We performed a comparison between Juniper vSRX and Sangfor NGAF based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Firewalls solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The secure web gateway module and the application control module are valuable. HA operations are very easy."
"There is an easy process for configuring it, and it is straightforward to implement the device from scratch."
"The most valuable features are that it is very simple to configure and to manage."
"The most valuable features are the possibility of having one fabric for switching on security."
"Fortinet FortiGate's most valuable features are ease of use, flexibility, and most of the configuration we can be done using the GUI. When we compare Fortinet FortiGate with other solutions the firewall policy are very easy to understand."
"Fortinet FortiGate appears to be scalable."
"UTM/NGFW features and FortiCloud for logs and backups are awesome."
"All of the features of Fortinet FortiGate are useful and the security protection is good."
"The architecture of the OS in Juniper is very good. It's flexibility, scalability, and the technicality is also good."
"It's basic functionality is probably the most valuable feature."
"The initial setup is pretty simple."
"The product’s quality and performance are better than other vendors."
"The initial setup was very straightforward. There was no problem. The initial deployment took about one hour."
"The pricing is reasonable."
"The most valuable features are application filtering, content filtering, the intrusion prevention system (IPS), and definitely the application firewall."
"The product's scalability is good, and my company has 150 users."
"The price versus value is good because the solution is less expensive than Sophos, Fortinet, or SonicWall."
"You might try Sangfor if you are on a tight budget. The price is affordable, and Sangfor offers a lot of features. We don't have any complaints about Sangfor."
"It enables us to not only detect but also prevent various types of incoming threats, allowing us to take appropriate corrective actions and exercise control over the network."
"It is a stable solution."
"So far, the performance and reliability of the product have supported our company's critical network traffic."
"The absolute best part of Sangfor NGAF is their support. It's a 24/7 support channel, and the last time I requested their assistance I got a reply within three minutes. They helped solve the problem immediately."
"In our hospital, Sangfor NGAF works well for us in terms of ensuring confidentiality and availability, which are crucial in the healthcare industry."
"Sangfor NGAF works accordingly with our customers. The solution has good performance, easy to use, and integrates well with the endpoints."
"Scalability for Fortinet FortiGate needs to be improved. SD-WAN security for this solution also needs some improvement."
"There could be more integration between the logging and analytical platforms to make it more seamless and integrated."
"The command line is complicated, and the interface could be better."
"The support system could be improved."
"The initial setup and configuration are not intuitive and require training."
"Some configuration elements cannot be easily altered once created."
"I would like to see a more intuitive dashboard."
"The pricing could always be better."
"The GUI interface needs improvement."
"The reporting can be improved."
"There are too many types of licenses, which can be confusing."
"The solution's GUI needs improvement."
"The solution could improve its technical support."
"We have some weird errors and some weird behavior on the solution occasionally. The device gets buggy without anyone touching it. It would work and then suddenly stop. Sometimes you need to just move the cards out and restart it again, and it will work. The solution itself, the hardware and the software, there must be some bugs that need to be dealt with."
"We worked with Cisco's support and Juniper's support and there are some differences, to be honest, Cisco is more available and is more competent at addressing our cases."
"The solution can be improved by allowing automatic updates for the OS devices."
"An area of improvement for Sangfor NGAF could be in the field of reporting and logging."
"The firewall system needs gradual improvements because there are more threats and challenges every day."
"The setup phase is quite complex."
"Lacks consistency in terms of filtering certain websites and applications."
"Sangfor NGAF could improve by refining its application control policies, especially in addressing challenges with certain types of applications."
"The reporting and log management could be improved."
"The solution has too many bugs and these slow down the implementation."
"Occasional issues with breaches which are dealt with expediently."
Juniper vSRX is ranked 26th in Firewalls with 30 reviews while Sangfor NGAF is ranked 21st in Firewalls with 31 reviews. Juniper vSRX is rated 7.8, while Sangfor NGAF is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Juniper vSRX writes "Fast with good usability and fairly scalable". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Sangfor NGAF writes "Affordable, easy to configure firewall with fast, responsive support". Juniper vSRX is most compared with Juniper SRX Series Firewall, Azure Firewall, Meraki MX, Cisco Secure Firewall and Zscaler Cloud Firewall, whereas Sangfor NGAF is most compared with Sophos XG, Palo Alto Networks NG Firewalls, Netgate pfSense, Check Point NGFW and Fortinet FortiOS. See our Juniper vSRX vs. Sangfor NGAF report.
See our list of best Firewalls vendors.
We monitor all Firewalls reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
