Compare Kiuwan vs. Veracode

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Kiuwan Logo
6,594 views|4,457 comparisons
Veracode Logo
69,050 views|36,935 comparisons
Most Helpful Review
Find out what your peers are saying about Kiuwan vs. Veracode and other solutions. Updated: September 2020.
441,672 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros
"One of the features that I feel is groundbreaking, that I would like to see expanded on, is the IAS feature: The Interactive Application Security Testing module that gets loaded onto an application on a server, for more in-depth, granular findings. I think that is really neat. I haven't seen a lot of competitors doing that.""The most important feature is that it's a web-based graphical user interface. That is a great addition. Also, the ability to schedule scans is great.""Their technical support has been very active. If I have an issue, I can reach out to them and get an answer pretty quick.""We are able to create a report which shows the PCI DSS scoring and share it with the application teams. Then, they can correlate and see exactly what they need to fix, and why.""The automated approach to these repetitive discovery attempts would take days to do manually and therefore it helps reduce the time needed to do an assessment.""The vulnerability scanning option for analyzing the security loopholes on the websites is the most valuable feature of this solution.""Our developers can run the attacks directly from their environments, desktops.""It can operate both as a standalone and it can be integrated with other applications, which makes it a very versatile solution to have."

More Acunetix Vulnerability Scanner Pros »

"I've found the reporting features the most helpful.""We are using this solution to increase the quality of our software and to test the vulnerabilities in our tools before the customers find them.""The most valuable feature is the time to resolution, where it tells you how long it is going to take to get to a zero-base or a five-star security rating.""The solution has a continuous integration process."

More Kiuwan Pros »

"One of the valuable features is that it gives us the option of static scanning. Most tools of this type are centered around dynamic scanning. Having a static scan is very important.""It has an easy-to-use interface.""We are using the Veracode tools to expose the engineers to the security vulnerabilities that were introduced with the new features, i.e. a lot faster or sooner in the development life cycle.""The most valuable feature comes from the fact that it is cloud-based, and I can scale up without having to worry about any other infrastructure needs.""I have used this solution in multiple projects for vulnerability testing and finding security leaks within the code.""We used it for performing security checks. We have many Java applications and Android applications. Essentially it was used for checking the security validations for compliance purposes.""Veracode is a valuable tool in our secure SDLC process.""Integrations into our developer's IDE (Greenlight) and the DevOps Pipeline SAST / SourceClear Integrations has particularly increased our time to market and confidence."

More Veracode Pros »

Cons
"Integration into other tools is very limited for Acunetix. While we're trying to incorporate a CI/CD process where we're integrating with JIRA and we're integrating with Jenkins and Chef, it becomes problematic. Other tools give you a high integration capability to connect into different solutions that you may already have, like JIRA.""It should be easier to recreate something manually, with the manual tool, because Acunetix is an automatic tool. If it finds something, it should be easier to manually replicate it. Sometimes you don't get the raw data from the input and output, so that could be improved.""You can't actually change your password after you've set it unless you go back into the administration account and you change it there. Thus, if you're locked out and don't remember your password, that's a thing.""We have had issues during upgrades where their scans worked on some apps better with previous versions. Then, we had to work with their tech support, who were great, to get it fixed for the next version.""It would be nice to have a feature to "retest" only a single vulnerability that the customer reports as patched, and delete it from the next scans since it has already been patched.""In terms of what needs improvement, the way the licensing model is currently is not very convenient for us because initially, when we bought it, the licensing model was very flexible, but now it restricts us.""Tools that would allow us to work more efficiently with the mobile environment, with Android and iOS.""When monitoring the traffic we always have issues with the bandwidth consumption and the throttling of traffic."

More Acunetix Vulnerability Scanner Cons »

"The next release should include more flexibility in the reporting.""I would like to see better integration with the Visual Studio and Eclipse IDEs.""I would like to see better integration with Azure DevOps in the next release of this solution.""Integration of the programming tools could be improved."

More Kiuwan Cons »

"We would like a way to mark entire modules as "safe." The lack of this feature hasn't stopped us previously, it just makes our task more tedious at times. That kind of feature would save us time.""Veracode should make it easier to navigate between the solutions that they offer, i.e. between dynamic, static, and the source code analysis.""I would like to see expanded coverage for supporting more platforms, frameworks, and languages.""Ideally, I would like better reporting that gives me a more concise and accurate description of what my pain points are, and how to get to them.""One of the things that we have from a reporting point of view, is that we would love to see a graphical report. If you look through a report for something that has come back from Veracode, it takes a whole lot of time to just go through all the pages of the code to figure out exactly what it says. We know certain areas don’t have the greatest security features but those are usually minor and we don’t want to see those types of notifications.""It needs better controls to include/exclude specific sections when creating a report that can be shared externally with customers and prospects.""Improve Mobile Application Dynamic Scanning DAST - .ipa and .apk""I think for us the biggest improvement would be to have an indicator when there's something wrong with a scan."

More Veracode Cons »

Pricing and Cost Advice
"When we looked at all other vendors and what they were asking for, to provide a third of what Acunetix was capable of doing, it was an easy decision... But now that it's coming to a cost where it's line with market value, it becomes more of a competition... Acunetix is raising the cost of licensing. It's 3.5 times what we were initially quoted.""Acunetix was around the same price as all the other vendors we looked at, nothing special.""The pricing and licensing are reasonable to a point. In order to run multiple scans at a time, we are going to have to purchase a 100 count license, which is an overkill. Though, compared to what we were paying for, the cost seems reasonable.""All things considered, I think it has a good price/value ratio.""The costs aren't very expensive. It costs around $3000 or $4000.""I would say that Acunetix is expensive because there are products on the market with similar features that are equally or better-priced.""The pricing is a little high, and moreover, it's kind of domain-based."

