We performed a comparison between KiSSFLOW and Oracle Planning and Budgeting Cloud based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Business Performance Management solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The support team responds fast."
"The flexibility and speed in modifying and creating processes are great features. If we have a process in mind, we can usually create it within ten minutes."
"The best thing about Kissflow is its user-friendliness."
"Kissflow is intuitive and easy to use, and I haven't faced any errors using the solution so far."
"The best thing about KiSSFLOW is that we can do virtual approvals."
"Kissflow has reduced the bottleneck around getting approval for certain items in the company."
"The best thing is the no-code part. Even a person without experience with the coding language can easily understand and build the processes."
"The user interface is very, very good."
"The most valuable features of Oracle Planning and Budgeting Cloud are the many capabilities it provides."
"The product has a direct plugin to Microsoft Excel."
"Once you do the budget in Oracle ERP, you can upload it, but it's easier to create and manage budgets in the Oracle budgeting tool itself. For example, if you have a shortfall in the budget, it's easier to manage that and the forms, too, especially if you also have Oracle Forms Management. You can get the forms from somewhere and then transform those forms into budget heads."
"We previously used Oracle EDS, and when comparing it to this solution, this solution has a much better interface. There are lots of advantages of the new solutions. Having it on the cloud, we are able to forget about keeping them updated or taking care of the database. We have minimal maintenance."
"The workforce, the cube database, is the most valuable feature where you do planning for your headcounts."
"The most valuable feature of Oracle Planning and Budgeting Cloud is ad hoc reporting."
"The tool improves the organizational budgeting process in several ways. One significant aspect is the extensionable functionality it offers. To illustrate, consider a scenario where a company has factories in Mexico producing Volkswagen and Kentucky producing Ford."
"The most valuable feature is the data integration in Oracle Planning and Budgeting Cloud."
"The integration between forms should be made easier."
"Some of the tool's fields only accept certain types of text. The input fields are inflexible."
"There is room for improvement in terms of stability."
"When there are multiple steps or if there's a disconnect when creating the ticket, it could be a problem for the user."
"In future releases, it would be interesting to have a repository or portal within KiSSFLOW where users can interact with the KiSSFLOW community."
"They should increase their marketplace with existing tools so that connections are directly through connectors instead of API integrations."
"One area where I believe Kissflow can be improved is customization."
"If Kissflow can help users to be able to organize the company manuals and information, the blogs, and everything into one resource, that would be awesome."
"There is middleware that we need to purchase for our use case that should be provided in Oracle Planning and Budgeting Cloud. We should not have to purchase the additional solution and the integration should be seamless."
"One potential improvement would be a more visual workflow, as the current method using a tax list is not as effective."
"Oracle Planning and Budgeting Cloud could improve by having better integration with some other modules that we would add to this solution."
"The FR recording studio that is used to build reports is clunky and awful to use. This could be improved a lot. The solution does have problems and limitations."
"Oracle Planning and Budgeting Cloud could improve. There are times when the forms are slow in saving and calculating."
"Some of the things in this product are just too cumbersome and we don't need them and they make it harder to do certain things, or certain things have to have more specific names or descriptions."
"For HR, the workforce planning out of the box is complicated. For most users, it's not easy, and it requires a learning curve. It's not very user-friendly. It can be improved."
"The tool's interface is outdated. However, OneStream is easier to navigate."
More Oracle Planning and Budgeting Cloud Pricing and Cost Advice →
KiSSFLOW is ranked 5th in Business Performance Management with 12 reviews while Oracle Planning and Budgeting Cloud is ranked 3rd in Business Performance Management with 16 reviews. KiSSFLOW is rated 8.6, while Oracle Planning and Budgeting Cloud is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of KiSSFLOW writes "The tool is intuitive to use and, through automation, has been a real time-saver". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Oracle Planning and Budgeting Cloud writes "Eliminates the need for users to sift through irrelevant options". KiSSFLOW is most compared with Microsoft Power Apps, Camunda, ServiceNow, Nintex Process Platform and OutSystems, whereas Oracle Planning and Budgeting Cloud is most compared with Oracle HFM, Anaplan, Oracle Hyperion, IBM Planning Analytics and IBM Cognos. See our KiSSFLOW vs. Oracle Planning and Budgeting Cloud report.
See our list of best Business Performance Management vendors.
We monitor all Business Performance Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.