Teradata QueryGrid vs Tungsten RPA comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Teradata Logo
629 views|505 comparisons
100% willing to recommend
Tungsten Automation Logo
3,345 views|2,455 comparisons
82% willing to recommend
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Teradata QueryGrid and Tungsten RPA based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Informatica, Oracle and others in Data Integration.
To learn more, read our detailed Data Integration Report (Updated: April 2024).
768,246 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"It is a highly robust software solution."

More Teradata QueryGrid Pros →

"The most valuable features are workflow and process automation.""The OCR was quite stable and flexible.""The most valuable feature is the robotic process.""The best part of Kofax is that they have a whole concept. It's one product, but also has extra elements that can be integrated.""Kofax RPA's best feature is its high success percentage in picking up information from documents, especially where the DPI is really low.""It is stable and scalable.""Kofax handles UIs via the browser well. If it's not possible, they have other features like modeling screen scrapes, etc.""The product provides end-to-end solutions for different business problems."

More Tungsten RPA Pros →

Cons
"The primary challenge with Teradata lies in its cost structure, encompassing subscription fees, software licenses, and hardware expenses."

More Teradata QueryGrid Cons →

"The technical support must be improved.""The product has some constraints and performance issues.""The interface could be better from a usability standpoint.""RPA technology is constantly changing, and sometimes Kofax lags behind.""Exception handling needs to be improved.""This product has room for improvement in support of aviation. The interface could be improved in the next release.""The scalability has room for improvement.""Kofax RPA's UI could be more user-friendly."

More Tungsten RPA Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "The cost is substantial, totaling around $1.2 million, solely dedicated to upgrading the hardware."
  • More Teradata QueryGrid Pricing and Cost Advice →

  • "The normal price for an on-premises license is €50,000. That's the price for one robot license. You can have more than one robot license but only one can be run at any one time. I believe the cost of adding a second robot is around €14,000."
  • "Price is not a problem, because they are a competitor and we have a special rate."
  • "I don't have complete insight at this point in time, but I would guess that Kofax is a lot less expensive than Automation Anywhere. I would expect its license to be on a yearly basis."
  • "Its pricing is reasonable given the product capabilities. Kofax has a wide range of products, and it can sometimes be confusing to understand which capabilities come with which product set. One of the key facets that we've been looking into recently is cognitive document recognition that was a core pile of some of their other technologies such as Kofax transformation modules (KTM)."
  • "Kofax's prices are pretty reasonable."
  • "There is a standard license needed to use Kofax RPA and the price is reasonable."
  • "Kofax RPA is moderately priced but expensive in comparison to UiPath and Power Automate."
  • "I give the price of the solution a six out of ten."
  • More Tungsten RPA Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Data Integration solutions are best for your needs.
    768,246 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Top Answer:It is a highly robust software solution.
    Top Answer:The cost is substantial, totaling around $1.2 million, solely dedicated to upgrading the hardware. This amount doesn't even cover the software upgrade for the database itself, which comes at an… more »
    Top Answer:You can automate browsing tasks without needing a server connection. The platform provides its browser, allowing you to run anything inside it.
    Top Answer:Previously, Tungsten RPA offered perpetual licenses, but now it has a subscription-based model for more flexibility, similar to the Microsoft developer platform.
    Top Answer:Tungsten RPA features enhanced desktop automation capabilities, improved Active Directory integration, and upgraded recorder functionality. These updates will be available in the upcoming release… more »
    Ranking
    31st
    out of 100 in Data Integration
    Views
    629
    Comparisons
    505
    Reviews
    1
    Average Words per Review
    674
    Rating
    9.0
    Views
    3,345
    Comparisons
    2,455
    Reviews
    11
    Average Words per Review
    355
    Rating
    7.2
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    Kofax RPA, Kofax Kapow, Kapow
    Learn More
    Overview

    Teradata QueryGrid makes it easy to use all of your data and analytical engines to solve business problems without the hassles of connecting to multiple systems and moving intermediate results around to get the data you need where you need it.

    Tungsten RPA offers an efficient solution for streamlining business processes through Robotic Process Automation (RPA), which utilizes software "bots" to automate tasks like data entry and form filling. With Tungsten RPA, organizations can enjoy increased efficiency as repetitive tasks are automated, freeing up human resources for more strategic work. Moreover, the software ensures improved accuracy by performing tasks consistently and error-free, leading to reduced costs and enhanced compliance with regulations. Key features include a low-code design environment for easy workflow creation, intelligent document processing for handling unstructured data, automated process discovery, and flexible deployment options suitable for on-premises, cloud, or hybrid environments. Tungsten RPA presents a comprehensive solution for optimizing operational efficiency and driving business success through automation.
    Sample Customers
    ABANCA, American Eagle, DELL, flex, gates
    Aetna, BNP Paribas, Citi, Goldman Sachs, HSBC, ING, Aviva, Humana, Willis, Merck, University Hospitals, CardinalHealth, American Red Cross, Alegri, Capita
    Top Industries
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Financial Services Firm36%
    Manufacturing Company11%
    Computer Software Company9%
    Insurance Company8%
    REVIEWERS
    Computer Software Company25%
    Financial Services Firm15%
    Energy/Utilities Company15%
    Logistics Company10%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Financial Services Firm13%
    Computer Software Company13%
    Manufacturing Company8%
    Government6%
    Company Size
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business8%
    Midsize Enterprise7%
    Large Enterprise85%
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business36%
    Midsize Enterprise4%
    Large Enterprise61%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business19%
    Midsize Enterprise15%
    Large Enterprise67%
    Buyer's Guide
    Data Integration
    April 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Informatica, Oracle and others in Data Integration. Updated: April 2024.
    768,246 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    Teradata QueryGrid is ranked 31st in Data Integration with 1 review while Tungsten RPA is ranked 12th in Robotic Process Automation (RPA) with 24 reviews. Teradata QueryGrid is rated 9.0, while Tungsten RPA is rated 7.4. The top reviewer of Teradata QueryGrid writes "Unified and efficient query processing that seamlessly integrates and analyzes data from heterogeneous sources". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Tungsten RPA writes "A stable product that provides end-to-end solutions for different business problems". Teradata QueryGrid is most compared with Denodo, Teradata Data Mover and IBM InfoSphere DataStage, whereas Tungsten RPA is most compared with UiPath, Microsoft Power Automate, Blue Prism, Automation Anywhere (AA) and SAS Data Management.

    We monitor all Data Integration reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.