We performed a comparison between Cisco Vulnerability Management (formerly Kenna.VM) and RiskIQ Illuminate based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Tenable, Qualys, Rapid7 and others in Risk-Based Vulnerability Management."The risk context of any vulnerability is a valuable feature."
More Cisco Vulnerability Management (formerly Kenna.VM) Pros →
"The solution is stable with 12 years of established historical data."
"An improvement would be some sort of an integration with any GRC suite."
More Cisco Vulnerability Management (formerly Kenna.VM) Cons →
"A low-cost service to evaluate the risk score of a supply chain would be very helpful."
More Cisco Vulnerability Management (formerly Kenna.VM) Pricing and Cost Advice →
Earn 20 points
Cisco Vulnerability Management (formerly Kenna.VM) is ranked 10th in Risk-Based Vulnerability Management with 1 review while RiskIQ Illuminate is ranked 13th in Attack Surface Management (ASM). Cisco Vulnerability Management (formerly Kenna.VM) is rated 8.0, while RiskIQ Illuminate is rated 0.0. The top reviewer of Cisco Vulnerability Management (formerly Kenna.VM) writes "Offers contextual prioritization and risk-based remediation of vulnerability". On the other hand, the top reviewer of RiskIQ Illuminate writes "Able to discover unpatched servers, offers good stability, and scales very well". Cisco Vulnerability Management (formerly Kenna.VM) is most compared with Rapid7 InsightVM, Qualys VMDR, Tenable Security Center, Ivanti Neurons for RBVM and Skybox Security Suite, whereas RiskIQ Illuminate is most compared with Microsoft Defender External Attack Surface Management, ZeroFOX, Palo Alto Networks WildFire and Recorded Future.
We monitor all Risk-Based Vulnerability Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.