Compare K2 blackpearl vs. Nintex Workflow

K2 blackpearl is ranked 16th in Business Process Management with 3 reviews while Nintex Workflow is ranked 10th in Business Process Management with 10 reviews. K2 blackpearl is rated 7.6, while Nintex Workflow is rated 7.6. The top reviewer of K2 blackpearl writes "Has useful tools, it's very easy to use events". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Nintex Workflow writes "Streamlines automating SharePoint processes such as building sites, updating content". K2 blackpearl is most compared with Nintex Workflow, Camunda BPM and Pega BPM, whereas Nintex Workflow is most compared with K2 blackpearl, Camunda BPM and AgilePoint. See our K2 blackpearl vs. Nintex Workflow report.
Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
K2 blackpearl Logo
3,923 views|2,526 comparisons
Nintex Workflow Logo
2,742 views|2,007 comparisons
Most Helpful Review
Find out what your peers are saying about K2 blackpearl vs. Nintex Workflow and other solutions. Updated: September 2019.
366,593 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros
It is very easy to use events. K2 has useful tools.I think that it adds value to any organization, mainly in terms of business applications where you need workflows.

Read more »

We were able to meet all of the requirements for functionality that were specified, and we did not experience challenges where we had to compromise on functionality.It has helped us a lot, especially during the initial phase of a project where most of the things are done on paper.It creates workflows to handle business processes. It allows us to route approvals to users without human intervention.Our solutions using Nintex has been most successful in automating HR processes because it allows you to easily and rapidly build solutions that conform to the unique business processes for each entity.This tool set makes it easy to integrate current processes and increase adoption rates and usage for the tool, as well as the process changes to update it on the fly.It provides data accuracy with fewer failures.It saves time as tasks are automated.Only Nintex has the feature which allows attachments to an email.​

Read more »

Cons
It is very flexible because you can design your own main forms, but if there were some templates according to your market, it would be more useful for a new customer. That would make K2 more user friendly and easier to use.I would also like to see the BPM features from Pega implemented, that have to do with the implementation of AI, and the robotics.

Read more »

The security features for this solution need to be improved.We are currently facing a lot of issues with Nintex, and we are trying to move away from this solution.Nintex seems to be very server intensive. It is one of the reasons that we are moving to a different product on the SharePoint 2016 platform.​Bring all features available from the on-premise product into the cloud version and the workflow error reporting.​Converting a document from PDF to MS Word, or vice versa, needs to be improved.User interface could use some improvement. Perhaps integration with Visual Studio or SharePoint Designer would be useful.Currently, copying workflow actions from one workflow to another is not possible. Also, the Office 365 solution is not as mature as on-premise.While Nintex Workflow has pretty robust troubleshooting abilities, I think that improving the default logging and notifications would be helpful.

Read more »

Pricing and Cost Advice
Information Not Available
The annual support costs are expensive.Our maintenance costs are reduced.Offering a licensing model that allows for multiple small workflows would be a huge improvement to an already great platform.Nintex products are expensive, but valuable. Licensing in on-premise was historically based on a perpetual model, where you’d license per Web front-end. However, they are switching exclusively to a consumption (subscription) model, where you purchase the number of workflows you think you’ll use in your environment, and can scale up from there.

Read more »

report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Business Process Management solutions are best for your needs.
366,593 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Ranking
Views
3,923
Comparisons
2,526
Reviews
2
Average Words per Review
425
Avg. Rating
7.5
Views
2,742
Comparisons
2,007
Reviews
9
Average Words per Review
306
Avg. Rating
7.7
Top Comparisons
Compared 30% of the time.
Compared 15% of the time.
Compared 11% of the time.
Compared 28% of the time.
Compared 17% of the time.
Compared 11% of the time.
Also Known As
blackpearlNintex Workflow Platform
Learn
K2
Nintex
Overview
The K2 blackpearl business process application platform empowers you to create solutions for everything from onboarding and expense claims to budgeting and campaign management. K2 blackpearl can transform your business by boosting productivity and increasing operational efficiency - from anywhere, at any time.

At Nintex, our goal is to make work more meaningful by improving business processes. With the Nintex Platform, your organization can manage, automate, and optimize your business processes - all with clicks, not code.

Offer
Learn more about K2 blackpearl
Learn more about Nintex Workflow
Sample Customers
SEA CorpAsiacell, Hawke’s Bay Regional Council, National Metrology Institute of South Africa, Norwegian Olympic Committee, Schnitzer Steel, MT Højgaard, Lippuner
Find out what your peers are saying about K2 blackpearl vs. Nintex Workflow and other solutions. Updated: September 2019.
366,593 professionals have used our research since 2012.
We monitor all Business Process Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
Sign Up with Email