Juniper SRX vs Sophos Cyberoam UTM

Juniper SRX is ranked 10th in Firewalls with 8 reviews vs Sophos Cyberoam UTM which is ranked 6th in Firewalls with 15 reviews. The top reviewer of Juniper SRX writes "We have been able to solve a lot of connectivity issues with these firewalls that the bigger name devices didn’t handle so well". The top reviewer of Sophos Cyberoam UTM writes "I like the remote VOIP routing through the VPN". Juniper SRX is most compared with Fortinet FortiGate, Cisco ASA and Palo Alto Networks WildFire. Sophos Cyberoam UTM is most compared with Fortinet FortiGate, Cisco ASA and SonicWall TZ. See our Juniper SRX vs Sophos Cyberoam UTM report.
Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
+Add products to compare
Most Helpful Review
Juniper srx vs. sophos cyberoam utm report from it central station 2018 01 04 thumbnail
Find out what your peers are saying about Juniper SRX vs. Sophos Cyberoam UTM and others in Firewalls
254,138 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Quotes From Members Comparing Juniper SRX vs Sophos Cyberoam UTM

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
​It's a reliable firewall and very stable, for both the hardware and applications it is stable.It'sa very secure device, it has good attack prevention capabilities using UTM.The rollback option and Commit Confirmed are great features. They give us the security to change configurations without downtime.

Read more »

Bandwidth Management and aggregation. It is valuable for combining two ISPs. Switching to a secondary/redundant ISP is thus seamless, in the event that the primary ISP goes down. The Bandwidth Management is also valuable for limiting heavy downloaders that may impact negatively on the experience of other users.The product has helped control bandwidth utilization, as well as enhanced connectivity and security to remote locations.User and network policies to be managed on a single screen with powerful filtering and search options.Good user interface.Web Filtering and Application Filtering saves a lot of my bandwidth and improves the user's productivity.Web application filtering eases internet access control.Content filtering, as this enables me to control that which employees can view at different time quotas.For a small-medium enterprise this solution is easy to manage and operate.

Read more »

Cons
It would be good if Junos had "unique commands" between all hierarchical levels, discarding the use of the "Run" command.

Read more »

Needs a mail alert/notification when the device loses any of its connections, during ISP redundancy implementation.The following could be improved: Web Filtering using wildcards; clarity regarding the firewall rules; granular reporting features.On-box sandstorm should be available. As of now, it is from their cloud.We use different workarounds and find different solutions for it, depending on the client's needs. We shouldn't have to, we should just be able to use the product as it comes with Cyberoam, rather than having to revert to other products.The Traffic Discovery feature should allow administrators to disconnect unnecessary live connections.VPN configuration is not very swift.Maybe network traffic analysis for malware and malicious behavior.Smaller CR15 units don’t have a hard disc or built in IView software. These units could do with that feature.

Read more »

Pricing and Cost Advice
Pricing is very good, not expensive.

Read more »

It’s value for the money. It’s functionally competitive with higher priced alternative brands.The price is very competitive and the licensing is easy.It is more expensive than cheap routers, but it offers a lot of functionality, and that warrants the price.Licensing is a bit costly, mostly for features requiring subscription.It is very reasonably priced as compared to other solutions in the market.Licensing is very good value for the money.

Read more »

Juniper srx vs. sophos cyberoam utm report from it central station 2018 01 04 thumbnail
Find out what your peers are saying about Juniper SRX vs. Sophos Cyberoam UTM and others in Firewalls
254,138 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Ranking
RANKING
Views
24,267
Comparisons
20,021
Reviews
8
Followers
572
Avg. Rating
8.3
Views
29,965
Comparisons
23,763
Reviews
15
Followers
2,763
Avg. Rating
8.1
Top Comparisons
Top Comparisons
Fortinet
Compared 24% of the time.
Cisco
Compared 16% of the time.
See more Juniper SRX competitors »
Cisco
Compared 10% of the time.
Sonicwall logo
Compared 10% of the time.
See more Sophos Cyberoam UTM competitors »
Also Known As
Also Known AsSRX
Website/Video
Website/VideoJuniper
  • Vendor 7502 screenshot 1519500356
Sophos
  • Vendor 8030 screenshot 1519505475
OverviewQuestionmark icon
OverviewHigh-performance security with advanced, integrated threat intelligence, delivered on the industry's most scalable and resilient platform. SRX Series gateways set new benchmarks with 100GbE interfaces and feature Express Path technology, which enables up to 1 Tbps performance for the data center.Cyberoam Unified Threat Management hardware appliances offer comprehensive security to organizations, ranging from large enterprises to small and branch offices. Multiple security features integrated over a single, Layer 8 Identity-based platform make security simple, yet highly effective.
Sample Customers
Sample Customers7-Eleven, AARNet Pty Ltd, Allegro Networks, alltours GmbH, Apollo Hotel Papendrecht, Armstrong Atlantic State University, Atlantech Online, Availity, Bajaj Capital, Baloise Insurance, BancABC, BAS Group, Black Lotus, Blue Box, Borealis, Carilion Clinic, Catholic Health System, CATV, Champlain College, Chinas Ministry of Railways, China University of Mining and Technology (CUMT), Cloud Dynamics, CloudSeeds, Cloudwatt, CODONiS, Colt Technology Services, Cork Internet Exchange, CSS Versicherung AG, CyrusOne, Danish Crown, Deloitte Belgium, Department of Energy, Divona Telecom, DQE Communications, DreamHost, European Government Agency, Expedient, Financial Market Information Services Provider, Fluidata, Fonality, Fox Sports, Global Financial Institution, Global Investment Bank, Global Investment Company, Energy Sciences Network (ESnet), Goethe University, HEAnet, High Performance Networks Inc., HillenbrandGulf Corporation for Technology, Maridive & Oil Services, Fidelity Bank, Petra University, Capital FM Kenya, Safari Park Hotel and Casino, Mayfair Casino, Pacific International Lines, Mozambique Ministry of Education, University of Namibia, Royal Hospital for Neuro-disability, University of Hawai, New Delhi Municipal Council
Top IndustriesQuestionmark icon
Top Industries
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Comms Service Provider
23%
Marketing Services Firm
14%
Manufacturing Company
12%
Financial Services Firm
7%
REVIEWERS
Engineering Company
10%
Non Tech Company
10%
Mining And Metals Company
10%
Manufacturing Company
10%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Financial Services Firm
10%
Comms Service Provider
9%
Non Tech Company
8%
Transportation Company
7%
Company SizeQuestionmark icon
Company Size
REVIEWERS
Small Business
31%
Midsize Enterprise
23%
Large Enterprise
46%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Small Business
32%
Midsize Enterprise
49%
Large Enterprise
18%
REVIEWERS
Small Business
48%
Midsize Enterprise
30%
Large Enterprise
22%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Small Business
34%
Midsize Enterprise
37%
Large Enterprise
29%
Juniper srx vs. sophos cyberoam utm report from it central station 2018 01 04 thumbnail
Find out what your peers are saying about Juniper SRX vs. Sophos Cyberoam UTM and others in Firewalls
Download now
254,138 professionals have used our research since 2012.
We monitor all Firewalls reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.

Sign Up with Email