Most Helpful Review
Researched Trend Micro Apex One but chose Cisco AMP for Endpoints: It is stable, easy to scale and I like the price
Researched Trend Micro Apex One but chose Kaspersky Endpoint Security: Excellent at detecting viruses, very stable and easy to use
Find out what your peers are saying about Kaspersky Endpoint Security vs. Trend Micro Apex One and other solutions. Updated: September 2020.
441,672 professionals have used our research since 2012.
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
"Its most valuable features are its scalability and advanced threat protection for customers."
"I am told that we get over 100 million emails a month. This filters them down and allows only somewhere about three million emails, which is a great help."
"For the initial first level of support, we provide it from our side. If there's escalation required, we use Cisco tech for the AMP. And again, they are perfect. I mean, one of the best, compared to any other vendors."
"The most valuable features of this solution are the IPS and the integration with ISE."
"The simplicity of use is its most valuable feature. You can very clearly see things."
"The stability of the solution is perfect. I believe it's the most stable solution on the market right now."
"I am really satisfied with the technical support."
"It is a very stable program."
"We swtiched to Kaspersky Endpoint Security because we found our previous solution did not meet our requirements."
"We have gained advanced threat protection without investing more into that area."
"It performs quite well as a firewall protection provider."
"The centralized management is a nice features. It gives us the leeway to deal with other things as protection is being carried on in the background. We do not have to keep on watching as long as we have the right updates. It also saves us time."
"The blocking feature is the most valuable feature."
"It helps to improve our security for our mobile and VMware infrastructure. The remote tasks are great."
"We used to have a lot of phishing attacks and all these kind of things for end-users so we decided that we needed endpoint security. We evaluated some solutions and found that Kaspersky is the most appropriate in terms of endpoint security and the speed of the user machine. The encryption is a major factor from our end."
"The signature update is done securely."
"The scalability is perfect."
"The DDAN and the sand boxing features are very good and accurate."
"The ease of deployment is one of its most valuable features."
"I would emphasize the ease of use and the quality of operations. Trend Micro is quite stable."
"The product offers almost all of the features the client expects from such a solution."
"This solution protects us from virus attacks before they affect the organization."
"It's a good solution, and they have something called Suite incorporating many, many engines like encryption, GLB, anti-virus."
"Scalable and stable."
"We would like to have an API integration with a SIEM solution, because as far as I know, it currently hasn't yet been released."
"I would like them to add whatever makes filtering more advanced in scanning and blocking for malware in emails."
"The solution needs more in-depth analytics."
"In the next version of this solution, I would like to see the addition of local authentication."
"The initial setup is a bit complex because you need to execute existing antiviruses or security software that you have on your device."
"In the next release, I would for it to have back up abilities. I would like the ability to go back to a point in time to when my PC was uninfected and to the moment of when the infection happened."
"The reporting and analytics areas of the solution need to be improved."
"I would like more seamless integration."
"I think it would be good for them to consider and cloud integration capabilities."
"It's does not have the architecture or structure to scale up."
"I would like to have more forensic features. For example, if we are hit by an attack, I would like to have tools to investigate what kind of attack, who has attacked, how it was attacked, and what we could do to stop this kind of attack in the future. I would like to have more forensics capability built into Kaspersky."
"I would like to see better reporting."
"If someone has the older version of the solution, and wants to install a newer version, they must remove all of the previous applications. Otherwise, there will be issues with the solution."
"It needs more computer resources. They should have more anti-spam features."
"The reports aren't so good. To make it a perfect ten they should improve the reports and web interface."
"There should be some AI involved. We already have machine learning involved in recent releases but machine learning should be more enhanced in the upcoming versions."
"Recently, we had a malware attack and considered looking at other cloud solutions because of this breach."
"I am expecting an Apple featured IDLP solution with OfficeScan, where we have only IDLP. Also, the ADR functionality in our Office Scan solution would be a nice addition. Genrally, the ADR solutions are the only failed ends of the solutions we have found with Trend Micro."
"There is room for improvement in next-gen attacks protection."
"We had a few occasions where we had to turn off our clients' computers to upgrade the drivers."
"Technical support is very very slow. There is no French support. Only English. The experts are in England, the United States, or Japan, I don't know where. So the support is really lacking."
"Product performance needs improvement. Customers face the same performance issues on the endpoint of the product. We need improvement on that side."
"The alert, or warning function, needs to be improved."
"We cover many things, but there is something called ATP, advanced threat prevention. I think they need to invest in this technology."
Pricing and Cost Advice
"The costs of 50 licenses of AMP for three years is around $9,360."
"The price is very good."
"The visibility that we have into the endpoint and the forensics that we're able to collect give us value for the price. This is not an overly expensive solution, considering all the things that are provided. You get great performance and value for the cost."
"Whenever you are doing the licensing process, I would highly advise to look at what other Cisco solutions you have in your organization, then evaluate if an Enterprise Agreement is the best way to go. In our case, it was the best way to go. Since we had so many other Cisco products, we were able to tie those in. We were actually able to get several Cisco security solutions for less than if we had bought three or four Cisco security solutions independently or ad hoc."
