We performed a comparison between Katalon Studio and OpenText Business Processing Testing based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Regression Testing Tools solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The functionality of the data is very good. You can upload and disperse data using the solution."
"We are now performing automated testing in 15 minutes, which were previously taking a long time when doing it manually."
"One of the features that I like is Object Recognition. It worked very well, and it allowed me to create a dynamic expert based on my requirements."
"I like the feature where you can define a model that represents your website and then reuse the components from the model. It makes creating more test cases easy."
"The most valuable feature is its automation security capabilities."
"Whenever I speak to the support team of Katalon Studio, I learn that some new features will be included in the product. It is a scalable product."
"The initial setup of Katalon Studio was easy."
"It is easy for a non-technical person to use and adopt."
"This solution is very helpful to me. I use it to execute my use cases without a manual interface."
"The solution is quite stable with SAP. It's nice. I use it extensively."
"I can say that in my company, we struggle a lot with iOS automation."
"The product’s regression testing time could be reduced."
"We would like to see improved integration with various reporting tools; this would make our testing data more complete."
"Currently, I'm the only one who can use it because I have a Mac. It is giving a hard time to my team members who are on Linux. My team members are using Linux, and Katalon doesn't support Linux very well. It keeps on crashing. It crashes and shuts down almost every time they save their work, so they are not able to use it. It should have good support for Linux. We don't know what the problem is. If the Katalon team can pick up this issue, it will be very helpful."
"Katalon lacks integration with other software, including integrating other languages like .NET and PHP."
"Katalon Studio's pricing is expensive."
"I've seen that our clients are not truly aware of the power behind Katalon."
"My recently-updated Katalon studio version hangs a lot and is not a stable version."
"There's only one thing that I think needs improvement. When I started off using this solution, I used the Google search engine to learn how to use the tool. I would also check with my colleagues who have a lot of knowledge about it. Selenium has fields of information available. If you click on that field there will be an explanation about how to use the tool. It will be very easier to understand it if Micro Focus included this feature. It is easy to find with the search button, but it would be a great help to the users who are new to this tool."
"The solution shouldn't be so tightly integrated with the ALM tool that they have. It should have its own base rather than the repository."
Earn 20 points
Katalon Studio is ranked 4th in Regression Testing Tools with 40 reviews while OpenText Business Processing Testing is ranked 36th in Functional Testing Tools. Katalon Studio is rated 7.8, while OpenText Business Processing Testing is rated 7.8. The top reviewer of Katalon Studio writes "Useful multiple technology platform, scalable, but usability could improve". On the other hand, the top reviewer of OpenText Business Processing Testing writes "Excellent usability, but the solution shouldn't be so tightly integrated with their ALM tool". Katalon Studio is most compared with Tricentis Tosca, Postman, OpenText UFT One, Appium and Testim, whereas OpenText Business Processing Testing is most compared with . See our Katalon Studio vs. OpenText Business Processing Testing report.
See our list of best Regression Testing Tools vendors.
We monitor all Regression Testing Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.