Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Veracode Logo
65,994 views|35,731 comparisons
Kiuwan Logo
5,257 views|3,997 comparisons
Seeker Logo
102 views|33 comparisons
Top Review
Find out what your peers are saying about Veracode, PortSwigger, Checkmarx and others in Application Security Testing (AST). Updated: September 2021.
536,244 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pricing and Cost Advice
"For the value we get out of it, coupled with the live defect review sessions, we find it an effective value for the money. We are a larger organization.""I don't really know about the pricing, but I'd say it's worth whatever Veracode is charging, because the solution is that good.""Veracode's price is high. I would like them to better optimize their pricing.""If I compare the pricing with other software tools, then it is quite competitive. Whatever the price is, they have always given us a good discount.""Veracode is expensive. Some of its products are expensive. I don't think it's way more expensive than its competitors. The dynamic is definitely worth it, as I think it's cheaper than the competitors. The static scan is a little bit more expensive, around 20 percent more expensive. The manual pen test is more expensive, but it is an expensive service because it's a manual pen test and we also do retests. I don't think it is way more expensive than the competitors, but it's about 15 to 20 percent more expensive.""We use this product per project rather than per developer... Your development model will really determine what the best fit is for you in terms of licensing, because of the project-based licensing. If you do a few projects, that's more attractive. If you have a large number of developers, that would also make the product a little more attractive.""The pricing is really fair compared to a lot of other tools on the market.""It is very reasonably priced compared to what we were paying our previous vendor. For the same price, we are getting much more value and reducing our AppSec costs from 40 to 50 percent."

More Veracode Pricing and Cost Advice »

"It follows a subscription model. I think the price is somewhere in the middle."

More Kiuwan Pricing and Cost Advice »

Information Not Available
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Security Testing (AST) solutions are best for your needs.
536,244 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Questions from the Community
Top Answer: Good static analysis and dynamic analysis.
Top Answer: Veracode is very, very expensive, one of the most expensive security scanning tools available. We pay an annual license… more »
Top Answer: The solution has issues with scanning. It tries to decode the binaries that we are trying to scan. It decodes the… more »
Top Answer: I like that it provides a detailed report that lets you know the risk index and the vulnerability.
Top Answer: It follows a subscription model. I think the price is somewhere in the middle.
Top Answer: The integration process could be improved. It'll also help if it could generate reports automatically. But I'm not sure… more »
Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons
Learn More
Overview

Veracode covers all your Application Security needs in one solution through a combination of five analysis types; static analysis, dynamic analysis, software composition analysis, interactive application security testing, and penetration testing. Unlike on-premise solutions that are hard to scale and focused on finding rather than fixing, Veracode comprises a unique combination of SaaS technology and on-demand expertise that enables DevSecOps through integration with your pipeline, and empowers developers to find and fix security defects.

Software analytics technology with a breadth of third party integrations that takes into account the wealth of applications your teams are currently using.

We facilitate and encourage work between unlocalized teams. We understand the complexity of working on multi technology environments, constantly striving to increase the number of programming languages and technologies we support.

Seeker®, interactive application security testing (IAST) solution, gives you unparalleled visibility into your modern web, cloud based and microservices based app security posture. It automatically verifies, prioritizes and reports on critical vulnerabilities in real time. It identifies vulnerability trends against compliance standards (e.g., OWASP Top 10, PCI DSS, GDPR, CAPEC, and CWE/SANS Top 25). Seeker enables security teams to identify and track sensitive data to ensure that it is handled securely and not stored in log files or databases with weak or no encryption. Seeker’s seamless integration into CI/CD workflows enables fast interactive application security testing at DevOps speed.
Offer
Keep your software secure

Application security starts with secure code. Find out more about the benefits of using Veracode to keep your software secure throughout the development lifecycle.

Learn more about Kiuwan
Learn more about Seeker
Sample Customers
State of Missouri, Rekner
DHL, BNP Paribas, Zurich, AXA, Ernst & Young, KFC, Santander, Latam, Ferrovial
El Al Airlines and Société Française du Radiotelephone
Top Industries
REVIEWERS
Financial Services Firm31%
Computer Software Company10%
Insurance Company10%
Consumer Goods Company7%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company30%
Comms Service Provider16%
Financial Services Firm10%
Manufacturing Company6%
REVIEWERS
Legal Firm33%
Computer Software Company22%
Non Tech Company11%
Wireless Company11%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company30%
Comms Service Provider25%
Financial Services Firm13%
Insurance Company5%
No Data Available
Company Size
REVIEWERS
Small Business22%
Midsize Enterprise25%
Large Enterprise53%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Small Business23%
Midsize Enterprise28%
Large Enterprise49%
REVIEWERS
Small Business67%
Midsize Enterprise17%
Large Enterprise17%
No Data Available
Find out what your peers are saying about Veracode, PortSwigger, Checkmarx and others in Application Security Testing (AST). Updated: September 2021.
536,244 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Kiuwan is ranked 13th in Application Security Testing (AST) with 4 reviews while Seeker is ranked 31st in Application Security Testing (AST). Kiuwan is rated 8.0, while Seeker is rated 0.0. The top reviewer of Kiuwan writes "Scalable with good remediation capabilities and good stabilty". On the other hand, Kiuwan is most compared with SonarQube, Micro Focus Fortify on Demand, Checkmarx, WhiteSource and CAST Application Intelligence Platform, whereas Seeker is most compared with .

See our list of best Application Security Testing (AST) vendors.

We monitor all Application Security Testing (AST) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.