Kaseya IT Center vs Pandora FMS comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Kaseya Logo
120 views|101 comparisons
100% willing to recommend
Pandora FMS Logo
1,249 views|906 comparisons
100% willing to recommend
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Kaseya IT Center and Pandora FMS based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Zabbix, Microsoft, ServiceNow and others in Server Monitoring.
To learn more, read our detailed Server Monitoring Report (Updated: April 2024).
768,578 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"It is a product that is very easy to learn.""The solution's technical support is good."

More Kaseya IT Center Pros →

"The most valuable feature is that it is an all-in-one monitoring system.""We are able to control our business with this all-in-one monitoring tool.""Thanks to its flexibility, I have been able to adapt the tool to our servers and find out quickly how their console works.""This product has allowed us to identify and correct certain issues that were affecting our solution.""The network monitoring and configuration within this solution is very good.""I like this solution a lot because it has a very large Hispanic community and the platform looks very friendly.""The most valuable features are auto-discovery and automatic detection of the network topology and network monitoring.""The solution has good dashboards and graphics."

More Pandora FMS Pros →

Cons
"In Kaseya, agents are shown as offline at times, and it is an area that is being improved.""At times, there is degradation in performance."

More Kaseya IT Center Cons →

"The price for Pandora FMS is expensive.""It would be useful if Pandora FMS included an ISO image (or «software appliance») for each big company that leases virtual private machines (VPS), just like in AWS.""We would like the real-time monitoring of an interface to be improved within this solution.""I find that this software is resource heavy, and demands a lot of processing capacity.""Improvements are needed for server and network discovery, including service-based discovery.""Pandora could deliver better analytics out of the box. You can work around these limitations with the help of other tools like Grafana. The shortcomings are mostly on the graphical side. The built-in report generators are a bit limited in some areas.""Their support is good, but it is just online communication. It would be great to be able to just call someone and talk to them instead of always writing. It works well for me because I am a decent communicator in email, but some people might find it difficult to describe in a written fashion and communicate with them that way. There is a learning curve to the interface, but once you get used to it, it is actually very powerful. They have a lot of options, but people struggle with the interface. They've improved it though, and it is getting better. They need to keep improving the learning curve to help buy-in. I'm the guy that manages it, so I'm comfortable with it. They can refine the upgrade agents to be easier. They can also do more refinement in end-user usability because not everyone is strong technically, and people who aren't strong technically might be averse to the product, even though it has come a long way. It has a complete GUI and everything.""Pandora FMS is an overall great monitoring solution, but it does not have a community that is as large as Zabbix or Nagios."

More Pandora FMS Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "I rate the product's price a six on a scale of one to ten, where one is expensive, and ten is cheap."
  • More Kaseya IT Center Pricing and Cost Advice →

  • "Only one payment and it includes support, updates, new versions, and access to the complete library of plugins except for SAP and z/OS."
  • "Pandora FMS is easy to implement and the pricing of licenses is competitive."
  • "You get the license and it includes updates, new versions, and access to the complete library of modules."
  • "My rule of thumb would be that if you need more than thirty agents, and you lack an automation tool such as Chef or Puppet, you will save a lot of time and money going to the Enterprise edition."
  • "In terms of money, the Enterprise version is the cheapest that I have found after a market study."
  • "The open-source version offers 100% functionality and the hardware requirements for a solution like this one are very modest."
  • "Growing the solution or migrating to the Enterprise version is easy, and various plans are available."
  • "The Open Source Community Edition is great to just explore the software, or use it on medium-sized infrastructures."
  • More Pandora FMS Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Server Monitoring solutions are best for your needs.
    768,578 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Top Answer:The solution's technical support is good.
    Top Answer:Kaseya has currently fixed some of the issues related to Kaseya Live Connect (KLC). In Kaseya, agents are shown as offline at times, and it is an area that is being improved. Our company's clients… more »
    Top Answer:I use Kaseya IT Center in my company for installation purposes, scripts, and Windows-related issues. Our company had to use the solution to troubleshoot some issues in Windows. The tool is useful for… more »
    Top Answer:Features I have found most valuable with Pandora are the personalized metrics and the simplicity of data.
    Top Answer:Pandora is reasonably priced, and the cost depends on the environment.
    Top Answer:I would like for the solution to be faster and have a better tolerance between parallel servers for Pandora and Pest Control. In the next release, I'd like to see, when it comes to monitoring, the… more »
    Ranking
    21st
    out of 42 in Server Monitoring
    Views
    120
    Comparisons
    101
    Reviews
    1
    Average Words per Review
    788
    Rating
    8.0
    10th
    out of 42 in Server Monitoring
    Views
    1,249
    Comparisons
    906
    Reviews
    7
    Average Words per Review
    396
    Rating
    8.7
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    IT Center
    Learn More
    Overview
    IT Center overcome IT complexity and manage your entire IT environment to improve service quality, increase efficiency, and deliver new services rapidly and securely. IT Center is a comprehensive IT management solution that allows IT departments and Managed Service Providers (MSPs) to centrally manage and automate all of IT, from a single console.

