Compare Juniper SRX vs. SonicWall NSA
Juniper SRX is ranked 7th in Firewalls with 24 reviews while SonicWall NSA which is ranked 20th in Firewalls with 9 reviews. Juniper SRX is rated 7.6, while SonicWall NSA is rated 7.2. The top reviewer of Juniper SRX writes "Enables us to integrate a firewall and router in a single product but IPS needs improvement". On the other hand, the top reviewer of SonicWall NSA writes "Difficult to manage and a large number of sessions slows it down". Juniper SRX is most compared with Fortinet FortiGate, Cisco ASA NGFW and Palo Alto Networks WildFire, whereas SonicWall NSA is most compared with Fortinet FortiGate, Meraki MX Firewalls and SonicWall TZ. See our Juniper SRX vs. SonicWall NSA report.
Sponsored | ||
Most Helpful Review | ||||||||
|
|
| ||||||
 Find out what your peers are saying about Juniper SRX vs. SonicWall NSA and other solutions. Updated: July 2019. 360,582 professionals have used our research since 2012. | ||||||||
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros | ||
The most valuable features are the flexibility and level of security that this solution provides. Integration with all the other Cisco tools is valuable. We moved from a legacy firewall to the ASA with FirePOWER, increasing our Internet Edge defense dramatically. Cisco ASA NGFW significantly improves our bank. It protects any high-value products that we use from hackers, viruses, malware, and script-bots. It gives us metrics on network traffic as well as what kind of attacks we are getting from the outside. Right now, Cisco ASA NGFW has given us a lot of improvement. We are planning to move to a new facility and will be a much larger organization. The feature that I found most valuable is the overall stability of the product. The stability of Cisco ASA is excellent compared to other products on the market. Because of our customer experience as an integrator company, our clients never report any performance problems. We have a good performance reputation with Cisco ASA. I would say the Firepower module is most valuable. I'm trying more to transition to this kind firewall. I had to study a little on Palo Alto Networks equipment. There is a lot I have to learn about the difference. | I like the routing and firewall features. The solution's stability is very good. I've found the security features, such as IDS and the VPN most valuable. The deployment is quite easy and fast. It helped us with its routing capabilities which eased the cost, because otherwise I would have had to take a router and firewall, and then integrate it. With this, however, it was an integration of firewall and routing services all together in a single product. That was one thing that I loved about it. The most valuable feature is the virtualization because it can be used for customers who are using the mobile data network to request a private connection to a remote site. There is a lot of flexibility in how you can commit, check, and back out of a configuration. On a scale from one to ten, one being the worst and ten being the best I'd give Juniper SRX an overall rating of eight because of its' competitive price. | With the deployment of the SonicWall NSA solution, we never suffered a problem due to invasion or contamination of any kind. I really like the performance; there are no delays and no latency, which is a unique quality in firewalls nowadays. Our old firewall was running as HA (High Availability) on two different but identical rack mounted servers. Moving to SonicWall allowed the company to move to one unit, yet accommodate more connections because it had sixteen ports and handled fail-over better than the old firewall solution. Content Filtering and sandboxing are valuable features. Anti-Spam reduces unwanted mail on corporate exchange services. Content filtering reduces the load on the available bandwidth and restricts employees from using distracting websites on the job, which leads to more productive hours. It has good reporting, the reporting is marvelous. Support is usually good when it comes to helping with issues. |
Cons | ||
There was an error in the configuration, related to our uplink switches, that caused us to contact technical support, and it took a very long time to resolve the issue. With regards to stability, we had a critical bug come out during our evaluation... not good. The product would be improved if the GUI could be brought into the 21st Century. Cisco should improve its user interface design. There is a deep learning curve to the product if you are a newcomer. There is no support here in Georgia. If something goes wrong, support is not always very helpful with the other firewalls or other products. One of my main concerns, an area that could use improvement is in adjusting the need to buy a license to enable features. Usually, the customers are satisfied, but I am going to recommend that all clients upgrade to FirePOWER management. I want Cisco to improve the feature called anti-spam. We use a Cisco only email solution, that's why we need the anti-spam on email facility. The installation and integration of Cisco ASA with FirePOWER can be improved. The management with Fortigate is easier