We performed a comparison between Cisco Vulnerability Management (formerly Kenna.VM) and ZeroNorth based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Tenable, Qualys, Rapid7 and others in Risk-Based Vulnerability Management.More Cisco Vulnerability Management (formerly Kenna.VM) Pricing and Cost Advice →
Earn 20 points
Cisco Vulnerability Management (formerly Kenna.VM) is ranked 10th in Risk-Based Vulnerability Management with 1 review while ZeroNorth is ranked 65th in Vulnerability Management. Cisco Vulnerability Management (formerly Kenna.VM) is rated 8.0, while ZeroNorth is rated 0.0. The top reviewer of Cisco Vulnerability Management (formerly Kenna.VM) writes "Offers contextual prioritization and risk-based remediation of vulnerability". On the other hand, Cisco Vulnerability Management (formerly Kenna.VM) is most compared with Qualys VMDR, Rapid7 InsightVM, Tenable Security Center, Ivanti Neurons for RBVM and Skybox Security Suite, whereas ZeroNorth is most compared with .
We monitor all Risk-Based Vulnerability Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.