KerioConnect vs Microsoft Exchange comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
GFI Logo
2,478 views|1,485 comparisons
50% willing to recommend
Microsoft Logo
5,455 views|4,726 comparisons
93% willing to recommend
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between KerioConnect and Microsoft Exchange based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out in this report how the two Email Applications solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI.
To learn more, read our detailed KerioConnect vs. Microsoft Exchange Report (Updated: March 2024).
768,578 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"We have contacted technical support a handful of times and received some assistance.""It's relatively simple to use.""The most valuable features are security and privacy because you installed it on your server, within your company premises, not in the cloud.""The user interface is good.""The most valuable features are its ease of use, excellent pricing, and it is platform agnostic.""Kerio Connect is secure, flexible, and easy to control from the user interface. It has many security features able to be controlled from one place, such as anti-spam. I have found it very convenient. Additionally, you can analyze log files and share folders which is helpful.""What I like most about Kerio Connect is that it supports ActiveSync, and that is its most critical feature. The solution is also a nice, simple, robust, and stable mail server."

More KerioConnect Pros →

"It is a product that is simple to manage, and easy to use.""This solution handles all of our primary functionality including email, message delivery, message archiving and calendars.""The initial setup was straightforward and fast.""We have found it to be a stable solution. It is scalable and easy to install.""The backup and archiving features are valuable, it is user friendly too.""Now, we manage to serve almost 99% of the information.""The functionality on the user side is quite good. Exchange provides an excellent platform for collaboration between users.""It is a very stable tool...It is a very scalable tool."

More Microsoft Exchange Pros →

Cons
"You cannot integrate with other services like Google Docs, Google Assistant, Google Calendar, etc.""I would like to see better support from their support team.""It could be simpler to use and install, but I still wouldn't use it because there isn't a compelling use case.""Having a native Outlook map integration would make Kerio Connect better.""The search and archiving documentation capabilities need to be stronger.""Most of our clients use Outlook and Kerio Connect. Occasionally, Kerio can be a bit slow. They could make it faster to get onto the web interface without so much load time. It's just slow with Outlook, however, for some reason.""The solution could improve the redundancy because we only have one copy of the Kerio Connect server on our hardware. The next step for us is to move to the cloud and if Kerio does not have a cloud version available they should release one"

More KerioConnect Cons →

"In the version we have, I would like to see better communication between the end device and the Exchange server.""One thing for improvement would be to have an offline version of Exchange available for use if our connection goes down.""They could continue to improve the consolidation and integration of mailbox services to make them more flexible, easier to deploy, and more manageable.""Microsoft Exchange's customer support could be faster and more knowledgeable.""From a security perspective, Microsft Exchange can be improved. All that needs to be added is security, but that's an internal hierarchical problem from the product itself and not the end-users.""It's not always the finest solution in terms of integration with products that are not from Microsoft. It integrates very well with Microsoft products but not with third-party products.""It doesn't work very well on a virtual machine. We had to move it around. There are also issues when you try to move it between computers.""We would prefer to be able to manage the solution on the cloud."

More Microsoft Exchange Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "The pricing is about $3 per mailbox per month."
  • "The price of Kerio Connect is better when comparing it to others solutions."
  • More KerioConnect Pricing and Cost Advice →

