We performed a comparison between Tungsten RPA and webMethods Integration Server based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Robotic Process Automation (RPA) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."Kofax handles UIs via the browser well. If it's not possible, they have other features like modeling screen scrapes, etc."
"The pricing of the solution is quite good."
"The flexibility to use already-developed components is really good. You can use it for Excel-related operations and other things."
"The product provides end-to-end solutions for different business problems."
"Kofax RPA's best feature is its high success percentage in picking up information from documents, especially where the DPI is really low."
"The solution is scalable."
"The most valuable features are workflow and process automation."
"Provides valuable tools working in integration with RPA tools."
"Best feature is Insight for monitoring, and as a debugging tool. It has saved us a lot of time during crisis situations."
"High throughput and excellent scalability."
"The tool supports gRPC."
"What I found most valuable in webMethods Integration Server is that it's a strong ESB. It also has strong API modules and portals."
"A product with good API and EDI components."
"The tool is very powerful and user-friendly."
"webMethods platform is used to build an EAI platform, enabling communication between many internal systems and third-party operators."
"The development is very fast. If you know what you're doing, you can develop something very easily and very fast."
"This product has room for improvement in support of aviation. The interface could be improved in the next release."
"I'd like to see a recording function and a more simple interface."
"Kofax RPA's UI could be more user-friendly."
"Kofax RPA needs to improve integration with SAP and Microsoft. The professional services offered by the tool's team is below par. Its licensing needs to be more modular."
"I would like to see them further enhance the OCR, specifically in the multi-language support."
"There is really nothing special about the capabilities of this product."
"The product should improve desktop automation, which is hard to configure. It needs to have custom connectors. It is the only advantage that Microsoft Power Platform has over Kofax RPA. It has more than 800 custom connectors."
"The product needs more AI capabilities."
"Other products have been using AI and cloud enhancements, but webMethods Integration Server is still lagging in that key area."
"Support is expensive."
"Technical support is an area where they can improve."
"The logging capability has room for improvement. That way, we could keep a history of all the transactions. It would be helpful to be able to get to that without having to build a standalone solution to do so."
"We need more dashboards and reporting engines that can provide detailed information for management. In short, we need better analytics."
"Version control is not very easy. The packages and the integration server are on Eclipse IDE, but you can't compare the code from the IDE. For example, if you are working on Java code, doing version control and deployment for a quick comparison between the code isn't easy. Some tools or plug-ins are there, such as CrossVista, and you can also play with an SVN server where you have to place your package, and from there, you can check, but you have to do that as a separate exercise. You can't do it from the IDE or webMethods server. You can't just right-click and upload your service."
"I'd like to see the admin portal for managing the integration server go up a level, to have more capabilities and to be given a more modern web interface."
"This solution could be improved by offering subscription based licensing."
More webMethods Integration Server Pricing and Cost Advice →
Tungsten RPA is ranked 12th in Robotic Process Automation (RPA) with 24 reviews while webMethods Integration Server is ranked 3rd in Enterprise Service Bus (ESB) with 60 reviews. Tungsten RPA is rated 7.4, while webMethods Integration Server is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Tungsten RPA writes "A stable product that provides end-to-end solutions for different business problems". On the other hand, the top reviewer of webMethods Integration Server writes "Event-driven with lots of helpful formats, but minimal learning resources available". Tungsten RPA is most compared with UiPath, Microsoft Power Automate, Blue Prism, Automation Anywhere (AA) and SAS Data Management, whereas webMethods Integration Server is most compared with IBM Integration Bus, webMethods.io Integration, Mule ESB, TIBCO BusinessWorks and Boomi AtomSphere Integration. See our Tungsten RPA vs. webMethods Integration Server report.
We monitor all Robotic Process Automation (RPA) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