    Pandora FMS is a monitoring as a service (MaaS) solution that is ideal for companies with at least 100 or more devices. Instead of multiple, difficult-to-integrate monitoring systems, Pandora FMS is an all-in-one solution that is easy to use. The software is able to untangle complicated technology infrastructures to easily identify the root cause of issues in order to find the most efficient solution. It does so by analyzing everything in your system, from databases and applications to services and desktops, as well as communications.

    Pandora FMS Features

    Pandora FMS has many valuable key features. Some of the most useful ones include:

    • Application Monitoring (APM)
    • IoT monitoring
    • Log collection
    • Inventory
    • Issue management / ITSM
    • Mainframe monitoring
    • Network monitoring
    • Remote control
    • Synthetic monitoring
    • Service oriented monitoring
    • Server monitoring
    • User experience monitoring
    • Virtualization & cloud

    Pandora FMS Benefits

    There are many benefits to implementing Pandora FMS. Some of the biggest advantages the solution offers include:

    • Comprehensive overview: Pandora FMS provides a comprehensive overview of your system to make troubleshooting easy. It also provides all the tools to monitor and analyze an extensive range of data, from traffic to connectivity.
    • Easy forecasting: With Pandora FMS, you can use your network diagram for forecasting solutions, which gives you the necessary info you need to perform maintenance. 
    • Proactive solutions: Issues are proactively addressed. Pandora FMS provides alerts 24/7 so you can deal with problems before they grow even bigger. This also helps your organization eliminate any down time. 
    • Solve future problems: Another benefit of implementing Pandora FMS is that it enables you to optimize your services to ensure that future issues are minimized. In addition, they offer around-the-clock monitoring and automated solutions. As a result, the solution enables you to operate your organization with maximum efficiency all the time, saving you money and time. 
    • Personalized service maps: Pandora FMS allows you to create detailed, personalized service maps that can help you identify any shortcomings in your system and address them as soon as possible. 
    • SLA and availability reports: With Pandora FMS, you receive critical alerts when SLA levels aren’t met, which also helps you understand when your applications and systems are not meeting your business goals.

    Reviews from Real Users

    Below are some reviews and helpful feedback written by PeerSpot users currently using the Pandora FMS solution.

    PeerSpot user Marc C., Systems Analyst at a university, says, "It is easy to create your own custom modules if you just know a little bit of scripting. If you have unique requirements, you can just make your own modules. You can even grab checks from other vendors. There are open-source checks for various things such as SMTP, etc. It is really flexible. It is reliable. It does the job, and it alerts. It is also surprisingly feature-rich. It is very mature for a not-so-known product."

    Another reviewer, Alexandre J., comments, “What I value most about Pandora FMS is the simplicity of working with it. The speed of locating problems and to be able to solve them quickly, so that it affects our client's network infrastructure as little as possible, is very valuable.

    Thanks to Pandora FMS we have everything unified in the same point and it is highly efficient.”

    Sample Customers
    1st Community Federal Credit Union, AMC, All Coveredês, Atlanta Technology Force, Babcockês, Baker Triangle, BankFirst, Beltone New England, Big Brothers Big Sisters
    Rakuten, Prosegur, Repsol, Teléfonica, Allianz, Ottawa Hospital, Hughes
    Top Industries
    No Data Available
    REVIEWERS
    Computer Software Company23%
    Healthcare Company15%
    Financial Services Firm15%
    Comms Service Provider15%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company16%
    Comms Service Provider13%
    Educational Organization10%
    Financial Services Firm8%
    Company Size
    No Data Available
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business61%
    Midsize Enterprise22%
    Large Enterprise17%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business26%
    Midsize Enterprise25%
    Large Enterprise50%
    Buyer's Guide
    Server Monitoring
    April 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about Zabbix, Microsoft, ServiceNow and others in Server Monitoring. Updated: April 2024.
    768,578 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    Kaseya IT Center is ranked 21st in Server Monitoring with 3 reviews while Pandora FMS is ranked 10th in Server Monitoring with 22 reviews. Kaseya IT Center is rated 8.0, while Pandora FMS is rated 9.2. The top reviewer of Kaseya IT Center writes "A tool that helps a user speed up the process of installation and automate certain processes". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Pandora FMS writes "The open architecture is easy to extend and enhance". Kaseya IT Center is most compared with Tanium, whereas Pandora FMS is most compared with Zabbix, PRTG Network Monitor, Wazuh, Nagios XI and SolarWinds NPM.

    See our list of best Server Monitoring vendors.

    We monitor all Server Monitoring reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.