than Cisco ASA on FirePOWER. The management side of Cisco ASA can be improved so it can be more easily configured and used. | The workplace management console needs improvement. It should be a little bit more developed. Also, the interface needs a bit more improvement. The big thing is performance. With all the features turned on it slows down. In terms of other features, I'd like to see a web filter, 10 point control, application control and a DNA filter in the next release. The GUI needs improvement. IPS is one that I would definitely want to be improved. I would also like SSL VPN to be integrated. The Juniper product has to improve in terms of innovation. It's a good stable firewall, but it's nowhere near what it needs to be for a next-generation type firewall. Improvements can be made to the GUI. The GUI can be improved by creating policies to handle IPS requirements. The configuration should be a one-step process. This would make it easier to complete the setup to register the time of operation. | This product is unable to secure access to endpoints for our external employees. The cloud services may be in need of some improvement. I feel that the SSL VPN client software needs a lot of improvement. The only thing that we would want would be single-pane management, which it has, but the GMS is not very good. It's purely the management of multiple devices for multiple customers, that's the only thing that it's lacking. After-sales support and hands-on training facilities are not available in my country. The problem primarily with SonicWall is it's a Unix box. And it's all software, all the activities, blocking, censoring, everything has to happen in the software. If you start hitting the box with a lot of sessions it slows down and that's not what I expect from a firewall. It's very hard to manage this box. You really need a lot of skills to operate the SonicWall. There is training and the like, but it's just hard to manage. Even if you have the knowledge, there are too many options. The menus are not very clear, where you should find the information. Port forwarding could use streamlining. |
Pricing and Cost Advice | ||
Watch out for hidden licensing and incredibly high annual maintenance costs. We paid about $7,000 for the Cisco firewall, plus another small Cisco router and the lead switch. It was under the combined license. It's a final agreement. The cost is a big factor for us. This is why we are using it only in our restricted area. They are very much higher than their competitors in the market. Licensing is expensive compared to other solutions. Pricing is high, but it is essentially a corporate decision. The cost is a bit high compared to other solutions in the market. Cisco recently has become very expensive. The cost is a bit higher than other competitive solutions on the market. | The price of this solution is more than other products, but it's stable, and the technical support is better than I have seen with others. There was no additional licensing cost because there were no IPS services. It was just a firewall IP circuit router so they have the default licensing. We just need to renew the support yearly. While the price of support is expensive, the price of the solution, itself, is not. The pricing is perhaps half, probably forty percent, of Cisco. The direct support with Juniper is expensive. When you stop using the solution and miss one year of payments, if you want the support back on a specific node, they ask you to pay for the year that you haven't used the node. In terms of pricing, Juniper is in the middle. The most expensive firewall is Palo Alto. If a customer wants the cheapest price they should go for FortiGate. Juniper is in between these products. It has a low price. It is not that expensive. | In our evaluation, we found that the costs of deploying the solution, and also purchasing the hardware and licenses, were very attractive. Considering the market, I believe that the price of this solution is great. Additional resources are too expensive. Licensed features provide application control, content filtering, antivirus, and anti-malware all in a single appliance. The CPUs are not able to compete with a similar price point to the Fortinet, WatchGuard, or Palo Alto product. A firewall doing anti-spam might be a low cost solution, but it is not your best strategy. You need their analyzer to properly generate reports. This is an expensive, licensed feature, with a complex application or appliance back-end. |
 Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Firewalls solutions are best for your needs. 360,582 professionals have used our research since 2012. | ||
Top Comparisons | ||
 Compared 37% of the time.  Compared 11% of the time. Compared 9% of the time. | Compared 32% of the time. Compared 18% of the time.  Compared 11% of the time. | Compared 30% of the time. Compared 14% of the time.  Compared 14% of the time. |
Also Known As | ||
| Cisco ASA, Adaptive Security Appliance, ASA | SRX | NSA 250M, NSA 2600, NSA 3600, NSA 4600, NSA 5600, Dell SonicWALL NSA |
Learn | ||
| Cisco | Juniper | SonicWall |
Overview  | ||