"In our case, it is a straightforward annual payment through our Enterprise Agreement."
"Our company was very happy with the price of Cisco AMP. It was about a third of what we were paying for System Center Endpoint Protection."
"There are a couple of different consumption models: Pay up front, or if you have an enterprise agreement, you can do a monthly thing. Check your licensing possibilities and see what's best for your organization."
"The Enterprise Agreement is like an all-you-can-eat buffet of Cisco products. In that vein, it was very affordable."
"It is a cost-effective product."
"The licensing is fine, and it is well within reasonable rates."
"It's a little more expensive compared to other competitors like Symantec."
"For 300 nodes, we pay about 15,000 Malaysian Ringgit ($3,500 USD)."
"Pricing and licensing are competitive with other solutions on the market."
"On a yearly basis, it's about $50,000. There are no costs in addition to the standard licensing fees."
"I think that this product is expensive."
"It's well priced at a yearly rate. The price itself depends on whether the solution is full suite, half suite, or some other engine. It's different according to the consumer's requests."
"Licensing costs depend completely on the number of users or licenses. They have a specific pricing structure. For example, if you are looking for 100 users to be on the product, in the Indian market (we're based in India), the cost is nearly $2,500 to $3,000 maximum for one three-year license."
"The price is reasonable."
Questions from the Community
Top Answer: The solution's integration capabilities are excellent. It's one of the best features.
Top Answer: Nice to have URL management, password protection of the app, more details of the machine & user running the app.
Top Answer: The primary use case is for endpoint protection. For the larger deployments, we use it for our policy enforcement as… more »
Ask a question
Earn 20 points
Top Answer: I’m not familiar with Trend Micro but with BDGZ. BDGZ is in the top 3 in my opinion. It has a full security suite, great… more »
Top Answer: From a technology point of view, it is very simple to install, it's not heavy on the endpoint in terms of the amount of… more »
Top Answer: The price point is exceptionally competitive. And I find that in most cases it's actually better than the competition… more »
Compared 14% of the time.
Compared 11% of the time.
Compared 9% of the time.
Compared 8% of the time.
Compared 2% of the time.
Compared 19% of the time.
Compared 12% of the time.
Compared 8% of the time.
Compared 6% of the time.
Compared 33% of the time.
Compared 14% of the time.
Compared 7% of the time.
Compared 5% of the time.
Compared 3% of the time.
Also Known As
|Kaspersky Work Space Security||OfficeScan, Trend Micro OfficeScan|
|Cisco||Kaspersky Lab||Trend Micro|
Advanced Malware Protection (AMP) is subscription-based, managed through a web-based management console, and deployed on a variety of platforms that protects endpoints, network, email and web Traffic. AMP key features include the following: Global threat intelligence to proactively defend against known and emerging threats, Advanced sandboxing that performs automated static and dynamic analysis of files against more than 700 behavioral indicators, Point-in-time malware detection and blocking in real time and Continuous analysis and retrospective security regardless of the file's disposition and Continuous analysis and retrospective security.
|Kaspersky Endpoint Security is a multi-layered endpoint protection platform, based on true cybersecurity technologies. This tightly integrated solution combines fully scalable protection capabilities for physical, virtual and cloud-based endpoints including desktops, servers, mobile devices and embedded systems. Every endpoint can be managed through one unified console, giving you a complete security overview, no matter how extensive your infrastructure. Kaspersky Endpoint Security delivers a reliable, enterprise-ready security platform, providing data to automatically enrich your SOC. Endpoint vulnerabilities and protection are managed together through one console, improving efficiency and reducing your TCO. It protects you from ransomware, exploits and even the most advanced forms of cyberthreats. It has Easy and effective centralized web, device and application controls reduce your attack surface and help keep users safe. And FIPS 140.2 certified full disk encryption helps fully protect confidential data on stationary and mobile devices.|
Trend Micro Apex One™ protection offers advanced automated threat detection and response against an ever-growing variety of threats, including fileless and ransomware. Our cross-generational blend of modern techniques provides highly tuned endpoint protection that maximizes performance and effectiveness.
Learn more about Cisco AMP for Endpoints
Learn more about Kaspersky Endpoint Security
Learn more about Trend Micro Apex One
|Heritage Bank, Mobile County Schools, NHL University, Thunder Bay Regional, Yokogawa Electric, Sam Houston State University, First Financial Bank||ACMS, Arqiva, Pakistan International Airlines, RAO UES||Atma Jaya Catholic University of Indonesia, A&W Food Services of Canada, Babou, Beth Israel Deaconess Care Organization (BO), DCI Donor Services, Evalueserve, Gulftainer, Hiroshima Prefectural Government, MEDHOST|
Comms Service Provider7%
Computer Software Company26%
Comms Service Provider25%
Financial Services Firm31%
Computer Software Company27%
Comms Service Provider25%
Financial Services Firm29%
Museum Or Institution6%
Computer Software Company28%
Comms Service Provider22%