We performed a comparison between Tungsten RPA and UiPath based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Robotic Process Automation (RPA) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The pricing of the solution is quite good."
"The product provides end-to-end solutions for different business problems."
"The most valuable feature is the robotic process."
"The product provided all the security controls that we asked them."
"The most valuable features are workflow and process automation."
"Kofax handles UIs via the browser well. If it's not possible, they have other features like modeling screen scrapes, etc."
"The product saves time and resources."
"The OCR was quite stable and flexible."
"The scraping for data extraction is very important. There is also a connection with all Microsoft tools, like Outlook, Excel, Word, et cetera. And OCR, the Document Understanding feature, is important because we have clients that ask us to read data from scanned documents."
"I love it for the deep artificial intelligence that it has. It has the AI to recognize the processes, analyze all the workflows through user interactions, and discover automation opportunities. It is very intelligent in these aspects."
"UiPath has saved the company costs."
"UiPath is much easier to learn than other tools. Its interface is not that complicated. It is very user-friendly."
"The most valuable feature is automating tasks that are highly repetitive, such as Accounts Payable. It is also easy to use."
"UiPath's most valuable feature is Orchestrator."
"We have found it to be quite valuable as we actively deploy and use bots, which have become a significant asset to our operations."
"UiPath support is amazing."
"Exception handling needs to be improved."
"RPA technology is constantly changing, and sometimes Kofax lags behind."
"The interface could be better from a usability standpoint."
"The technical support must be improved."
"This product has room for improvement in support of aviation. The interface could be improved in the next release."
"We are on version 10.6, and the current version seems to be 11. Kofax is cycling the capabilities of the product very quickly. One of the difficulties has been to actually keep up with the capabilities as they've evolved. On the one hand, it is good that the product is getting better, but on the other hand, it is difficult to implement the best way with a product that is evolving constantly."
"The product should improve desktop automation, which is hard to configure. It needs to have custom connectors. It is the only advantage that Microsoft Power Platform has over Kofax RPA. It has more than 800 custom connectors."
"I would like to see them further enhance the OCR, specifically in the multi-language support."
"UiPath can probably work on improving the AI features. We tried UiPath's AI functionality in our automation program. We did some research on that, but right now, nothing is in production. When we did some research, we weren't getting the expected results. We weren't completely satisfied with the results, so we put it aside. It could be a drawback on our side in terms of learning the tool."
"We are doing automation to take care of all our processes, but we still need support people 24/7 to monitor these jobs. So, human intervention is still there. We have two people monitoring these automations 24/7 because there are still some challenges with the automation."
"Some of the licenses, such as for Document Understanding, are a little bit expensive, and we hope that they will reduce the prices over time. Apart from this, I don't have anything to improve."
"The cognitive capabilities of UiPath are pretty time-consuming. If that can be improved, it would help a lot."
"I have trouble understanding the machine learning and AI components, so I would like it to be easier to understand how and what to do with them."
"On-premises deployment of UiPath requires a significant amount of RAM for optimal performance."
"The data team support that provides the UI and the chat services has room for improvement."
"The emailing and integration with self-service BI systems are areas that need improvement."
Tungsten RPA is ranked 12th in Robotic Process Automation (RPA) with 24 reviews while UiPath is ranked 1st in Robotic Process Automation (RPA) with 760 reviews. Tungsten RPA is rated 7.4, while UiPath is rated 8.8. The top reviewer of Tungsten RPA writes "A stable product that provides end-to-end solutions for different business problems". On the other hand, the top reviewer of UiPath writes "Facilitates end-to-end automation, has good AI and document understanding capabilities, and saves us costs previously spent on manual tasks". Tungsten RPA is most compared with Microsoft Power Automate, Blue Prism, Automation Anywhere (AA), SAS Data Management and ABBYY Vantage, whereas UiPath is most compared with Microsoft Power Automate, Automation Anywhere (AA), Blue Prism, Robocorp and IBM Robotic Process Automation (RPA). See our Tungsten RPA vs. UiPath report.
See our list of best Robotic Process Automation (RPA) vendors.
We monitor all Robotic Process Automation (RPA) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
