• Home
  • Cisco Vulnerability Management (formerly Kenna.VM) vs. SecurityScorecard

Cisco Vulnerability Management (formerly Kenna.VM) vs SecurityScorecard comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Download the complete report
Buyer's Guide
Risk-Based Vulnerability Management
April 2024
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Cisco Vulnerability Management (formerly Kenna.VM) and SecurityScorecard based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Tenable, Qualys, Rapid7 and others in Risk-Based Vulnerability Management.
To learn more, read our detailed Risk-Based Vulnerability Management Report (Updated: April 2024).
Download the complete report
768,246 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
AshishPaliwal
Offers contextual prioritization and risk-based remediation of vulnerability
Jai Prakash Sharma
A reasonably stable product that provides recommendations to improve the scores
This tool is a platform for monitoring and assessing the security posture of organizations and also helps to improve the posture by recommendations
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"The risk context of any vulnerability is a valuable feature."

More Cisco Vulnerability Management (formerly Kenna.VM) Pros →

"I rate the product's initial setup phase a nine on a scale of one to ten, where one is a difficult setup phase, and ten is an easy setup process.""The solution helps identify our environment's vulnerabilities.""One of its most effective features for risk identification is its enterprise-ready automation for third-party risk measurements.""With its automated approach, nothing is missed on the IPs your organization is related to."

More SecurityScorecard Pros →

Cons
"An improvement would be some sort of an integration with any GRC suite."

More Cisco Vulnerability Management (formerly Kenna.VM) Cons →

"The tool needs to have the ability to mitigate vulnerabilities with alternative solutions.""There could be more information in regards to solving problems like hints on what specifically to look for.""SecurityScorecard's technical team's response time is an area that my company expects to be made faster.""They could improve the process with a questionnaire module for the product."

More SecurityScorecard Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "I think the pricing is based on the number of endpoints, so it's more subscription-based."

    • More Cisco Vulnerability Management (formerly Kenna.VM) Pricing and Cost Advice →

  • "The pricing could be split into a lower-paid tier for smaller organizations and another higher tier for others with a more security-focused outlook. $1000 per month is more than some companies pay for their internet connections in total. UPDATE: they have a new 400$ a month tier for starters."
  • "Even though it's competitive, they offer flexible pricing structures."

    • More SecurityScorecard Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    See Which Vendors Are Best For You
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Risk-Based Vulnerability Management solutions are best for your needs.
    See Recommendations
    768,246 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    What do you like most about Kenna.VM?
    Top Answer:The risk context of any vulnerability is a valuable feature.
    What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Kenna.VM?
    Top Answer:I think the pricing is based on the number of endpoints, so it's more subscription-based. If you have 10 computers versus a million computers, obviously the pricing will change.
    What needs improvement with Kenna.VM?
    Top Answer:An improvement would be some sort of an integration with any GRC suite. There are a lot of GRC suites available, like Archer, MetricStream, Rsam, Protiviti, for example. So how would a solution like… more »
    What do you like most about SecurityScorecard?
    Top Answer:One of its most effective features for risk identification is its enterprise-ready automation for third-party risk measurements.
    Read all 4 answers   →
    What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for SecurityScorecard?
    Top Answer:Similar to Barracuda, SecurityScorecard's list price may appear high initially. Even though it's competitive, they offer flexible pricing structures.
    Read all 2 answers   →
    What needs improvement with SecurityScorecard?
    Top Answer:They could improve the process with a questionnaire module for the product. At present, we have to answer multiple questions for the suppliers manually. They could automate functionality to enhance… more »
    Read all 4 answers   →
    Ranking
    10th
    out of 37 in Risk-Based Vulnerability Management
    Views
    684
    Comparisons
    473
    Reviews
    1
    Average Words per Review
    498
    Rating
    8.0
    5th
    out of 36 in IT Vendor Risk Management
    Views
    2,190
    Comparisons
    1,250
    Reviews
    3
    Average Words per Review
    700
    Rating
    8.0
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    Kenna.VM, Kenna Security, Kenna, Kenna Security Platform
    Learn More
    Cisco
    SecurityScorecard
    Overview

    Cisco Vulnerability Management equips you with the contextual insight and threat intelligence needed to intercept the next exploit and respond with precision.

    Prioritization is no longer a dark art—it's data science. Advanced algorithms, combined with rich internal and external intel, offer recommended fixes that will lower risk in as few moves as possible.

    Track vulnerability fluctuations and forecast weaponization with up to 94% accuracy, giving you the chance to remediate high-risk vulnerabilities before bad actors can mount an attack.

    With more than 19 threat intelligence feeds at your fingertips, you gain a comprehensive view of emerging threats, shifting trends, and your own risk profile.

    A single source of data-verified truth aligns security and IT, eliminating friction and freeing up resources. And intuitive, simplified risk scores help you generate reports anyone can understand.

    Funded by world-class investors including Evolution Equity Partners, Silver Lake Partners, Sequoia Capital, GV, Riverwood Capital, and others, SecurityScorecard is the global leader in cybersecurity ratings with more than 12 million companies continuously rated. Founded in 2013 by security and risk experts Dr. Aleksandr Yampolskiy and Sam Kassoumeh, SecurityScorecard’s patented rating technology is used by over 25,000 organizations for enterprise risk management, third-party risk management, board reporting, due diligence, cyber insurance underwriting, and regulatory oversight. SecurityScorecard continues to make the world a safer place by transforming the way companies understand, improve and communicate cybersecurity risk to their boards, employees and vendors. Every organization has the universal right to their trusted and transparent Instant SecurityScorecard rating. For more information, visit securityscorecard.com or connect with us on LinkedIn.

    Sample Customers
    TransUnion
    TriNet, USAA, Zurich, Gilt Groupe, McGraw Hill Financial
    Top Industries
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company22%
    Financial Services Firm13%
    Insurance Company7%
    Retailer7%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company14%
    Financial Services Firm13%
    Educational Organization11%
    Manufacturing Company8%
    Company Size
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business13%
    Midsize Enterprise20%
    Large Enterprise67%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business19%
    Midsize Enterprise23%
    Large Enterprise57%
    Buyer's Guide
    Risk-Based Vulnerability Management
    April 2024
    Download Free Report
    Find out what your peers are saying about Tenable, Qualys, Rapid7 and others in Risk-Based Vulnerability Management. Updated: April 2024.
    DOWNLOAD NOW
    768,246 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    Cisco Vulnerability Management (formerly Kenna.VM) is ranked 10th in Risk-Based Vulnerability Management with 1 review while SecurityScorecard is ranked 5th in IT Vendor Risk Management with 4 reviews. Cisco Vulnerability Management (formerly Kenna.VM) is rated 8.0, while SecurityScorecard is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Cisco Vulnerability Management (formerly Kenna.VM) writes "Offers contextual prioritization and risk-based remediation of vulnerability". On the other hand, the top reviewer of SecurityScorecard writes "Easy-to-deploy product with good technical support services ". Cisco Vulnerability Management (formerly Kenna.VM) is most compared with Rapid7 InsightVM, Qualys VMDR, Tenable Security Center, Ivanti Neurons for RBVM and Skybox Security Suite, whereas SecurityScorecard is most compared with Bitsight Third-Party Risk Management, Recorded Future, RiskRecon, Tenable Nessus and Rapid7 InsightVM.

    We monitor all Risk-Based Vulnerability Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.