Juniper SRX vs. Zscaler Web Security

Juniper SRX is ranked 8th in Firewalls with 15 reviews vs Zscaler Web Security which is ranked 15th in Firewalls with 1 review. The top reviewer of Juniper SRX writes "The throughput is fine but the CLI is verbose, especially when configuring". The top reviewer of Zscaler Web Security writes "There is a single panel where you can configure the policies for your entire organisation worldwide". Juniper SRX is most compared with Fortinet FortiGate, Cisco ASA and Palo Alto Networks WildFire. Zscaler Web Security is most compared with Cisco Umbrella, Palo Alto Networks WildFire and Forcepoint Web Security.
Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
+Add products to compare
Most Helpful Review
Find out what your peers are saying about Fortinet, Cisco, Sophos and others in Firewalls.
295,762 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Quotes From Members Comparing Juniper SRX vs. Zscaler Web Security

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
We use it as a firewall at our head office and branches.It integrates well with Fortinet and Palo Alto.It uses many applications, like antivirus blocking and web filtering.The high availability of the application is good.It protects the data behind our switches.It helps us perform our daily jobs.We mostly use the Layer 4 firewall functions: Access rules, NAT, and site-to-site IPsec VPN.Juniper has the "recovery safety feature", so if you perform a "commit confirmed" and the new configuration disconnects you. then there is no "confirmed" command with X mins (default = 10 mins). It automatically reverts (recovers) to the previous configuration. This is handy for when you do not want to make that trip down range just to reboot a router.

Read more »

Zscaler excels in security protection and the cloud is always up-to-date. It does not matter if you are a small or big organisation, you will receive the same security quality.One on the main benefits is protection all time from anywhere.In terms of management and visibility, there is a single panel where you can configure the policies for your entire organisation worldwide.​After a proper implementation, the maintenance is very low.​

Read more »

Cons
It did not improve our safety because the IDS does not detect some attacks, but our anti-virus software did.We tried configuring the IDS for more than four months, but it did not work properly.The CLI is verbose. You have to say a lot to do a little. I don't like that part of it. Cisco's command syntax seems to be a good bit more concise. When you're trying to get something done, you don't want to have to type a bunch.Juniper needs to focus more on their perimeter firewalls.The GUI needs to be easier to handle.I would like to see endpoint control and endpoint testing security.I would like them to add a dashboard because it's difficult to operate.The product only has basic features.

Read more »

​When you have appliances, SSL inspection is always a headache due to poor performance and/or lack of ciphers implemented. ​Do not expect to pay for the service and start using it, like Gmail. Zscaler requires a proper implementation to be done to make it successful.

Read more »

Pricing and Cost Advice
It has a low price.It is not that expensive.Pricing is good. Most of the costs are in the UTM (IDS/IPS, virus scanning, etc) subscription.Palo Alto was nice, but much more expensive.We were able to lower our overall operating costs over a three year period by 25%, mostly recovered from maintenance/support costs.Small enterprises or telco have variant licenses, and this licensing should be improved.I would say about $20,000 for a SRX650 with IDP licence.Pricing is very good, not expensive.

Read more »

​Be aware that you will need to invest some time and money to adapt your environment for Zscaler (traffic redirection, software deployment, authentication, etc).​

Read more »

report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Firewalls solutions are best for your needs.
295,762 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Ranking
RANKING
Views
29,331
Comparisons
19,721
Reviews
14
Followers
637
Avg. Rating
7.8
Views
21,415
Comparisons
13,567
Reviews
1
Followers
392
Avg. Rating
10.0
Top Comparisons
Top Comparisons
Compared 31% of the time.
Compared 23% of the time.
See more Juniper SRX competitors »
See more Zscaler Web Security competitors »
Also Known As
Also Known AsSRX
Website/Video
Website/VideoJuniper
Zscaler
Overview
OverviewHigh-performance security with advanced, integrated threat intelligence, delivered on the industry's most scalable and resilient platform. SRX Series gateways set new benchmarks with 100GbE interfaces and feature Express Path technology, which enables up to 1 Tbps performance for the data center.Zscaler Web Security provides unmatched security, visibility and control, going beyond the basics of web content filtering. Delivered in the cloud, Zscaler includes award-winning web security integrated with our robust network security platform that features advanced threat protection, real-time analytics and forensics. You'll get protection across every user, location and device, including laptops, smartphones, tablets and Internet of Things devices.
OFFER
Learn more about Juniper SRX
Learn more about Zscaler Web Security
Sample Customers
Sample Customers7-Eleven, AARNet Pty Ltd, Allegro Networks, alltours GmbH, Apollo Hotel Papendrecht, Armstrong Atlantic State University, Atlantech Online, Availity, Bajaj Capital, Baloise Insurance, BancABC, BAS Group, Black Lotus, Blue Box, Borealis, Carilion Clinic, Catholic Health System, CATV, Champlain College, Chinas Ministry of Railways, China University of Mining and Technology (CUMT), Cloud Dynamics, CloudSeeds, Cloudwatt, CODONiS, Colt Technology Services, Cork Internet Exchange, CSS Versicherung AG, CyrusOne, Danish Crown, Deloitte Belgium, Department of Energy, Divona Telecom, DQE Communications, DreamHost, European Government Agency, Expedient, Financial Market Information Services Provider, Fluidata, Fonality, Fox Sports, Global Financial Institution, Global Investment Bank, Global Investment Company, Energy Sciences Network (ESnet), Goethe University, HEAnet, High Performance Networks Inc., HillenbrandUlster-Greene ARC, BanRegio, HDFC, Ralcorp Holdings Inc., British American Tobacco, Med America Billing Services Inc., Lanco Group, Aquafil, Telefonica, Swisscom, Brigade Group
Top Industries
Top Industries
REVIEWERS
Comms Service Provider
38%
Financial Services Firm
25%
Energy/Utilities Company
13%
University
13%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Comms Service Provider
25%
Marketing Services Firm
13%
Manufacturing Company
12%
Financial Services Firm
8%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Financial Services Firm
22%
Comms Service Provider
18%
Healthcare Company
8%
Manufacturing Company
7%
Company Size
Company Size
REVIEWERS
Small Business
37%
Midsize Enterprise
21%
Large Enterprise
42%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Small Business
32%
Midsize Enterprise
49%
Large Enterprise
20%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Small Business
20%
Midsize Enterprise
14%
Large Enterprise
66%
Find out what your peers are saying about Fortinet, Cisco, Sophos and others in Firewalls.
Download now
295,762 professionals have used our research since 2012.
We monitor all Firewalls reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.

Sign Up with Email