Kaspersky Security for Mail Server vs Trustwave Secure Email Gateway comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Kaspersky Security for Mail Server and Trustwave Secure Email Gateway based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out in this report how the two Secure Email Gateway (SEG) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI.
To learn more, read our detailed Kaspersky Security for Mail Server vs. Trustwave Secure Email Gateway Report (Updated: March 2024).
768,578 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Aziz Moha
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"The integration rate is very high in Kaspersky, which is why most of our customers like it.""The most valuable feature of the solution stems from the fact that it is a highly reliable and dependable solution.""The most valuable feature is the straightforward setup.""You can install the plugins on the same machine hosting your exchange solution. It's a good complement for Sophos security, which scans the traffic before it reaches your mail service. Kaspersky is on the mail server itself while Sophos handles the incoming traffic. With both of them working together, we have the perfect solution for mail.""The most valuable features are the anti-phishing and anti-spam capabilities."

More Kaspersky Security for Mail Server Pros →

"I like that it doesn't hold emails for any reason; it sends out notifications to the user as well as administrators. So we have a clear vision on the clear side of what is being blocked and in time as well.""The product's most valuable features are spam protection and artificial intelligence."

More Trustwave Secure Email Gateway Pros →

Cons
"The solution is not 100 percent stable and that can use improvement.""The biggest problem in the solution is related to its license renewal since it is pretty hard in Kaspersky to find out the procedure to renew a license.""Kaspersky lacks in the area of customization, so simpler customization options need to be provided to users.""Encrypted email attachments are not being monitored by this solution, which is an area that they need to work on.""It would be great if Kaspersky could do what Sophos does for us. However, we love having these two different technologies doing the same thing. Sometimes Sophos has the patch to block a novel threat, but Kaspersky doesn't."

More Kaspersky Security for Mail Server Cons →

"There is room for improvement in GUI because it is a bit old-fashioned.""The technical support services and stability need improvement as well."

More Trustwave Secure Email Gateway Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "Price-wise, I would rate this product a four out of five. It could be a bit cheaper."
  • "The solution is not expensive."
  • "The solution offers one of the best prices possible to its users, making it even better than Barracuda. Kaspersky Security for Mail Server is ten times cheaper than Barracuda."
  • "My company makes annual payments towards the licensing costs solution."
  • More Kaspersky Security for Mail Server Pricing and Cost Advice →

  • "It is a cost-effective product."
  • "The pricing is in the middle. Compared to other products, it should be five out of ten, where one is cheap and ten is expensive."
  • More Trustwave Secure Email Gateway Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Secure Email Gateway (SEG) solutions are best for your needs.
    768,578 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Top Answer:The most valuable feature of the solution stems from the fact that it is a highly reliable and dependable solution.
    Top Answer:My company makes annual payments towards the licensing costs solution.
    Top Answer:The biggest problem in the solution is related to its license renewal since it is pretty hard in Kaspersky to find out the procedure to renew a license. The license renewal is an area that needs… more »
    Top Answer:I like that it doesn't hold emails for any reason; it sends out notifications to the user as well as administrators. So we have a clear vision on the clear side of what is being blocked and in time as… more »
    Top Answer:The pricing is in the middle. Compared to other products, it should be five out of ten, where one is cheap and ten is expensive.
    Top Answer:There is room for improvement in GUI because it is a bit old-fashioned. Moreover, it can add more advanced features compared to a competitor like Mimecast.
    Ranking
    Views
    307
    Comparisons
    242
    Reviews
    3
    Average Words per Review
    353
    Rating
    8.3
    Views
    10
    Comparisons
    8
    Reviews
    1
    Average Words per Review
    444
    Rating
    7.0
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    Trustwave SEG
    Learn More
    Overview

    Email is the number one vector used by cybercriminals to penetrate and attack enterprise IT systems.

    Kaspersky Security for Mail Server uses Next Generation technologies including advanced heuristics, machine learning and sandboxing to detect and protect against ransomware, spam, phishing, data loss and even unknown threats penetrating your IT systems through emails and malicious attachments.

    Protecting your email environment against spam, malware, phishing attacks, business email compromise, account takeover, ransomware and more is one of your top priorities. Trustwave Secure Email Gateway (SEG) multi-layered intelligence and detection engine performs deep analysis of your inbound email traffic, in real-time, to protect your users from cyber threats, enables you to integrate the workflow of your email content into business processes , while scrutinizing outbound email traffic to prevent your proprietary data, intellectual property, confidential documents and financial records from electronically leaving the building.

    Sample Customers
    Vimpel Com, Estrella Galicia, Krombacher
    Information Not Available
    Top Industries
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company14%
    University11%
    Financial Services Firm9%
    Construction Company8%
    No Data Available
    Company Size
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business31%
    Midsize Enterprise29%
    Large Enterprise40%
    No Data Available
    Buyer's Guide
    Kaspersky Security for Mail Server vs. Trustwave Secure Email Gateway
    March 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about Kaspersky Security for Mail Server vs. Trustwave Secure Email Gateway and other solutions. Updated: March 2024.
    768,578 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    Kaspersky Security for Mail Server is ranked 10th in Secure Email Gateway (SEG) with 5 reviews while Trustwave Secure Email Gateway is ranked 15th in Secure Email Gateway (SEG) with 2 reviews. Kaspersky Security for Mail Server is rated 8.2, while Trustwave Secure Email Gateway is rated 7.0. The top reviewer of Kaspersky Security for Mail Server writes "A stable product that offers a very high rate of integration to its users". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Trustwave Secure Email Gateway writes "Offers clear vision on the clear side of what is being blocked and easy to use but a bit old-fashioned GUI". Kaspersky Security for Mail Server is most compared with Fortinet FortiMail, Barracuda Email Security Gateway, Cisco Secure Email, Microsoft Exchange Online Protection (EOP) and Microsoft Defender for Office 365, whereas Trustwave Secure Email Gateway is most compared with Microsoft Exchange Online Protection (EOP) and Microsoft Defender for Office 365. See our Kaspersky Security for Mail Server vs. Trustwave Secure Email Gateway report.

    See our list of best Secure Email Gateway (SEG) vendors.

    We monitor all Secure Email Gateway (SEG) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.