  • "They are flexible when it comes to pricing, unlike most of the other vendors I have dealt with."
  • "It's working very well. There is no problem, but the price is not the best."
  • "Its price is okay."
  • "It's a little bit expensive."
  • "Its price is very affordable, and basically, it is the standard of the industry. We have the Exchange 365 subscription, which includes the usage of Exchange Online. I don't know the specific cost, but it is the retail price of Microsoft 365 E3 licenses. Microsoft's licensing is not very easy to understand. Microsoft changes rules every other day, which makes it difficult for us to understand the licensing not only for Exchange but also for other products. It can sometimes be really complex to understand what you need to have in order to comply with Microsoft licensing."
  • "Microsoft doesn't have a unit price, it's based on the quantity, and they offer great discounts."
  • "We are currently using enterprise licenses for the solution. They are different pricing models available. There are individual, cloud-based, and enterprise licenses all with different pricing models. The larger the number of users, the lesser the price. For small to medium companies like us, we feel it is expensive."
  • "Its price is fair."
  • More Microsoft Exchange Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Email Applications solutions are best for your needs.
    768,578 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Top Answer:The search and archiving documentation capabilities need to be stronger. The user documentation is ridiculous. The connectivity with CRM is a significant issue here. We don't have a great way of… more »
    Top Answer:It's a corporate email. All of our corporate emails go through it.
    Top Answer:Zimbra is a free, open source collaborative software suite. The features I like best are the ease of integration and the email, calendar, and collaboration server with web interface. In addition, I… more »
    Top Answer:The initial setup was straightforward and fast.
    Top Answer:Compared to the other options in the market, the licensing costs attached to Microsoft Exchange seem reasonable.
    Ranking
    9th
    out of 24 in Email Applications
    Views
    2,478
    Comparisons
    1,485
    Reviews
    1
    Average Words per Review
    1,076
    Rating
    5.0
    3rd
    out of 24 in Email Applications
    Views
    5,455
    Comparisons
    4,726
    Reviews
    35
    Average Words per Review
    368
    Rating
    8.6
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    Exchange, MS Exchange
    Learn More
    Overview

    Kerio Connect, a messaging and collaboration solution, meets the needs of small and mid-sized businesses while offering a robust feature lineup. Business users enjoy support for their favorite email client and easy web-based access. Kerio Connect is highly stable—so you can focus on business rather than unexpected downtime and recovery.

    Built to deliver the enterprise-grade security and reliability that businesses require, Microsoft Exchange provides email, calendar and contacts on your PC, phone and web browser.
    Sample Customers
    Southern Tier Brewing Company, Innotta, Baustoff + Metall, Hamifleurs, Chanson TV, Ryman Stationery
    Paderborn-Lippstadt Airport, Scitec Nutrition, British Airways, InnoGames, Osteology Foundation, Franz Haniel & Cie. GmbH, NTC Contracting
    Top Industries
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company17%
    Comms Service Provider12%
    Government10%
    Educational Organization8%
    REVIEWERS
    Financial Services Firm15%
    Computer Software Company13%
    Manufacturing Company13%
    Energy/Utilities Company9%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company15%
    Comms Service Provider11%
    Government10%
    Financial Services Firm9%
    Company Size
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business75%
    Midsize Enterprise25%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business46%
    Midsize Enterprise15%
    Large Enterprise39%
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business36%
    Midsize Enterprise25%
    Large Enterprise39%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business31%
    Midsize Enterprise20%
    Large Enterprise50%
    Buyer's Guide
    KerioConnect vs. Microsoft Exchange
    March 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about KerioConnect vs. Microsoft Exchange and other solutions. Updated: March 2024.
    768,578 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    KerioConnect is ranked 9th in Email Applications with 7 reviews while Microsoft Exchange is ranked 3rd in Email Applications with 78 reviews. KerioConnect is rated 6.2, while Microsoft Exchange is rated 8.4. The top reviewer of KerioConnect writes "Lightweight, simple, and robust; easy to maintain and doesn't require a lot of system resources to run". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Microsoft Exchange writes "Very stable with an easy-to-use email management system". KerioConnect is most compared with Zimbra Collaboration, IceWarp, Microsoft Exchange Online, Google Workspace and Open-Xchange, whereas Microsoft Exchange is most compared with Zimbra Collaboration, HCL Domino, Open-Xchange, HCL Notes and IceWarp. See our KerioConnect vs. Microsoft Exchange report.

    See our list of best Email Applications vendors.

    We monitor all Email Applications reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.