More Acunetix Vulnerability Scanner Pricing and Cost Advice »

"This solution is cheaper than other tools."

More Kiuwan Pricing and Cost Advice »

"Veracode has been fair. We use their SaaS solution and it's just an annual subscription.""No issues, the pricing seems reasonable.""They just changed their pricing model two weeks ago. They went from a per-app license to a per-megabyte license. I know that the dynamic scan was $500 per app. Static analysis was about $4500 yearly. The license is only for the number of users, it doesn't matter what data you put in there. That was the old model. I do not know how the new model works.""They have just streamlined the licensing and they have a number of flexible options available, so overall it is quite good, albeit pricey.""For the value we get out of it, coupled with the live defect review sessions, we find it an effective value for the money. We are a larger organization.""I don't really know about the pricing, but I'd say it's worth whatever Veracode is charging, because the solution is that good."

More Veracode Pricing and Cost Advice »

report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Security solutions are best for your needs.
441,672 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Answers from the Community
Miriam Tover
Questions from the Community
Top Answer: The scalability is good. The scalability is more than good because it can operate both as a standalone and it can be… more »
Top Answer: We want to see how much bandwidth usage it consumes. When we monitor traffic we have issues with the consumption and… more »
Top Answer: The solution has a continuous integration process.
Top Answer: With this solution you only pay for the total amount of lines of code and it's a reasonable cost.
Top Answer: Improvement could be made with the integration of the programming tools. The solution provides some integration tools… more »
Top Answer: JaeLee, check out our comparison page here of Veracode vs Checkmarx… more »
Top Answer: I would recommend Veracode. Our uses cases included removing vulnerable code from our Product and ensuring the product… more »
Top Answer: SonarQube depends on completely what you configure the Rules. You will have the option of the Profile creation and can… more »
Popular Comparisons
Compared 60% of the time.
Compared 6% of the time.
Compared 2% of the time.
Compared 50% of the time.
Compared 15% of the time.
Compared 4% of the time.
Compared 1% of the time.
Also Known As
AcuSensor
Learn
Acunetix
Kiuwan
Veracode
Overview

Acunetix Web Vulnerability Scanner is an automated web application security testing tool that audits your web applications by checking for vulnerabilities like SQL Injection, Cross site scripting, and other exploitable vulnerabilities.

Software analytics technology with a breadth of third party integrations that takes into account the wealth of applications your teams are currently using.

We facilitate and encourage work between unlocalized teams. We understand the complexity of working on multi technology environments, constantly striving to increase the number of programming languages and technologies we support.

Veracode covers all your Application Security needs in one solution through a combination of five analysis types; static analysis, dynamic analysis, software composition analysis, interactive application security testing, and penetration testing. Unlike on-premise solutions that are hard to scale and focused on finding rather than fixing, Veracode comprises a unique combination of SaaS technology and on-demand expertise that enables DevSecOps through integration with your pipeline, and empowers developers to find and fix security defects.

Offer
Learn more about Acunetix Vulnerability Scanner
Learn more about Kiuwan
Learn more about Veracode
Sample Customers
Joomla!, Digicure, Team Random, Credit Suisse, Samsung, Air New ZealandDHL, BNP Paribas, Zurich, AXA, Ernst & Young, KFC, Santander, Latam, FerrovialState of Missouri, Rekner
Top Industries
REVIEWERS
Financial Services Firm42%
Comms Service Provider17%
Media Company8%
Insurance Company8%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company39%
Comms Service Provider15%
Government6%
Media Company5%
REVIEWERS
Legal Firm38%
Computer Software Company25%
Non Tech Company13%
Wireless Company13%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company43%
Comms Service Provider14%
Insurance Company7%
Financial Services Firm6%
REVIEWERS
Financial Services Firm34%
Insurance Company13%
Retailer6%
Pharma/Biotech Company6%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company41%
Comms Service Provider14%
Media Company6%
Financial Services Firm5%
Company Size
REVIEWERS
Small Business23%
Midsize Enterprise15%
Large Enterprise62%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Small Business26%
Midsize Enterprise8%
Large Enterprise66%
REVIEWERS
Small Business71%
Midsize Enterprise7%
Large Enterprise21%
REVIEWERS
Small Business20%
Midsize Enterprise25%
Large Enterprise55%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Small Business15%
Midsize Enterprise15%
Large Enterprise69%
Find out what your peers are saying about Kiuwan vs. Veracode and other solutions. Updated: September 2020.
441,672 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Kiuwan is ranked 14th in Application Security with 4 reviews while Veracode is ranked 2nd in Application Security with 12 reviews. Kiuwan is rated 8.2, while Veracode is rated 8.6. The top reviewer of Kiuwan writes "Helps us find security vulnerabilities in our code before our customers do". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Veracode writes "Offers everything for both static code analysis and dynamic code analysis". Kiuwan is most compared with SonarQube, Micro Focus Fortify on Demand, Checkmarx, CAST Application Intelligence Platform and Coverity, whereas Veracode is most compared with SonarQube, Checkmarx, Micro Focus Fortify on Demand, Klocwork and WebInspect. See our Kiuwan vs. Veracode report.

See our list of best Application Security vendors and best Application Security Testing (AST) vendors.

We monitor all Application Security reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.