We performed a comparison between Juniper vSRX and Sophos Virtualization Security based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Trend Micro, Sophos, Juniper and others in Virtualization Security."The tool's most valuable features are routing features and service quality."
"The product’s quality and performance are better than other vendors."
"The technical support services are excellent."
"It's a very powerful solution and the firewalls offer high performance"
"The command feature is valuable."
"It is easy for me to go in and update settings, make changes, or add/remove rules or security."
"The most valuable features are application filtering, content filtering, the intrusion prevention system (IPS), and definitely the application firewall."
"The solution has good features."
"Using this solution allows us to set up rule-based access control."
"I like Sophos Virtualization Security's built-in antivirus and malware protection. The firewalls are pretty stable. It's just a matter of updating the virus signatures, and they're pretty good about providing those updates regularly."
"The most valuable features of the solution are VM security, VLP, and threat protection."
"The SVM deployment has very good performance."
"When it comes to their firewall, it notified me about a possible infection."
"The GUI really needs a lot of work, and it has got worse with successive version updates."
"The solution could improve its technical support."
"The solution's GUI needs improvement."
"Right now, we are going through issues and problems where the product gets dropped with the connection or during the authentication initial phase. While it could be our problem, we would like to see more stability in this area."
"VPN access is an area that needs improvement."
"I've talked to people that say Juniper now, as a device, can be a solution for a data center, but in the past, I have not seen this as being possible."
"We worked with Cisco's support and Juniper's support and there are some differences, to be honest, Cisco is more available and is more competent at addressing our cases."
"They really need to improve the GUI."
"Sophos Virtualization Security requires more usage. For example, if you have a virtual service line of 100 nodes, you are unable to deploy them from the console to a particular environment."
"I would like to see some new features for improving the security part of the solution."
"We are unable to reliably specify bandwidth limits for particular clients, which is something that needs to be improved."
"The solution would be improved if all of the advanced features were included in the SVM."
"I wish Sophos could offer the solution at a lower price, but I doubt they will."
More Sophos Virtualization Security Pricing and Cost Advice →
Juniper vSRX is ranked 3rd in Virtualization Security with 30 reviews while Sophos Virtualization Security is ranked 2nd in Virtualization Security with 5 reviews. Juniper vSRX is rated 7.8, while Sophos Virtualization Security is rated 7.6. The top reviewer of Juniper vSRX writes "Fast with good usability and fairly scalable". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Sophos Virtualization Security writes "Stable security and VPN solutions". Juniper vSRX is most compared with Juniper SRX Series Firewall, Azure Firewall, Meraki MX, Cisco Secure Firewall and Zscaler Cloud Firewall, whereas Sophos Virtualization Security is most compared with Trend Micro Deep Security.
See our list of best Virtualization Security vendors.
We monitor all Virtualization Security reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
