Compare Juniper SRX vs. Sophos XG

Juniper SRX is ranked 11th in Firewalls with 19 reviews while Sophos XG is ranked 5th in Firewalls with 20 reviews. Juniper SRX is rated 7.6, while Sophos XG is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of Juniper SRX writes "This best in class Next-Gen firewall is elegant in its ease-of-use and architecture". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Sophos XG writes "Offers a high level of visibility of what's happening on your network or on your client machines". Juniper SRX is most compared with Fortinet FortiGate, Palo Alto Networks WildFire, pfSense, Meraki MX and SonicWall NSA, whereas Sophos XG is most compared with Fortinet FortiGate, Sophos UTM, pfSense, Meraki MX and Palo Alto Networks NG Firewalls. See our Juniper SRX vs. Sophos XG report.
Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Cisco ASA NGFW Logo
68,080 views|51,092 comparisons
Juniper SRX Logo
23,390 views|18,774 comparisons
Sophos XG Logo
42,893 views|36,586 comparisons
Most Helpful Review
Shashidhara B N
Find out what your peers are saying about Juniper SRX vs. Sophos XG and other solutions. Updated: July 2020.
431,175 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros
Unfortunately in Cisco, only the hardware was good.The traffic inspection and the Firepower engine are the most valuable features. It gives you full details, application details, traffic monitoring, and the threats. It gives you all the containers the user is using, especially at the application level. The solution also provides application visibility and control.If we look at the Cisco ASA without Firepower, then one of the most valuable features is the URL filtering.It's easy to integrate ASA with other Cisco security products. When you understand the technology, it's not a big deal. It's very simple.The benefits we see from the ASA are connected to teleworking as well as, of course, having the basic functionality of a firewall in place and the prevention of attacks.On the network side, where you create your rules for allowing traffic — what can come inside and what can go out — that works perfectly, if you know what you want to achieve. It protects you.If you have a solution that is creating a script and you need to deploy many implementations, you can create a script in the device and it will be the same for all. After that, you just have to do the fine tuning.They provide DDoS protection and multi-factor authentication. That is a good option as it enables work-from-home functionality.

More Cisco ASA NGFW Pros »

Juniper is one of the most powerful network security solutions while remaining simple to use, set up, and scale.The most valuable feature is the licensing scheme for security functions.Performance is a strong point.The EEE security controls allow us to make policy restrictions, so I can customize port numbers to allow or limit control.It helped us with its routing capabilities which eased the cost, because otherwise I would have had to take a router and firewall, and then integrate it. With this, however, it was an integration of firewall and routing services all together in a single product. That was one thing that I loved about it.I like the routing and firewall features.The solution's stability is very good.I've found the security features, such as IDS and the VPN most valuable.

More Juniper SRX Pros »

Great interface and in-built help is very intuitive.The most valuable feature is the intrusion prevention system.it's user-friendly, not complex.The simplicity and timely updates.The most valuable feature is that it scans all of the data for any kind of malware.The cloud-based interface makes it easy to manage.This solution is very user-friendly and even a non-professional can configure the policies.The simplicity of the setup is the most valuable feature.

More Sophos XG Pros »

Cons
In NGFW, Cisco should be aligned with the new technology and inspection intelligence because Cisco is far behind in this pipeline.Security generally requires integration with many devices, and the management side of that process could be enhanced somewhat. It would help if there was a clear view of the integrations and what the easiest way to do them is.One area where the ASA could be improved is that it doesn't have AMP. When you get an ASA with the Firepower model, ASA with FTD, then you have advanced malware protection.If I want to activate IPS features on it, I have to buy another license. If I want Cisco AnyConnect, I have to buy another license. That's where we have challenges.Cisco missed the mark with all the configuration steps. They are a pain and, when doing them, it looks as if we're using a very old technology — yet the technology itself is not old, it's very good. But the front-end configuration is very tough.Cisco provides us with application visibility and control, although it's not a complete solution compared to other vendors. Cisco needs to work on the application behavior side of things, in particular when it comes to the behavior of SSL traffic.It is expensive.We were also not too thrilled when Cisco announced that in the upcoming new-gen ASA, iOS was not going to be supported, or if you install them, they will not be able to be managed through the Sourcefire. However, it seems like Cisco is moving away from the ASA iOS to the Sourcefire FireSIGHT firmware for the ASA. We haven't had a chance to test it out.

