Kiuwan vs Tenable.io Web Application Scanning comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Kiuwan and Tenable.io Web Application Scanning based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out in this report how the two Application Security Tools solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI.
To learn more, read our detailed Kiuwan vs. Tenable.io Web Application Scanning Report (Updated: March 2024).
765,386 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"The feature that I have found the most valuable in Kiuwan is the speed of scanning. Compared to other SaaS tools I have used, Kiuwan is much quicker in performing scans. I have not yet used it on a large code base, but from what I have experienced, it is efficient and accurate. Additionally, I have used it both manually and in an automated pipeline, and both methods have been effective. The speed of scanning is what makes it valuable to me.""The most valuable feature is the time to resolution, where it tells you how long it is going to take to get to a zero-base or a five-star security rating.""We are using this solution to increase the quality of our software and to test the vulnerabilities in our tools before the customers find them.""I like that it provides a detailed report that lets you know the risk index and the vulnerability.""I like that I can scan the code without sending it to the Kiuwan cloud. I can do it locally on my device. When the local analyzer finishes, the results display on the dashboard in the cloud. It's essential for security purposes to be able to scan my code locally.""I find it immensely helpful because it's not just about generating code; it's about ensuring efficiency in the execution.""Lifecycle features, because they permit us to show non-technical people the risk and costs hidden into the code due to bad programming practices.""Software analytics for a lot of different languages including ABAP."

More Kiuwan Pros →

"Our customers adopt this solution because of the replication testing and the vulnerability assessment it can do. It is a multi-faceted product.""The solution's instant reports feature is the most effective for detecting threats.""The most effective feature of the product is the ability to scan the entire environment.""The solution is stable.""It collects the vulnerabilities on the hostnames and sends them to the Tenable.io cloud. Tenable has its own cloud where Tenable.io is running, but there are many connectors to other cloud solutions. Tenable can do vulnerability scanning for other cloud managers such as Azure, Amazon, and so on.""It is fully automated.""The initial setup is straightforward.""The most valuable features of Tenable.io Web Application Scanning are the integration into specific use cases and scanning. All of the features of the solution are useful."

More Tenable.io Web Application Scanning Pros →

Cons
"The development-to-delivery phase.""Integration of the programming tools could be improved.""DIfferent languages, such Spanish, Portuguese, and so on.""The integration process could be improved. It'll also help if it could generate reports automatically. But I'm not sure about the effectiveness of the reports. This is because, in our last project, we still found some key issues that weren't captured by the Kiuwan report.""Perhaps more languages supported.""The product's UI has certain shortcomings, where improvements are required.""I would like to see better integration with Azure DevOps in the next release of this solution.""The configuration hasn't been that good."

More Kiuwan Cons →

"Tenable.io Web Application Scanning could improve by offering faster fuzzing.""Tenable.io Web Application Scanning is not very user-friendly and you need a lot of information to get proper reports. The tool's support is not very responsive.""The platform's technical support services could be better.""The reporting has a very limited customization capability.""The solution's dashboards could be improved and made more user-friendly.""It would be great if there were a dashboard that is more user-friendly.""They have a general dashboard for web application scanning, but the dashboards and reporting can be improved. They probably have some features in their roadmap.""The report customization needs to be better."

More Tenable.io Web Application Scanning Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "Check with your account manager."
  • "Nothing special. It's a very fair model."
  • "I recommend contacting a sales person who will create the best plan payment plan for you, as we did."
  • "This solution is cheaper than other tools."
  • "It follows a subscription model. I think the price is somewhere in the middle."
  • "Kiuwan is an open-source solution and free to use."
  • "The price of Kiuwan is lower than that of other tools on the market."
  • More Kiuwan Pricing and Cost Advice →

