We performed a comparison between Nintex Process Platform and OpenText MBPM based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Camunda, Pega, Apache and others in Business Process Management (BPM)."NWC forms could be better. Also, the ability to build workflows that are not dependent on SharePoint is very desirable. The forms feature just isn’t as functional as the forms for SharePoint."
"Our solutions using Nintex has been most successful in automating HR processes because it allows you to easily and rapidly build solutions that conform to the unique business processes for each entity."
"It has integration with BI and Analytics tools, and RPA toolsets as well."
"We were able to meet all of the requirements for functionality that were specified, and we did not experience challenges where we had to compromise on functionality."
"I think the initial setup is fine."
"Allows us to provide desktop/laptop and mobile solutions to our users."
"It's easy to configure your set of rules to make the form controls work perfectly, removing manual work and making processes seamless."
"The solution offers very good integration capabilities. We've never had issues integrating it without solutions."
"Not just the solution's automation capabilities, but we like everything about it since we are more of a system integrator."
"User interface could use some improvement. Perhaps integration with Visual Studio or SharePoint Designer would be useful."
"The solution needs more RPA and AI features."
"We would like to design parallel workflows and long-running workflows, along with new features for connecting to cloud-based systems."
"K2's support for DevOp team corporations is weak."
"The security features for this solution need to be improved."
"The interface could be better and more language support is needed in the development environment or in the solutions platform in general."
"Bring all features available from the on-premise product into the cloud version and the workflow error reporting."
"The Workflow Designer needs improvement."
"The user interface could be better in OpenText MBPM."
"There are shortcomings in the solution's support and documentation part."
Nintex Process Platform is ranked 9th in Business Process Management (BPM) with 21 reviews while OpenText MBPM is ranked 41st in Business Process Management (BPM) with 2 reviews. Nintex Process Platform is rated 8.0, while OpenText MBPM is rated 7.0. The top reviewer of Nintex Process Platform writes "Offers good integration capabilities and easy to learn and good stability". On the other hand, the top reviewer of OpenText MBPM writes " A solution offering good automation capabilities while needing to improve its support and documentation". Nintex Process Platform is most compared with Camunda, IBM BPM, Appian, Pega BPM and SAP Signavio Process Manager, whereas OpenText MBPM is most compared with Camunda, Appian and Pega BPM.
See our list of best Business Process Management (BPM) vendors.
We monitor all Business Process Management (BPM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.