Juniper SRX vs. WatchGuard XTM

Juniper SRX is ranked 8th in Firewalls with 15 reviews vs WatchGuard XTM which is ranked 7th in Firewalls with 12 reviews. The top reviewer of Juniper SRX writes "The throughput is fine but the CLI is verbose, especially when configuring". The top reviewer of WatchGuard XTM writes "Helps me create firewall policies for networks and services". Juniper SRX is most compared with Fortinet FortiGate, Cisco ASA and Palo Alto Networks WildFire. WatchGuard XTM is most compared with Fortinet FortiGate, Sophos UTM and pfSense. See our Juniper SRX vs. WatchGuard XTM report.
Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Most Helpful Review
Use Null Product? Share your opinion.
Find out what your peers are saying about Juniper SRX vs. WatchGuard XTM and others in Firewalls.
300,846 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Quotes From Members Comparing Juniper SRX vs. WatchGuard XTM

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
We use it as a firewall at our head office and branches.It integrates well with Fortinet and Palo Alto.It uses many applications, like antivirus blocking and web filtering.The high availability of the application is good.It protects the data behind our switches.It helps us perform our daily jobs.We mostly use the Layer 4 firewall functions: Access rules, NAT, and site-to-site IPsec VPN.Juniper has the "recovery safety feature", so if you perform a "commit confirmed" and the new configuration disconnects you. then there is no "confirmed" command with X mins (default = 10 mins). It automatically reverts (recovers) to the previous configuration. This is handy for when you do not want to make that trip down range just to reboot a router.

Read more »

We have used technical support for WatchGuard many times and overall, we are satisfied with it. They are always listening and there is a good reaction time to our findings. When there are issues, they really try to resolve them.I could still keep the data rates really high, up near the two gigahertz data speeds, without compromise on the security perimeters being acted simultaneously.Application Control is fantastic with over 2,500 applications and the granularity that we can either allow people to view but not be able to log on to Facebook; or view it and log onto it if they're in the marketing department, but not play Facebook games. There are all sorts of different options like that. So it's highly granular.Reputation Enabled Defense indicates that some websites are so infested that it's not even worth visiting them, and therefore saving the bandwidth of going through the detection process.They have a reporting system which can store data over a very long period of time. Not many other firewall vendors provide a reporting system, but if they do, like Fortinet does, then you've got buy that as an additional product and that can be more than twice as expensive as the initial investment in the firewall. And without reporting over a long-term period, you're just about wasting your time.It is stable and does not require you to reboot all the time.​It configures in all-in-one place.​​Monitoring of network activity is included in the box.​

Read more »

Read more »

Cons
It did not improve our safety because the IDS does not detect some attacks, but our anti-virus software did.We tried configuring the IDS for more than four months, but it did not work properly.The CLI is verbose. You have to say a lot to do a little. I don't like that part of it. Cisco's command syntax seems to be a good bit more concise. When you're trying to get something done, you don't want to have to type a bunch.Juniper needs to focus more on their perimeter firewalls.The GUI needs to be easier to handle.I would like to see endpoint control and endpoint testing security.I would like them to add a dashboard because it's difficult to operate.The product only has basic features.

Read more »

Sometimes we have had issues with stability of the product.Setup of this solution is complex, it's not plug and play.WatchGuard doesn't have a product that allows them to get into the data center. And that's just because there is no hardware to do the job. The software could do it, but there's no hardware that allows that to happen at the moment. So it doesn't scale as well as some other products, that's for sure.The initial setup is neither simple nor complex. If you know the base in networking and how the firewall works, you will be able to figure it out.​Cloud-based central administration of all devices from one point would be niceSyslog (Dimension) is focused on presentation, but needs more focus on utility like SonicWall syslog (GMS/Analyzer).The VPN errors are not helpful when troubleshooting.

Read more »

Read more »

Pricing and Cost Advice
It has a low price.It is not that expensive.Pricing is good. Most of the costs are in the UTM (IDS/IPS, virus scanning, etc) subscription.Palo Alto was nice, but much more expensive.We were able to lower our overall operating costs over a three year period by 25%, mostly recovered from maintenance/support costs.Small enterprises or telco have variant licenses, and this licensing should be improved.I would say about $20,000 for a SRX650 with IDP licence.Pricing is very good, not expensive.