Adaptive Security Appliance (ASA) is Cisco's end-to-end software solution and core operating system that powers the Cisco ASA product series. This software solution provides enterprise-level firewall capabilities for all types of ASA products, including blades, standalone appliances and virtual devices. Adaptive Security Appliance provides protection to organizations of all sizes, and allows end-users to access information securely anywhere, at any time, and through any device. Adaptive Security Appliance is also fully compatible with other key security technologies, and so provides organizations with an all-encompassing security solution. Block more threats and quickly mitigate those that do breach your defenses with the industry’s first threat-focused NGFW. | High-performance security with advanced, integrated threat intelligence, delivered on the industry's most scalable and resilient platform. SRX Series gateways set new benchmarks with 100GbE interfaces and feature Express Path technology, which enables up to 1 Tbps performance for the data center. | Achieve a deeper level of security with the SonicWALL Network Security Appliance (NSA) Series of next-generation firewalls. NSA Series appliances integrate automated and dynamic security capabilities into a single platform, combining the patented, SonicWALL Reassembly Free Deep Packet Inspection (RFDPI) firewall engine with a powerful, massively scalable, multi-core architecture. Now you can block even the most sophisticated threats with an intrusion prevention system (IPS) featuring advanced anti-evasion capabilities, SSL decryption and inspection, and network-based malware protection that leverages the power of the cloud. |
Offer | ||
Learn more about Cisco ASA NGFW | Learn more about Juniper SRX | Learn more about SonicWall NSA |
Sample Customers | ||
| There are more than one million Adaptive Security Appliances deployed globally. Top customers include First American Financial Corp., Genzyme, Frankfurt Airport, Hansgrohe SE, Rio Olympics, The French Laundry, Rackspace, and City of Tomorrow. | 7-Eleven, AARNet Pty Ltd, Allegro Networks, alltours GmbH, Apollo Hotel Papendrecht, Armstrong Atlantic State University, Atlantech Online, Availity, Bajaj Capital, Baloise Insurance, BancABC, BAS Group, Black Lotus, Blue Box, Borealis, Carilion Clinic, Catholic Health System, CATV, Champlain College, Chinas Ministry of Railways, China University of Mining and Technology (CUMT), Cloud Dynamics, CloudSeeds, Cloudwatt, CODONiS, Colt Technology Services, Cork Internet Exchange, CSS Versicherung AG, CyrusOne, Danish Crown, Deloitte Belgium, Department of Energy, Divona Telecom, DQE Communications, DreamHost, European Government Agency, Expedient, Financial Market Information Services Provider, Fluidata, Fonality, Fox Sports, Global Financial Institution, Global Investment Bank, Global Investment Company, Energy Sciences Network (ESnet), Goethe University, HEAnet, High Performance Networks Inc., Hillenbrand | Orange County Rescue Mission, First Source, Michaels & Taylor, Green Clinic Health System, Aspire Chiltern Skills and Enterprise Centre, UnitedStack, Faith Lutheran College Redlands, Celtic Manor Resort, Star Kay White, Air Works, Unimat Life, NHS Yorkshire and Humber Commissioning Support (YHCS), Hutt City Council, Mato Grosso do Sul, Nspyre |
Top Industries | ||
Financial Services Firm19% Manufacturing Company12% Comms Service Provider12% University7% Comms Service Provider14% 13% Software R&D Company12% Manufacturing Company9% | Comms Service Provider53% Financial Services Firm18% Energy/Utilities Company12% Media Company6% Comms Service Provider40% Media Company13% Software R&D Company10% Venture Capital & Private Equity Firm5% | Writing And Editing Position19% Software R&D Company9% Transportation Company9% Comms Service Provider8% |
Company Size | ||
Small Business38% Midsize Enterprise25% Large Enterprise37% Small Business42% Midsize Enterprise25% Large Enterprise33% | Small Business42% Midsize Enterprise18% Large Enterprise39% | Small Business60% Midsize Enterprise25% Large Enterprise15% |
Find out what your peers are saying about Juniper SRX vs. SonicWall NSA and other solutions. Updated: July 2019.
360,582 professionals have used our research since 2012.
See also Juniper SRX Reviews, SonicWall NSA Reviews, and our list of Best Firewalls Companies.
We monitor all Firewalls reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post
reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference
with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
Sign in to see all reviews and comparisons. It's free!
By clicking Sign in with LinkedIn™ you agree to let IT Central Station use your LinkedIn profile
and email address in accordance with our Privacy Policy and agree to the Terms of Service.
- Unlimited access to 28000+ reviews from real users
- Your own page to promote your professional skills
- Networking events and peer-to-peer consultations
Already a member? Sign in.
By registering, you agree to our Terms of Service and Privacy Policy.
- Unlimited access to 28000+ reviews from real users
- Your own page to promote your professional skills
- Networking events and peer-to-peer consultations
Already a member? Sign In.