We performed a comparison between Nintex Process Platform and Pega BPM based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Business Process Management (BPM) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."It creates workflows to handle business processes. It allows us to route approvals to users without human intervention."
"The SharePoint feature is a really good connection, there are many features that are good."
"The latest version of Nintex has many features. We have a clear roadmap and the necessary application to integrate it into our platform."
"This tool is really helpful in reducing a lot of manual work. Its drag and drop components help to create a workflow faster than SharePoint Workflow Designer."
"It is a scalable product."
"I find it useful to utilize LDAP query action to find out the status of a particular user."
"This tool set makes it easy to integrate current processes and increase adoption rates and usage for the tool, as well as the process changes to update it on the fly."
"It has integration with BI and Analytics tools, and RPA toolsets as well."
"The solution's case management is its most valuable aspect."
"The most valuable feature is flexibility, as we can configure it to best suit our requirements."
"While Pega technical support is okay, it also depends on the issues you need help with and who your contact is with Pega."
"The stability has been good. We haven't had any issues."
"It cuts down the time taken for coding. Earlier it used take for us four hours to do a particular code. Now this can be done in less than 30 minutes. That's the kind of productivity gains you can get."
"There are a lot of frameworks in the product. I use Pega PRPC the most."
"Decreased time for plane departures and landing, supported analytical insight for planning of three to six month forecasting, and helped with operational decision planning and support."
"The most valuable feature is the situational layer cake."
"The interface could be better and more language support is needed in the development environment or in the solutions platform in general."
"The product’s support for the mobile platform and its ability to handle artificial loads could be better."
"Nintex is still at the starting point of integrating with AI. It has integrated with a very small piece of artificial intelligence., like only integrated with the Google Cloud. There is a benefit, like a no-code and low-code solution. But, again, if you are a developer, especially if you are a hardcore developer, you are using your code knowledge, its skills, and all. And, suddenly, you are moving into the low-code solution, and then you will feel, like, so many things you can't achieve with the low-code solution."
"The licensing needs to be improved. Right now, we find it's getting more expensive to use the product."
"We'd like to have integration with SharePoint."
"Unfortunately, Nintex Workflow is not that stable. We are looking at shifting to another tool."
"The security features for this solution need to be improved."
"The solution does not integrate with many platforms."
"I would like to see Pega BPM improve the user experience."
"An area for improvement in Pega BPM is security. It's secure, but it still has a lot of vulnerabilities. Pega BPM is robust, but it still needs some improvement performance-wise."
"This is a quite expensive product."
"The pricing model needs to be improved. Right now, it's too expensive."
"If it could also be integrated with robotics, it could help with a lot of things, even if we don't have APIs, we could still talk to other applications. If it could invoke a bot, for example."
"There have been some performance scalability issues. Suppose you want to add more users. You go from, say, 800 users to 1,500 users, and sometimes that creates issues for which there is no clear explanation. To fix it you have to escalate it with customer service and sometimes the response is not up to the mark in resolving those issues."
"The previous versions had good training documents but the updated versions need to improve the documentation."
"The biggest thing I have seen is when going from one version to another and upgrading to the latest version, it takes a pretty long time for an organization to go through an upgrade process. I think that's an area where they can make it a little smoother."
Nintex Process Platform is ranked 9th in Business Process Management (BPM) with 21 reviews while Pega BPM is ranked 3rd in Business Process Management (BPM) with 55 reviews. Nintex Process Platform is rated 8.0, while Pega BPM is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of Nintex Process Platform writes "Offers good integration capabilities and easy to learn and good stability". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Pega BPM writes "Low code with great APIs and good flexibility". Nintex Process Platform is most compared with Camunda, IBM BPM, Appian, SAP Signavio Process Manager and Bizagi, whereas Pega BPM is most compared with ServiceNow, Camunda, Appian, Microsoft Power Apps and IBM BPM. See our Nintex Process Platform vs. Pega BPM report.
See our list of best Business Process Management (BPM) vendors and best Process Automation vendors.
We monitor all Business Process Management (BPM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.