Kaminario Cloud Fabric [EOL] vs Red Hat Gluster Storage comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Kaminario Cloud Fabric [EOL] and Red Hat Gluster Storage based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about StarWind, Nutanix, Red Hat and others in Software Defined Storage (SDS).
To learn more, read our detailed Software Defined Storage (SDS) Report (Updated: March 2024).
768,578 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Use Kaminario Cloud Fabric [EOL]?
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pricing and Cost Advice
Information Not Available
  • "If you need cheap storage, but still need high availability, it's a good product to look at."
  • More Red Hat Gluster Storage Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Software Defined Storage (SDS) solutions are best for your needs.
    768,578 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Ask a question

    Earn 20 points

    Top Answer:The performance of the solution must be improved.
    Top Answer:The solution is used in banks and financial institutions. Customers use the replicated configuration for high availability. They either use the native Gluster client or configure it with NFS… more »
    Ranking
    Unranked
    In Software Defined Storage (SDS)
    Views
    968
    Comparisons
    608
    Reviews
    1
    Average Words per Review
    344
    Rating
    8.0
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    Cloud Fabric
    Red Hat Gluster, Red Hat Storage Server
    Learn More
    Overview

    Kaminario Cloud Fabric forms the storage backbone of the modern software-defined data center. Cloud Fabric delivers the proven technology capability of Kaminario’s Composable Data Platform with the economics and agility of a software-defined storage solution.

    Red Hat Gluster Storage (formerly known as Red Hat Storage Server) is a software-defined storage (SDS) platform designed to handle the requirements of traditional file storage—high-capacity tasks like backup and archival as well as high-performance tasks of analytics and virtualization. But unlike traditional storage systems, Red Hat Gluster Storage isn’t rigid and expensive. It easily scales across bare metal, virtual, container, and cloud deployments.

    Sample Customers
    Information Not Available
    NTT Plala, McMaster University, University of Basque Country, Goodtech ASA, Cox Automotive, Raidió Teilifís Éireann (RTÉ), SaskTel, Glashart Media, Casio
    Top Industries
    No Data Available
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company17%
    Financial Services Firm13%
    Comms Service Provider12%
    Government9%
    Company Size
    No Data Available
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business23%
    Midsize Enterprise15%
    Large Enterprise62%
    Buyer's Guide
    Software Defined Storage (SDS)
    March 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about StarWind, Nutanix, Red Hat and others in Software Defined Storage (SDS). Updated: March 2024.
    768,578 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    Kaminario Cloud Fabric [EOL] doesn't meet the minimum requirements to be ranked in Software Defined Storage (SDS) while Red Hat Gluster Storage is ranked 12th in Software Defined Storage (SDS) with 3 reviews. Kaminario Cloud Fabric [EOL] is rated 0.0, while Red Hat Gluster Storage is rated 7.6. On the other hand, the top reviewer of Red Hat Gluster Storage writes "A scalable and easy-to-implement solution that has an excellent technical support team". Kaminario Cloud Fabric [EOL] is most compared with , whereas Red Hat Gluster Storage is most compared with VMware vSAN, IBM Spectrum Scale, Red Hat Ceph Storage, LizardFS and LINBIT SDS.

    See our list of best Software Defined Storage (SDS) vendors.

    We monitor all Software Defined Storage (SDS) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.