Read more »

Like all other manufacturers, there are a lot of features and different pricing. The best is to talk to a representative.​Very competitive pricing regarding throughput compared to other alternatives.It costs less than the SO works and others (like SonicWall, Cisco, and Barracuda) without increasing so much CPU use.Get at least a maintenance contract for the updates and take a larger WatchGuard than you need. A WatchGuard creates new ways to secure your network.

Read more »

Information Not Available
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Firewalls solutions are best for your needs.
300,846 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Ranking
Views
30,451
Comparisons
19,705
Reviews
15
Followers
681
Avg. Rating
7.5
Views
36,420
Comparisons
22,890
Reviews
11
Followers
669
Avg. Rating
7.8
Views
0
Comparisons
0
Reviews
1
Followers
1
Avg. Rating
5.0
Top Comparisons
Compared 31% of the time.
Compared 23% of the time.
See more Juniper SRX competitors »
Compared 28% of the time.
Compared 14% of the time.
Compared 11% of the time.
See more WatchGuard XTM competitors »
Also Known As
SRX
Website/Video
Juniper
WatchGuard
Null Vendor
Overview
High-performance security with advanced, integrated threat intelligence, delivered on the industry's most scalable and resilient platform. SRX Series gateways set new benchmarks with 100GbE interfaces and feature Express Path technology, which enables up to 1 Tbps performance for the data center.Small businesses need big security, too, and the WatchGuard XTM Series firewall/VPN appliances deliver that strong protection Ð but without the hefty price tag. Enterprise-grade security includes full HTTPS content inspection, VoIP support, and optional security subscriptions like Application Control and Intrusion Prevention Service.
Information Not Available
OFFER
Learn more about Juniper SRX
Learn more about WatchGuard XTM
Learn more about Null Product
Sample Customers
7-Eleven, AARNet Pty Ltd, Allegro Networks, alltours GmbH, Apollo Hotel Papendrecht, Armstrong Atlantic State University, Atlantech Online, Availity, Bajaj Capital, Baloise Insurance, BancABC, BAS Group, Black Lotus, Blue Box, Borealis, Carilion Clinic, Catholic Health System, CATV, Champlain College, Chinas Ministry of Railways, China University of Mining and Technology (CUMT), Cloud Dynamics, CloudSeeds, Cloudwatt, CODONiS, Colt Technology Services, Cork Internet Exchange, CSS Versicherung AG, CyrusOne, Danish Crown, Deloitte Belgium, Department of Energy, Divona Telecom, DQE Communications, DreamHost, European Government Agency, Expedient, Financial Market Information Services Provider, Fluidata, Fonality, Fox Sports, Global Financial Institution, Global Investment Bank, Global Investment Company, Energy Sciences Network (ESnet), Goethe University, HEAnet, High Performance Networks Inc., HillenbrandAVG, Cyren, Kaspersky Lab, Lastline, NCP engineering, Trend Micro, Websense
Information Not Available
Top Industries
REVIEWERS
Comms Service Provider
38%
Financial Services Firm
25%
Energy/Utilities Company
13%
University
13%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Comms Service Provider
25%
Marketing Services Firm
13%
Manufacturing Company
12%
Financial Services Firm
8%
REVIEWERS
Financial Services Firm
36%
Healthcare Company
14%
Logistics Company
14%
Import And Exporter
7%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Comms Service Provider
13%
Financial Services Firm
7%
Manufacturing Company
7%
Transportation Company
7%
No Data Available
Company Size
REVIEWERS
Small Business
37%
Midsize Enterprise
21%
Large Enterprise
42%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Small Business
32%
Midsize Enterprise
49%
Large Enterprise
20%
REVIEWERS
Small Business
73%
Midsize Enterprise
21%
Large Enterprise
6%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Small Business
46%
Midsize Enterprise
30%
Large Enterprise
25%
No Data Available
Find out what your peers are saying about Juniper SRX vs. WatchGuard XTM and others in Firewalls.
Download now
300,846 professionals have used our research since 2012.
We monitor all Firewalls reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.

Sign Up with Email