More Cisco ASA NGFW Cons »

It could have features that other products support like blade options and stand-alone endpoint security.In the next release, I would like to see the remote access client improved as well as improvements made to the administration GUI.There are a lot of features that customers do not know about and I think that better documentation would help when it comes to learning how to use the product.It should be easier to escalate support tickets.IPS is one that I would definitely want to be improved. I would also like SSL VPN to be integrated.The workplace management console needs improvement. It should be a little bit more developed. Also, the interface needs a bit more improvement.The big thing is performance. With all the features turned on it slows down.In terms of other features, I'd like to see a web filter, 10 point control, application control and a DNA filter in the next release.

More Juniper SRX Cons »

Lacking network access control, user profiling and analytics dashboards.The two main areas where this product needs improvement are routing and reporting.The uploading and downloading of reports should be included.The interface could be simplified and diagnostic system graphs improved.It would be helpful if they had a set of standard templates because it would assist in the beginning, when you are just getting started.The weakest point is the technical support because they are difficult to get into contact with.The cloud support needs to be improved.Their technical support needs improvement. I've been on hold with them for hours waiting for their support.

More Sophos XG Cons »

Pricing and Cost Advice
Always consider what you might need to reduce your wasted time and invest it in other solutions.There is room for improvement in the pricing when compared to the market. Although, when you compare the benefits of support from Cisco, you can adjust the value and it becomes comparable, because you usually need very good support. So you gain value there with this device.When it comes to Cisco, the price of everything is higher. Cisco firewalls are expensive, but we get support from Cisco, and that support is very active.It's a brilliant firewall, and the fact that it comes with a perpetual license really does go far in terms of helping the organization in not having to deal with those costs on an annual basis. That is a pain point when it comes to services like the ones we have on Fortigate. That's where we really give Cisco firewalls the thumbs up.Cisco is expensive, but you do get benefits for the price.In terms of costs, other solutions are more expensive than Cisco. Palo Alto is more expensive than Cisco.Pricing varies on the model and the features we are using. It could be anywhere from $600 to $1000 to up to $7,000 per year, depending on what model and what feature sets are available to us.We used Check Point and the two are comparable. Cost was really what put us onto the ASAs... the price tag for Check Point was exorbitantly more than what it is for the ASA solution.

More Cisco ASA NGFW Pricing and Cost Advice »

Compared to other vendors, the pricing of this solution is good.There was no additional licensing cost because there were no IPS services. It was just a firewall IP circuit router so they have the default licensing. We just need to renew the support yearly.The price of this solution is more than other products, but it's stable, and the technical support is better than I have seen with others.While the price of support is expensive, the price of the solution, itself, is not.The pricing is perhaps half, probably forty percent, of Cisco.The direct support with Juniper is expensive. When you stop using the solution and miss one year of payments, if you want the support back on a specific node, they ask you to pay for the year that you haven't used the node.In terms of pricing, Juniper is in the middle. The most expensive firewall is Palo Alto. If a customer wants the cheapest price they should go for FortiGate. Juniper is in between these products.

More Juniper SRX Pricing and Cost Advice »

The price is cheaper than that of some competing vendors.We paid for our licensing for three years, upfront, and there are no costs in addition to the standard fees.The Sophos pricing, in general, is better than SonicWall, Fortinet, WatchGuard, or anybody else.We are paying about $1,500 yearly for the Enterprise Plus. As far as I know, there aren't costs above this standard fee.It's a suitable price and license.For licensing the XG 210, we paid approximately $3000 for three years. There are no additional fees on top of this.

