Compare Kaspersky Endpoint Security vs. Panda Security Adaptive Defense

Kaspersky Endpoint Security is ranked 10th in Endpoint Protection for Business with 19 reviews while Panda Security Adaptive Defense is ranked 39th in Endpoint Protection for Business with 1 review. Kaspersky Endpoint Security is rated 7.8, while Panda Security Adaptive Defense is rated 0. The top reviewer of Kaspersky Endpoint Security writes "Enables us to reduce costs and offers manufacturing control". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Panda Security Adaptive Defense writes "Enables you to drill down and get a good overview of which applications you are using that are connecting a player to the next local operation center". Kaspersky Endpoint Security is most compared with Symantec Endpoint Protection (SEP), Bitdefender GravityZone and ESET Endpoint Security, whereas Panda Security Adaptive Defense is most compared with Microsoft Windows Defender, ESET Endpoint Security and Kaspersky Endpoint Security.
Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Most Helpful Review
Use Panda Security Adaptive Defense? Share your opinion.
Find out what your peers are saying about Symantec, HCL, Microsoft and others in Endpoint Protection for Business. Updated: September 2019.
370,827 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros
The advice I would give someone implementing this solution is that the management of the solution is very easy. You don't need a lot of people to manage the solution.The signature update is done securely.We used to have a lot of phishing attacks and all these kind of things for end-users so we decided that we needed endpoint security. We evaluated some solutions and found that Kaspersky is the most appropriate in terms of endpoint security and the speed of the user machine. The encryption is a major factor from our end.It helps to improve our security for our mobile and VMware infrastructure. The remote tasks are great.The blocking feature is the most valuable feature.The centralized management is a nice features. It gives us the leeway to deal with other things as protection is being carried on in the background. We do not have to keep on watching as long as we have the right updates. It also saves us time.It performs quite well as a firewall protection provider.We have gained advanced threat protection without investing more into that area.

Read more »

The feature I find most valuable is the advance search engine.

Read more »

Cons
This solution needs improvement in the reporting section. Reporting in Kaspersky Endpoint is good but it's not that great. The platform needs to centralize reporting control.There have been some performance issues. They provide good security, but this slows down the performance of machines' servers. The software is not updating as frequently as we need.There should be some AI involved. We already have machine learning involved in recent releases but machine learning should be more enhanced in the upcoming versions.The reports aren't so good. To make it a perfect ten they should improve the reports and web interface.It needs more computer resources. They should have more anti-spam features.If someone has the older version of the solution, and wants to install a newer version, they must remove all of the previous applications. Otherwise, there will be issues with the solution.I would like to see better reporting.It's does not have the architecture or structure to scale up.

Read more »

I would like to see better data protection.

Read more »

Pricing and Cost Advice
It's a little more expensive compared to other competitors like Symantec.The licensing is fine, and it is well within reasonable rates.It is a cost-effective product.I received a very good deal with Kaspersky.It is a cost-effective endpoint security service.It is quite standard, because we use the volume licensing.The licensing is based per agent. You can get discounts if you have more agents.Pricing is very competitive and licensing is very much ethical.

Read more »

Our licensing fee is 1M Euro per month, so it is about 80 Euro's per user.

Read more »

report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Endpoint Protection for Business solutions are best for your needs.
370,827 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Ranking
Views
12,630
Comparisons
10,847
Reviews
18
Average Words per Review
299
Avg. Rating
7.9
Views
4,087
Comparisons
3,091
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
662
Avg. Rating
N/A
Top Comparisons
Also Known As
Kaspersky Work Space SecurityPanda Security Adaptive Defense 360, Panda Security Endpoint Protection, Panda Security for Desktops
Learn
Kaspersky Lab
Panda Security
Overview
Kaspersky Endpoint Security is a multi-layered endpoint protection platform, based on true cybersecurity technologies. This tightly integrated solution combines fully scalable protection capabilities for physical, virtual and cloud-based endpoints including desktops, servers, mobile devices and embedded systems. Every endpoint can be managed through one unified console, giving you a complete security overview, no matter how extensive your infrastructure. Kaspersky Endpoint Security delivers a reliable, enterprise-ready security platform, providing data to automatically enrich your SOC. Endpoint vulnerabilities and protection are managed together through one console, improving efficiency and reducing your TCO. It protects you from ransomware, exploits and even the most advanced forms of cyberthreats. It has Easy and effective centralized web, device and application controls reduce your attack surface and help keep users safe. And FIPS 140.2 certified full disk encryption helps fully protect confidential data on stationary and mobile devices.

Adaptive Defense 360 is a cyber-security service that combines next-generation protection (NG EPP) and detection and remediation technologies (EDR), with the ability to classify 100% of running processes.

Offer
Learn more about Kaspersky Endpoint Security
Learn more about Panda Security Adaptive Defense
Sample Customers
ACMS, Arqiva, Pakistan International Airlines, RAO UESIndra, Valea AB, Fineit, Aemcom, Data Solutions INC., Gloucestershire NHS, Golden Star Resources Ltd, Hispania Racing Team, Instituto Dos Museus e da ConserÊo, Escuelas Pias Provincia Emaus, Axiom Housing Association, Municipality of Bjuv, Lesedi Nuclear, Mullsj_ municipality, Eng. skolan Norr AB, Dalakraft AB, Peter Green Haulage Ltd
Top Industries
REVIEWERS
Financial Services Firm30%
Construction Company20%
Manufacturing Company10%
Insurance Company10%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Software R&D Company19%
Financial Services Firm18%
Comms Service Provider11%
Retailer7%
No Data Available
Find out what your peers are saying about Symantec, HCL, Microsoft and others in Endpoint Protection for Business. Updated: September 2019.
370,827 professionals have used our research since 2012.
We monitor all Endpoint Protection for Business reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
Sign Up with Email