Compare Kaspersky Endpoint Security vs. McAfee Endpoint Security

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Most Helpful Review
Find out what your peers are saying about Kaspersky Endpoint Security vs. McAfee Endpoint Security and other solutions. Updated: September 2020.
442,194 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros
"Its most valuable features are its scalability and advanced threat protection for customers.""I am told that we get over 100 million emails a month. This filters them down and allows only somewhere about three million emails, which is a great help.""For the initial first level of support, we provide it from our side. If there's escalation required, we use Cisco tech for the AMP. And again, they are perfect. I mean, one of the best, compared to any other vendors.""The most valuable features of this solution are the IPS and the integration with ISE.""The simplicity of use is its most valuable feature. You can very clearly see things.""The stability of the solution is perfect. I believe it's the most stable solution on the market right now.""I am really satisfied with the technical support.""It is a very stable program."

More Cisco AMP for Endpoints Pros »

"We swtiched to Kaspersky Endpoint Security because we found our previous solution did not meet our requirements.""We have gained advanced threat protection without investing more into that area.""It performs quite well as a firewall protection provider.""The centralized management is a nice features. It gives us the leeway to deal with other things as protection is being carried on in the background. We do not have to keep on watching as long as we have the right updates. It also saves us time.""The blocking feature is the most valuable feature.""It helps to improve our security for our mobile and VMware infrastructure. The remote tasks are great.""We used to have a lot of phishing attacks and all these kind of things for end-users so we decided that we needed endpoint security. We evaluated some solutions and found that Kaspersky is the most appropriate in terms of endpoint security and the speed of the user machine. The encryption is a major factor from our end.""The signature update is done securely."

More Kaspersky Endpoint Security Pros »

"The product helps us by contacting us if there are any virus attacks on our system.""We receive good protection with this solution.""This is a good solution for antivirus and malware protection.""The reporting capabilities are a valuable feature. In enables more visibility on our network.""It has improved my organization because it helps with visibility, in terms of security. We can see the actual attack and can contain it. The antivirus can detect that.""The loss prevention feature would be the most valuable.""Anyone can use it, the protection is good, and they have all of the features.""The most valuable features are the adaptive tech on McAfee."

More McAfee Endpoint Security Pros »

Cons
"We would like to have an API integration with a SIEM solution, because as far as I know, it currently hasn't yet been released.""I would like them to add whatever makes filtering more advanced in scanning and blocking for malware in emails.""The solution needs more in-depth analytics.""In the next version of this solution, I would like to see the addition of local authentication.""The initial setup is a bit complex because you need to execute existing antiviruses or security software that you have on your device.""In the next release, I would for it to have back up abilities. I would like the ability to go back to a point in time to when my PC was uninfected and to the moment of when the infection happened.""The reporting and analytics areas of the solution need to be improved.""I would like more seamless integration."

More Cisco AMP for Endpoints Cons »

"I think it would be good for them to consider and cloud integration capabilities.""It's does not have the architecture or structure to scale up.""I would like to have more forensic features. For example, if we are hit by an attack, I would like to have tools to investigate what kind of attack, who has attacked, how it was attacked, and what we could do to stop this kind of attack in the future. I would like to have more forensics capability built into Kaspersky.""I would like to see better reporting.""If someone has the older version of the solution, and wants to install a newer version, they must remove all of the previous applications. Otherwise, there will be issues with the solution.""It needs more computer resources. They should have more anti-spam features.""The reports aren't so good. To make it a perfect ten they should improve the reports and web interface.""There should be some AI involved. We already have machine learning involved in recent releases but machine learning should be more enhanced in the upcoming versions."

More Kaspersky Endpoint Security Cons »

"Tech support is not as helpful as they were in the past.""Tech support is not as helpful as they were in the past.""One of the drawbacks is that it is not 100% secure.""The DAC (Dynamic Application Containment) component of this product needs improvement.""The endpoint has room for improvement because it's restrictive, it's very sensitive. Sometimes it can delete something that you need and so sometimes you have to disable the antivirus.""We have a lot of problems with the user experience and it's difficult to implement. MacAfee's better than the ancient anti-virus solutions but it's a little slow to resolve. Many files with malware were destroyed through the network, and MacAfee doesn't detect anything.""Its pricing needs to be improved.""McAfee Endpoint Protection could improve the word control feature."

More McAfee Endpoint Security Cons »

Pricing and Cost Advice
"The costs of 50 licenses of AMP for three years is around $9,360.""The price is very good.""The visibility that we have into the endpoint and the forensics that we're able to collect give us value for the price. This is not an overly expensive solution, considering all the things that are provided. You get great performance and value for the cost.""Whenever you are doing the licensing process, I would highly advise to look at what other Cisco solutions you have in your organization, then evaluate if an Enterprise Agreement is the best way to go. In our case, it was the best way to go. Since we had so many other Cisco products, we were able to tie those in. We were actually able to get several Cisco security solutions for less than if we had bought three or four Cisco security solutions independently or ad hoc.""In our case, it is a straightforward annual payment through our Enterprise Agreement.""Our company was very happy with the price of Cisco AMP. It was about a third of what we were paying for System Center Endpoint Protection.""There are a couple of different consumption models: Pay up front, or if you have an enterprise agreement, you can do a monthly thing. Check your licensing possibilities and see what's best for your organization.""The Enterprise Agreement is like an all-you-can-eat buffet of Cisco products. In that vein, it was very affordable."

More Cisco AMP for Endpoints Pricing and Cost Advice »

"It is a cost-effective product.""The licensing is fine, and it is well within reasonable rates.""It's a little more expensive compared to other competitors like Symantec.""For 300 nodes, we pay about 15,000 Malaysian Ringgit ($3,500 USD)."