  • "The pricing is okay."
  • "It follows the same licensing scheme as Tenable.io and Tenable. sc."
  • "The price of the solution is reasonable compared to the competitors. The license cost is based on the number of users and the annual usage."
  • "Tenable.io Web Application Scanning is expensive for small businesses."
  • "The application is extremely affordable. There are no additional costs involved with licensing. We switched to Tenable.io Web Application Scanning from other solutions due to pricing."
  • "I rate the product's pricing a four out of ten."
  • More Tenable.io Web Application Scanning Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Security Tools solutions are best for your needs.
    765,386 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Top Answer:The most valuable feature of the solution stems from the fact that it is quick when processing and giving an output or generating a report.
    Top Answer:I'm not entirely sure about the price and business aspects, but I assume Checkmarx might be less expensive. I think Checkmarx might offer more affordable options, especially in its smaller business… more »
    Top Answer:Kiuwan can improve its UI a little more. The user experience can be made better. Kiuwan offers a user interface that is similar to the one offered by Windows 7 or Windows 98, which I saw when I ran… more »
    Top Answer:The most effective feature of the product is the ability to scan the entire environment.
    Top Answer:The platform's technical support services could be better.
    Top Answer:Implementing Tenable.io Web Application Scanning has been beneficial in identifying numerous vulnerabilities within application code. I rate its scanning capabilities in terms of user-friendliness an… more »
    Ranking
    Views
    2,149
    Comparisons
    1,748
    Reviews
    6
    Average Words per Review
    570
    Rating
    8.0
    Views
    3,823
    Comparisons
    2,964
    Reviews
    9
    Average Words per Review
    322
    Rating
    7.6
    Comparisons
    Learn More
    Overview

    Software analytics technology with a breadth of third party integrations that takes into account the wealth of applications your teams are currently using.

    We facilitate and encourage work between unlocalized teams. We understand the complexity of working on multi technology environments, constantly striving to increase the number of programming languages and technologies we support.

    Tenable.io Web Application Scanning safely, accurately and automatically scans your web applications, providing deep visibility into vulnerabilities and valuable context to prioritize remediation.

    Sample Customers
    DHL, BNP Paribas, Zurich, AXA, Ernst & Young, KFC, Santander, Latam, Ferrovial
    IMDEX
    Top Industries
    REVIEWERS
    Legal Firm33%
    Computer Software Company22%
    Non Tech Company11%
    Wireless Company11%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Financial Services Firm17%
    Computer Software Company13%
    Comms Service Provider13%
    Construction Company6%
    REVIEWERS
    Computer Software Company25%
    Security Firm17%
    Educational Organization17%
    University8%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company14%
    Financial Services Firm12%
    Government11%
    Manufacturing Company7%
    Company Size
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business60%
    Midsize Enterprise16%
    Large Enterprise24%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business22%
    Midsize Enterprise17%
    Large Enterprise61%
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business40%
    Midsize Enterprise20%
    Large Enterprise40%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business20%
    Midsize Enterprise15%
    Large Enterprise64%
    Buyer's Guide
    Kiuwan vs. Tenable.io Web Application Scanning
    March 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about Kiuwan vs. Tenable.io Web Application Scanning and other solutions. Updated: March 2024.
    765,386 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    Kiuwan is ranked 21st in Application Security Tools with 23 reviews while Tenable.io Web Application Scanning is ranked 24th in Application Security Tools with 14 reviews. Kiuwan is rated 8.6, while Tenable.io Web Application Scanning is rated 7.6. The top reviewer of Kiuwan writes "Though a stable tool, the UI needs improvement". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Tenable.io Web Application Scanning writes "Highly Recommended Solution with Latest Scanning Methods". Kiuwan is most compared with SonarQube, Checkmarx, Fortify on Demand, Veracode and Snyk, whereas Tenable.io Web Application Scanning is most compared with Acunetix, SonarQube, Qualys Web Application Scanning, PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional and Fortify on Demand. See our Kiuwan vs. Tenable.io Web Application Scanning report.

    See our list of best Application Security Tools vendors.

    We monitor all Application Security Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.