Comms Service Provider
57%
Financial Services Firm
29%
University
14%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Comms Service Provider
23%
Marketing Services Firm
14%
Manufacturing Company
13%
Financial Services Firm
7%
REVIEWERS
University
17%
Comms Service Provider
17%
Energy/Utilities Company
11%
Construction Company
11%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Comms Service Provider
16%
Manufacturing Company
9%
Financial Services Firm
7%
Non Tech Company
6%
Company SizeQuestionmark icon
Company Size
REVIEWERS
Small Business
36%
Midsize Enterprise
29%
Large Enterprise
36%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Small Business
32%
Midsize Enterprise
49%
Large Enterprise
19%
REVIEWERS
Small Business
67%
Midsize Enterprise
21%
Large Enterprise
13%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Small Business
38%
Midsize Enterprise
38%
Large Enterprise
24%
Juniper srx vs. pfsense report from it central station 2018 05 04 thumbnail
Find out what your peers are saying about Juniper SRX vs pfSense and others in Firewalls.
Download now
270,047 professionals have used our research since 2012.
We monitor all Firewalls reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.

Sign Up with Email