More Sophos XG Pricing and Cost Advice »

report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Firewalls solutions are best for your needs.
431,175 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Popular Comparisons
Compared 36% of the time.
Compared 9% of the time.
Compared 6% of the time.
Compared 3% of the time.
Compared 34% of the time.
Compared 7% of the time.
Compared 4% of the time.
Compared 3% of the time.
Compared 19% of the time.
Compared 13% of the time.
Compared 12% of the time.
Compared 6% of the time.
Also Known As
Cisco ASA, Adaptive Security Appliance, ASA, Cisco Sourcefire FirewallsSRX
Learn
Cisco
Juniper
Sophos
Overview

Adaptive Security Appliance (ASA) is Cisco's end-to-end software solution and core operating system that powers the Cisco ASA product series. This software solution provides enterprise-level firewall capabilities for all types of ASA products, including blades, standalone appliances and virtual devices. Adaptive Security Appliance provides protection to organizations of all sizes, and allows end-users to access information securely anywhere, at any time, and through any device.

Adaptive Security Appliance is also fully compatible with other key security technologies, and so provides organizations with an all-encompassing security solution.

Block more threats and quickly mitigate those that do breach your defenses with the industry’s first threat-focused NGFW.

High-performance security with advanced, integrated threat intelligence, delivered on the industry's most scalable and resilient platform. SRX Series gateways set new benchmarks with 100GbE interfaces and feature Express Path technology, which enables up to 1 Tbps performance for the data center.

Sophos XG Firewall is next gen firewall that is optimized for today’s business, delivering all the protection and insights you need in a single, powerful appliance that’s easy to manage.

Offer
Learn more about Cisco ASA NGFW
Learn more about Juniper SRX
Learn more about Sophos XG
Sample Customers
There are more than one million Adaptive Security Appliances deployed globally. Top customers include First American Financial Corp., Genzyme, Frankfurt Airport, Hansgrohe SE, Rio Olympics, The French Laundry, Rackspace, and City of Tomorrow.7-Eleven, AARNet Pty Ltd, Allegro Networks, alltours GmbH, Apollo Hotel Papendrecht, Armstrong Atlantic State University, Atlantech Online, Availity, Bajaj Capital, Baloise Insurance, BancABC, BAS Group, Black Lotus, Blue Box, Borealis, Carilion Clinic, Catholic Health System, CATV, Champlain College, Chinas Ministry of Railways, China University of Mining and Technology (CUMT), Cloud Dynamics, CloudSeeds, Cloudwatt, CODONiS, Colt Technology Services, Cork Internet Exchange, CSS Versicherung AG, CyrusOne, Danish Crown, Deloitte Belgium, Department of Energy, Divona Telecom, DQE Communications, DreamHost, European Government Agency, Expedient, Financial Market Information Services Provider, Fluidata, Fonality, Fox Sports, Global Financial Institution, Global Investment Bank, Global Investment Company, Energy Sciences Network (ESnet), Goethe University, HEAnet, High Performance Networks Inc., Hillenbrand
Information Not Available
Top Industries
REVIEWERS
Financial Services Firm20%
Manufacturing Company10%
Comms Service Provider9%
University8%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company28%
Comms Service Provider21%
Media Company7%
Government5%
REVIEWERS
Comms Service Provider56%
Financial Services Firm17%
Energy/Utilities Company11%
Media Company6%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company32%
Comms Service Provider31%
Media Company8%
K 12 Educational Company Or School4%
REVIEWERS
Financial Services Firm18%
Healthcare Company12%
Mining And Metals Company12%
Construction Company6%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company24%
Comms Service Provider21%
Media Company9%
Construction Company5%
Company Size
REVIEWERS
Small Business35%
Midsize Enterprise25%
Large Enterprise40%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Small Business32%
Midsize Enterprise21%
Large Enterprise46%
REVIEWERS
Small Business42%
Midsize Enterprise16%
Large Enterprise42%
REVIEWERS
Small Business67%
Midsize Enterprise23%
Large Enterprise10%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Small Business52%
Midsize Enterprise24%
Large Enterprise24%
Find out what your peers are saying about Juniper SRX vs. Sophos XG and other solutions. Updated: July 2020.
431,175 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our list of best Firewalls vendors.

We monitor all Firewalls reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.