More Kaspersky Endpoint Security Pricing and Cost Advice »

"The pricing is comparable to other solutions on the market.""This product is costly.""It's fairly priced compared to other products on the market.""Pricing is reasonable and runs at a cost per user per year."

More McAfee Endpoint Security Pricing and Cost Advice »

report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Endpoint Protection (EPP) for Business solutions are best for your needs.
442,194 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Answers from the Community
Nadeem Syed
Questions from the Community
Top Answer: The solution's integration capabilities are excellent. It's one of the best features.
Top Answer: Nice to have URL management, password protection of the app, more details of the machine & user running the app.
Top Answer: The primary use case is for endpoint protection. For the larger deployments, we use it for our policy enforcement as… more »
Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Top Answer: McAfee EndPoint Security has a lot of good features that work well if they are implemented properly.
Top Answer: This solution is difficult to implement. There are lots of features but it has to be implemented the right way. I would… more »
Top Answer: This is part of our network security solution. We have it running on different servers and workstations that are on… more »
Popular Comparisons
Also Known As
Kaspersky Work Space SecurityMcAfee Complete Endpoint Protection, McAfee Endpoint Protection, Total Protection for Endpoint, Intel Security Total Protection for Endpoint, MCAFEE Complete Endpoint Protection
Learn
Cisco
Kaspersky Lab
McAfee
Overview

Advanced Malware Protection (AMP) is subscription-based, managed through a web-based management console, and deployed on a variety of platforms that protects endpoints, network, email and web Traffic. AMP key features include the following: Global threat intelligence to proactively defend against known and emerging threats, Advanced sandboxing that performs automated static and dynamic analysis of files against more than 700 behavioral indicators, Point-in-time malware detection and blocking in real time and Continuous analysis and retrospective security regardless of the file's disposition and Continuous analysis and retrospective security.

Kaspersky Endpoint Security is a multi-layered endpoint protection platform, based on true cybersecurity technologies. This tightly integrated solution combines fully scalable protection capabilities for physical, virtual and cloud-based endpoints including desktops, servers, mobile devices and embedded systems. Every endpoint can be managed through one unified console, giving you a complete security overview, no matter how extensive your infrastructure. Kaspersky Endpoint Security delivers a reliable, enterprise-ready security platform, providing data to automatically enrich your SOC. Endpoint vulnerabilities and protection are managed together through one console, improving efficiency and reducing your TCO. It protects you from ransomware, exploits and even the most advanced forms of cyberthreats. It has Easy and effective centralized web, device and application controls reduce your attack surface and help keep users safe. And FIPS 140.2 certified full disk encryption helps fully protect confidential data on stationary and mobile devices.

McAfee Complete Endpoint Protection allows you to protect all of your devices with intelligent, collaborative security, in one easy-to-manage, integrated solution. Our integrated endpoint security framework helps remove redundancies, enables fast, proven performance and offers an architecture to align both current and future security investments. With a flexible choice of cloud-based or a local management console, security administrators also get true centralized management that simplifies ongoing tasks, deployment and monitoring.

Offer
Learn more about Cisco AMP for Endpoints
Learn more about Kaspersky Endpoint Security
Learn more about McAfee Endpoint Security
Sample Customers
Heritage Bank, Mobile County Schools, NHL University, Thunder Bay Regional, Yokogawa Electric, Sam Houston State University, First Financial BankACMS, Arqiva, Pakistan International Airlines, RAO UESinHouseIT, Seagate Technology
Top Industries
REVIEWERS
Healthcare Company20%
Government13%
University7%
Comms Service Provider7%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company27%
Comms Service Provider26%
Government6%
Retailer3%
REVIEWERS
Financial Services Firm31%
Construction Company15%
Security Firm8%
Comms Service Provider8%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company27%
Comms Service Provider25%
Media Company6%
Retailer5%
REVIEWERS
Government19%
Financial Services Firm14%
Computer Software Company14%
Healthcare Company14%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company41%
Comms Service Provider14%
Government6%
Media Company5%
Company Size
REVIEWERS
Small Business36%
Midsize Enterprise16%
Large Enterprise48%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Small Business21%
Midsize Enterprise25%
Large Enterprise53%
REVIEWERS
Small Business68%
Midsize Enterprise14%
Large Enterprise18%
REVIEWERS
Small Business24%
Midsize Enterprise31%
Large Enterprise45%
Find out what your peers are saying about Kaspersky Endpoint Security vs. McAfee Endpoint Security and other solutions. Updated: September 2020.
442,194 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Kaspersky Endpoint Security is ranked 10th in Endpoint Protection (EPP) for Business with 17 reviews while McAfee Endpoint Security is ranked 12th in Endpoint Protection (EPP) for Business with 17 reviews. Kaspersky Endpoint Security is rated 8.0, while McAfee Endpoint Security is rated 7.8. The top reviewer of Kaspersky Endpoint Security writes "A mature product offering good protection and very good features". On the other hand, the top reviewer of McAfee Endpoint Security writes "Enterprise endpoint security offerings are centrally managed and defend against the full threat spectrum from zero-day exploits to advanced targeted attacks". Kaspersky Endpoint Security is most compared with Symantec End-user Endpoint Security, Bitdefender GravityZone Ultra, ESET Endpoint Security, Microsoft Windows Defender and Trend Micro Deep Security, whereas McAfee Endpoint Security is most compared with Symantec End-user Endpoint Security, CrowdStrike Falcon, Microsoft Windows Defender, CylancePROTECT and Sophos EPP Suite. See our Kaspersky Endpoint Security vs. McAfee Endpoint Security report.

See our list of best Endpoint Protection (EPP) for Business vendors.

We monitor all Endpoint Protection (EPP) for Business reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.