We performed a comparison between Nintex RPA and Tungsten RPA based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Robotic Process Automation (RPA) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."Nintex RPA often includes security features, including encryption and user access controls, which ensure the protection of sensitive data and compliance with security standards."
"The initial setup process is easy."
"Nintex RPA doesn't require much coding, and you can drag and drop the activities."
"The product provided all the security controls that we asked them."
"The flexibility to use already-developed components is really good. You can use it for Excel-related operations and other things."
"It is stable and scalable."
"You can automate browsing tasks without needing a server connection. The platform provides its browser, allowing you to run anything inside it."
"The most valuable features are workflow and process automation."
"Kofax RPA's best feature is its high success percentage in picking up information from documents, especially where the DPI is really low."
"Kofax handles UIs via the browser well. If it's not possible, they have other features like modeling screen scrapes, etc."
"The product provides end-to-end solutions for different business problems."
"Further simplifying the low-code development process can attract a broader user base by making automation accessible to those with minimal technical skills."
"Nintex RPA is not suitable for PDF automation."
"There could be some features to fix compatibility issues with firmware."
"The product should improve desktop automation, which is hard to configure. It needs to have custom connectors. It is the only advantage that Microsoft Power Platform has over Kofax RPA. It has more than 800 custom connectors."
"I would like to see them further enhance the OCR, specifically in the multi-language support."
"The product has some constraints and performance issues."
"Exception handling needs to be improved."
"The solution could use some AI integrated features."
"The solution needs to be scalable."
"The product needs more AI capabilities."
"RPA technology is constantly changing, and sometimes Kofax lags behind."
Nintex RPA is ranked 24th in Robotic Process Automation (RPA) with 3 reviews while Tungsten RPA is ranked 12th in Robotic Process Automation (RPA) with 24 reviews. Nintex RPA is rated 7.4, while Tungsten RPA is rated 7.4. The top reviewer of Nintex RPA writes "Helps automate tasks and increases efficiency but does stop working sometimes". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Tungsten RPA writes "A stable product that provides end-to-end solutions for different business problems". Nintex RPA is most compared with Microsoft Power Automate, UiPath, Kryon RPA and Automation Anywhere (AA), whereas Tungsten RPA is most compared with UiPath, Microsoft Power Automate, Blue Prism, Automation Anywhere (AA) and SAS Data Management. See our Nintex RPA vs. Tungsten RPA report.
See our list of best Robotic Process Automation (RPA) vendors.
We monitor all Robotic Process Automation (RPA) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
