• Home
  • Cisco Vulnerability Management (formerly Kenna.VM) vs. Ivanti Neurons for RBVM

Cisco Vulnerability Management (formerly Kenna.VM) vs Ivanti Neurons for RBVM comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Download the complete report
Buyer's Guide
Risk-Based Vulnerability Management
April 2024
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Cisco Vulnerability Management (formerly Kenna.VM) and Ivanti Neurons for RBVM based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Tenable, Qualys, Rapid7 and others in Risk-Based Vulnerability Management.
To learn more, read our detailed Risk-Based Vulnerability Management Report (Updated: April 2024).
Download the complete report
767,847 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
AshishPaliwal
Offers contextual prioritization and risk-based remediation of vulnerability
Anonymous User
Useful for vulnerability management with many integrations
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"The risk context of any vulnerability is a valuable feature."

More Cisco Vulnerability Management (formerly Kenna.VM) Pros →

"Most of the features are similar to what other tools have, but the UIs are quite user friendly. A beginner could use it."

More Ivanti Neurons for RBVM Pros →

Cons
"An improvement would be some sort of an integration with any GRC suite."

More Cisco Vulnerability Management (formerly Kenna.VM) Cons →

"I would also like to see more integrations, plugins, and user-friendly automation, similar to the multiple integration scripts that Rapid7 has."

More Ivanti Neurons for RBVM Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "I think the pricing is based on the number of endpoints, so it's more subscription-based."

    • More Cisco Vulnerability Management (formerly Kenna.VM) Pricing and Cost Advice →

    Information Not Available
    report
    See Which Vendors Are Best For You
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Risk-Based Vulnerability Management solutions are best for your needs.
    See Recommendations
    767,847 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    What do you like most about Kenna.VM?
    Top Answer:The risk context of any vulnerability is a valuable feature.
    What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Kenna.VM?
    Top Answer:I think the pricing is based on the number of endpoints, so it's more subscription-based. If you have 10 computers versus a million computers, obviously the pricing will change.
    What needs improvement with Kenna.VM?
    Top Answer:An improvement would be some sort of an integration with any GRC suite. There are a lot of GRC suites available, like Archer, MetricStream, Rsam, Protiviti, for example. So how would a solution like… more »
    What do you like most about RiskSense?
    Top Answer:Most of the features are similar to what other tools have, but the UIs are quite user friendly. A beginner could use it.
    What needs improvement with RiskSense?
    Top Answer:They could add more widgets, similar to Rapid7 and InsightVM. I would also like to see more integrations, plugins, and user-friendly automation, similar to the multiple integration scripts that Rapid7… more »
    What is your primary use case for RiskSense?
    Top Answer:We use RiskSense for vulnerability management, and we have many integrations. The solution is deployed on cloud. We use this solution daily. There are more than 200 people using this solution in my… more »
    Ranking
    10th
    out of 37 in Risk-Based Vulnerability Management
    Views
    684
    Comparisons
    473
    Reviews
    1
    Average Words per Review
    498
    Rating
    8.0
    26th
    out of 110 in Vulnerability Management
    Views
    363
    Comparisons
    274
    Reviews
    1
    Average Words per Review
    202
    Rating
    9.0
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    Kenna.VM, Kenna Security, Kenna, Kenna Security Platform
    RiskSense
    Learn More
    Cisco
    Ivanti
    Overview

    Cisco Vulnerability Management equips you with the contextual insight and threat intelligence needed to intercept the next exploit and respond with precision.

    Prioritization is no longer a dark art—it's data science. Advanced algorithms, combined with rich internal and external intel, offer recommended fixes that will lower risk in as few moves as possible.

    Track vulnerability fluctuations and forecast weaponization with up to 94% accuracy, giving you the chance to remediate high-risk vulnerabilities before bad actors can mount an attack.

    With more than 19 threat intelligence feeds at your fingertips, you gain a comprehensive view of emerging threats, shifting trends, and your own risk profile.

    A single source of data-verified truth aligns security and IT, eliminating friction and freeing up resources. And intuitive, simplified risk scores help you generate reports anyone can understand.

    Evolve your vulnerability management strategy to a risk-based approach. Ivanti Neurons for RBVM enables you to prioritize the vulnerabilities that pose the most risk to better protect against ransomware and other cyber threats.
    Sample Customers
    TransUnion
    Care First, City of Alburquerque, Electric Company El Paso, State of Arizona, Washington Gas
    Top Industries
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company22%
    Financial Services Firm13%
    Insurance Company7%
    Retailer7%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company14%
    Healthcare Company10%
    Financial Services Firm9%
    Insurance Company7%
    Company Size
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business13%
    Midsize Enterprise21%
    Large Enterprise67%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business23%
    Midsize Enterprise14%
    Large Enterprise63%
    Buyer's Guide
    Risk-Based Vulnerability Management
    April 2024
    Download Free Report
    Find out what your peers are saying about Tenable, Qualys, Rapid7 and others in Risk-Based Vulnerability Management. Updated: April 2024.
    DOWNLOAD NOW
    767,847 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    Cisco Vulnerability Management (formerly Kenna.VM) is ranked 10th in Risk-Based Vulnerability Management with 1 review while Ivanti Neurons for RBVM is ranked 26th in Vulnerability Management with 1 review. Cisco Vulnerability Management (formerly Kenna.VM) is rated 8.0, while Ivanti Neurons for RBVM is rated 9.0. The top reviewer of Cisco Vulnerability Management (formerly Kenna.VM) writes "Offers contextual prioritization and risk-based remediation of vulnerability". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Ivanti Neurons for RBVM writes "Useful for vulnerability management with many integrations". Cisco Vulnerability Management (formerly Kenna.VM) is most compared with Qualys VMDR, Rapid7 InsightVM, Tenable Security Center, Skybox Security Suite and Brinqa, whereas Ivanti Neurons for RBVM is most compared with Qualys VMDR, Tenable Security Center, Rapid7 InsightVM, Tenable Nessus and Brinqa.

    We monitor all Risk-Based Vulnerability Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.