Kaspersky Sandbox [EOL] vs Proofpoint Targeted Attack Protection comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Kaspersky Sandbox [EOL] and Proofpoint Targeted Attack Protection based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Palo Alto Networks, ESET and others in Advanced Threat Protection (ATP).
To learn more, read our detailed Advanced Threat Protection (ATP) Report (Updated: March 2024).
768,415 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Ranking
Unranked
In Advanced Threat Protection (ATP)
Views
826
Comparisons
616
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
Buyer's Guide
Advanced Threat Protection (ATP)
March 2024
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Palo Alto Networks, ESET and others in Advanced Threat Protection (ATP). Updated: March 2024.
768,415 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Comparisons
Also Known As
Targeted Attack Protection
Learn More
Overview

Today’s businesses need to combat the growing number and complexity of modern threats that bypass existing antivirus and EPP-class solutions, such as unknown malware, new viruses and ransomware, zero-day exploits and others. At the same time, there is a global shortage of skilled cybersecurity professionals, which can make it tough and expensive to hire them. Companies are looking for ways to automate the detection and response to advanced threats as much as possible. Kaspersky Sandbox harnesses our best expert practices in combating complex threats and APT-level attacks, providing advanced threat protection without the need for information security analysts.

More than 90% of targeted attacks start with email—and these threats are always evolving. Proofpoint Targeted Attack Protection (TAP) helps you stay ahead of attackers with an innovative approach that detects, analyzes and blocks advanced threats before they reach your inbox. This includes ransomware and other advanced email threats delivered through malicious attachments and URLs. And zero-day threats, polymorphic malware, weaponized documents and phishing attacks. TAP provides adaptive controls to isolate the riskiest URL clicks. TAP also detects threats and risks in cloud apps, connecting email attacks related to credential theft or other attacks.

Sample Customers
Ferrari S.P.A., Axel Springer, Telefonica
Brinker Capital
Top Industries
No Data Available
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Financial Services Firm17%
Computer Software Company11%
Manufacturing Company8%
Insurance Company6%
Company Size
No Data Available
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Small Business18%
Midsize Enterprise8%
Large Enterprise73%
Buyer's Guide
Advanced Threat Protection (ATP)
March 2024
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Palo Alto Networks, ESET and others in Advanced Threat Protection (ATP). Updated: March 2024.
768,415 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Kaspersky Sandbox [EOL] doesn't meet the minimum requirements to be ranked in Advanced Threat Protection (ATP) while Proofpoint Targeted Attack Protection is ranked 23rd in Advanced Threat Protection (ATP). Kaspersky Sandbox [EOL] is rated 0.0, while Proofpoint Targeted Attack Protection is rated 7.0. On the other hand, the top reviewer of Proofpoint Targeted Attack Protection writes "Dynamic runtime engine and good protection, but needs better support and a single console". Kaspersky Sandbox [EOL] is most compared with , whereas Proofpoint Targeted Attack Protection is most compared with Microsoft Defender for Office 365, Avanan, IRONSCALES, Palo Alto Networks WildFire and Microsoft Defender for Identity.

See our list of best Advanced Threat Protection (ATP) vendors.

We monitor all Advanced Threat Protection (ATP) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.