Junos Space Network Director vs OpenText Network Operations Management comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Junos Space Network Director and OpenText Network Operations Management based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Cisco, Fortinet, Broadcom and others in Network Management Applications.
To learn more, read our detailed Network Management Applications Report (Updated: March 2024).
765,386 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"It allows me to do more of the basic firewall features, like traffic management and others, in a single pane of glass.""The most valuable feature is the management from a single pane of glass.""The most valuable feature is the technical support, as it is better than others.""A centralized platform is crucial for efficiently managing all of our switches, which were previously handled individually, leading to significant challenges."

More Junos Space Network Director Pros →

"We can detect non-compliant devices and automate remediation actions to cover the gap in the configuration standards.""When it comes to customization, Micro Focus is more mature than its competitors."

More OpenText Network Operations Management Pros →

Cons
"Its interface should be improved and enhanced to offer various functions, with flexible pricing""The upgrades are very time-consuming and difficult, and they often have to rebuild the product.""I would like to see Space created to fully functional, where it's got multiple modules, particularly SD-WAN working on Corporate, or maybe become part of the Orchestrator portion.""I would like to them include network real-time performance and come up with a dashboard report."

More Junos Space Network Director Cons →

"It may need a more customizable UI.""Micro Focus Network Management doesn't support end-to-end monitoring of cloud infrastructure. Micro Focus might have different cloud solutions for cloud automation and hybrid cloud management. There are a lot of products that also support automation. That is different, but it should monitor the cloud from an IT operations management perspective."

More OpenText Network Operations Management Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "We would like the price to be reduced."
  • "This product is set at a good price point."
  • "Typically, Juniper is more expensive than Cisco in initial costs, but overall, the long-term licensing fees that you're going to pay for Juniper versus Cisco is going to be less."
  • More Junos Space Network Director Pricing and Cost Advice →

  • "Micro Focus' price is on the higher side, but there are other products like CA products and IBM that are more expensive. At the same time, you have to compare the maturity level of the solutions."
  • More OpenText Network Operations Management Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Network Management Applications solutions are best for your needs.
    765,386 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Top Answer:A centralized platform is crucial for efficiently managing all of our switches, which were previously handled individually, leading to significant challenges.
    Top Answer:Its interface should be improved and enhanced to offer various functions, with flexible pricing. It should provide the ability to modify interfaces, enabling actions like shutting them down, adding or… more »
    Top Answer:It served as my main point of contact for banking and the central tool for managing a large network of switches across multiple locations. The network consisted of about 3,300 switches, with roughly… more »
    Top Answer:We can detect non-compliant devices and automate remediation actions to cover the gap in the configuration standards.
    Top Answer:For small/medium networks, I'd recommend SolarWinds, Manage Engine, or PRTG. For vendor-based situations, Cisco Prime is best. With large-scale and multi-vendor scalability and security in mind, Micro… more »
    Top Answer:The NOM Platform already covers multiple vendors, and a lot of device types. This range of vendors and devices is increasing every quarter It may need a more customizable UI, which has already started… more »
    Ranking
    Views
    955
    Comparisons
    682
    Reviews
    1
    Average Words per Review
    559
    Rating
    8.0
    Views
    158
    Comparisons
    42
    Reviews
    1
    Average Words per Review
    839
    Rating
    10.0
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    Micro Focus Network Operations Management
    Learn More
    Overview

    Juniper Junos Space Network Director can support IT staff can manage their physical and virtual enterprise networks through a single pane of glass. Junos Space Network Director is a automated turnkey network management solution. Administrators can use it to visualize, analyze, and control their entire enterprise networks. In the data center, your IT staff can use the tool to manage and synchronize physical and virtual environments. In the campus, Network Director automates routine management tasks such as network provisioning and troubleshooting, dramatically improving operational efficiency and reliability. Network Director also integrates with VMware vCenter and vRealize Operations (vROps). The management tool offers sophisticated analytics for high-performance data centers, while open RESTful APIs support service orchestration integration with third-party platforms.

    Network management solutions are continually called onto to adapt to new technologies, while retaining value of existing ones, including: SDNs, multiple connection methods to the cloud and Internet, remote sites, and WiFi networks. All of these technologies require closer collaboration between network engineering and operations because of their dynamic nature, which requires fast and deep understanding of the technologies to operate effectively.

    Sample Customers
    St. Catherine's University, OneNet, University of New Haven, Frederick County Public Schools (Maryland), America's Test Kitchen
    Information Not Available
    Top Industries
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Government18%
    Computer Software Company17%
    Educational Organization6%
    University6%
    No Data Available
    Company Size
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business22%
    Midsize Enterprise15%
    Large Enterprise63%
    No Data Available
    Buyer's Guide
    Network Management Applications
    March 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about Cisco, Fortinet, Broadcom and others in Network Management Applications. Updated: March 2024.
    765,386 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    Junos Space Network Director is ranked 11th in Network Management Applications with 4 reviews while OpenText Network Operations Management is ranked 12th in Network Management Applications with 2 reviews. Junos Space Network Director is rated 7.6, while OpenText Network Operations Management is rated 9.0. The top reviewer of Junos Space Network Director writes "High scalability network management with centralized control and an intuitive interface that provides efficient monitoring and configuration capabilities". On the other hand, the top reviewer of OpenText Network Operations Management writes "Good integration capabilities, good reliability, and is user-friendly". Junos Space Network Director is most compared with Cisco DNA Center, Juniper Mist Wired Assurance, Fortinet FortiManager, Anuta ATOM and SolarWinds Network Configuration Manager, whereas OpenText Network Operations Management is most compared with .

    See our list of best Network Management Applications vendors.

    We monitor all Network Management Applications reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.