We performed a comparison between KiSSFLOW and Nintex Process Platform based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Business Process Management (BPM) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The best thing is the no-code part. Even a person without experience with the coding language can easily understand and build the processes."
"The most valuable feature is the performance."
"The best thing about KiSSFLOW is that we can do virtual approvals."
"The most valuable feature is APIs. Its integrations are very flexible, allowing developers to connect multiple applications like DocuSign, Salesforce, OpenText, and SEB."
"The user interface is very, very good."
"I work in HR and am fond of automation. I like the tool's email automation and integration with Outlook."
"Kissflow has reduced the bottleneck around getting approval for certain items in the company."
"The support team responds fast."
"The solution has helped us to automate our business processes, our approval systems, and automation for quickly developing on SharePoint on-prem and SharePoint online."
"We were able to meet all of the requirements for functionality that were specified, and we did not experience challenges where we had to compromise on functionality."
"It leverages the out-of-the-box SharePoint back-end. This means that you don’t need to install or deploy additional infrastructure to support Nintex Workflow, unlike some of its competitors."
"K2 is reasonably priced."
"The latest version of Nintex has many features. We have a clear roadmap and the necessary application to integrate it into our platform."
"I like the feature of getting an email for a workflow error, then I do not have to go through every instance."
"With an extensive list of integrations with LOB data, your workflows can extend far beyond SharePoint, driving adoption of SharePoint."
"The workflow engine of K2 is its main strength. Its workflow engine is probably one of the best, and that's the reason why Nintex bought K2. It can clearly handle any complex process or scenario. K2 is almost low-code. It is a no-code or low-code solution. You don't have to read a whole lot of code. It is pretty much GUI based. Their support is also excellent. The biggest advantage of K2 is SmartObjects, which allow you to separate the data from the application. It is a standalone application that allows you to build a data source from different places, which a lot of other applications also do. It is called SmartObjects technology, which is pretty powerful. If I have data from different applications, such as JD and ServiceNow, I can just create a SmartObject based on a data source and use it. I have some forms that have six, seven, or eight applications in a single form with data from different places."
"If Kissflow can help users to be able to organize the company manuals and information, the blogs, and everything into one resource, that would be awesome."
"They should increase their marketplace with existing tools so that connections are directly through connectors instead of API integrations."
"When there are multiple steps or if there's a disconnect when creating the ticket, it could be a problem for the user."
"Some of the tool's fields only accept certain types of text. The input fields are inflexible."
"There is a lag in the delay between API calls."
"The UI, though is pretty friendly and easy to use, can be improved in some aspects."
"In future releases, it would be interesting to have a repository or portal within KiSSFLOW where users can interact with the KiSSFLOW community."
"The integration between forms should be made easier."
"Bring all features available from the on-premise product into the cloud version and the workflow error reporting."
"The management server and the admin page where you can manage processes need improvement."
"Built-in reporting on-prem is limited and clunky at best."
"The solution is a bit too expensive. It could be cheaper."
"K2's support for DevOp team corporations is weak."
"Nintex seems to be very server intensive. It is one of the reasons that we are moving to a different product on the SharePoint 2016 platform."
"It is very flexible because you can design your own main forms, but if there were some templates according to your market, it would be more useful for a new customer. That would make K2 more user friendly and easier to use."
"The tool lacks to offer support for the Arabic language, and it needs consideration."
KiSSFLOW is ranked 10th in Business Process Management (BPM) with 12 reviews while Nintex Process Platform is ranked 9th in Business Process Management (BPM) with 21 reviews. KiSSFLOW is rated 8.6, while Nintex Process Platform is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of KiSSFLOW writes "The tool is intuitive to use and, through automation, has been a real time-saver". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Nintex Process Platform writes "Offers good integration capabilities and easy to learn and good stability". KiSSFLOW is most compared with Microsoft Power Apps, Camunda, ServiceNow, OutSystems and Appian, whereas Nintex Process Platform is most compared with Camunda, IBM BPM, Appian, Pega BPM and Newgen OmniFlow. See our KiSSFLOW vs. Nintex Process Platform report.
See our list of best Business Process Management (BPM) vendors.
We monitor all Business Process Management (BPM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
